A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Battery safety (againish)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old March 23rd 19, 03:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
kinsell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 546
Default Battery safety (againish)

On 3/22/19 11:23 PM, 2G wrote:
On Friday, March 22, 2019 at 9:23:17 PM UTC-7, kinsell wrote:
On 3/22/19 8:23 PM, 2G wrote:
On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 10:04:00 PM UTC-7, kinsell wrote:
On 3/17/19 9:54 PM, Eric Greenwell wrote:
kinsell wrote on 3/16/2019 9:46 PM:


Many of us are flying with multi-cell LiFePO4 batteries that have
internal wiring and are not filled with resin.Â* Is that a problem?
Or is the location of the batteries in this specific glider such that
the resin is advisable?Â* A battery fire anywhere in a glider (even
without a fuel tank) is catastrophic. OTOH I havn't heard of any
fires with this type of battery.Â* It's the lithium-polymer battery
pack (also much larger, with many more cells) in the FES systems that
has had fires.


Well, the service bulletin talks about an LFP that burned.Â* There was
a fire in an EB-28 in Finland last year with a 10 A-H LFP.Â* Here's a
video of an LFP burning:

https://www.pilotsofamerica.com/comm...-fires.102016/


There have been claims that LFP's don't burn, but that's simply not true.

The Aerovoltz battery that burned did not have a BMS; in fact, none of
the Aerovoltz batteries have a BMS (battery management system). I would
not want to use one, even though the short engine runs typical of
self-launchers means problems would be less likely than in airplanes.
The Earth-X batteries all have a BMS, seem better characterized, and I
would trust them a lot more.


Yes, EarthX is well regarded in the homebuilt powerplane world. Dual
redundant BMS boards to make you feel good. Here's a greatpicture of one:

http://www.avidfoxflyers.com/index.p...ttery-warning/

If you poke around, there's a nice video from the Director of
Engineering at EarthX, he talks about the requirement to have a
gas-tight battery box vented to the outside, to use only a three-phase
alternator to charge it, and to add a crowbar circuit to prevent
over-voltage. Wonder how many glider pilots go to all this trouble?

I think I'll stick to SLA, just press the button and the engine starts
in about a second.


-Dave

P.S. That StewartB in the original thread was a real hoot. Said he
worried more about getting mad cow disease than having trouble with his
EarthX battery. Until his battery went bad. Don't know if he still
eats hamburgers or not.

Dave,

Perhaps you could post a link to this video - I could not find it. To the contrary, the video I could find extolled the safety of their batteries in aircraft:
https://earthxbatteries.com/product-...ental-aircraft


That video was in an EAA seminar:

http://go.eaa.org/UVqR00U0BE0SOs03oK000hV


Some good info on charging systems he

https://earthxbatteries.com/engine-c...hium-batteries


I am confused, is EarthX saying you have to enclose your lithium battery in a sealed box or not? If so, then why don't they say so on their website?


Websites are intended to sell product. You put too much truth on them,
they become less effective. It's like the Aerovoltz guy admitting that
the products are "smokebombs", you're not going to find that on the website.
  #22  
Old March 23rd 19, 05:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
kinsell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 546
Default Battery safety (againish)

On 3/19/19 3:27 PM, SF wrote:
I cut one of my K2 batteries open, after one of the cells in it failed. There's not a lot of space available in there for foam, or drill bits.

-nick one of the cells with a drill and it's going to be bad.
-Equal foam filling is unlikely
-Good possibility of the foam compressing the cells or expanding the case.
-The foam is going to interfere with heat dissipation in a big way, its a pretty good insulator.
-When chasing vibration issues, sometimes tightening up the system makes things worse not better.


I would agree with the above. The fix is likely to make things worse
rather than better.


-No one ever said they wouldn't catch on fire.


You're kidding, right?


Just if they do, they can be put out by depriving them of oxygen. Unlike Lithium ion chemistry batteries which supply their own oxidizer if they catch on fire. So the LiFePO batteries are considered to be a safer battery chemistry, but not a completely safe battery.


Safer than what?


A plastic box full of lead plates submerged in sulfuric acid isn't completely safe either.


Nothing is entirely safe. But the safety record of SLA batteries in
gliders over the past 25 years or so is outstanding. I assume you're
confusing wet cell batteries with SLA?


A LiFePO battery(s) with an internal BMS board, with a fuse right at the battery is the way to go, but treat it with the respect that that much energy stored in a small package deserves.


But of course that doesn't solve the problem brought up in the tech
note. If you have batteries that short out internally in normal use,
then discarding them is the only proper way to go.


SF


-Dave
  #23  
Old March 24th 19, 03:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,939
Default Battery safety (againish)

2G wrote on 3/22/2019 10:23 PM:
That video was in an EAA seminar:

http://go.eaa.org/UVqR00U0BE0SOs03oK000hV


Some good info on charging systems he

https://earthxbatteries.com/engine-c...hium-batteries


I am confused, is EarthX saying you have to enclose your lithium battery in a sealed box or not? If so, then why don't they say so on their website?


EarthX says:

4- Only the ETX900-VNT is designed for in cabin installations as it has a venting
system build in and is also in a fire proof containment system.

https://earthxbatteries.com/product-...ental-aircraft

Scroll down and select "Important safety/use precautions"


--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me)
- "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation"
https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1
- "Transponders in Sailplanes - Dec 2014a" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarm

http://soaringsafety.org/prevention/...anes-2014A.pdf
  #24  
Old March 24th 19, 04:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
2G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,439
Default Battery safety (againish)

On Saturday, March 23, 2019 at 7:42:49 AM UTC-7, kinsell wrote:
On 3/22/19 11:23 PM, 2G wrote:
On Friday, March 22, 2019 at 9:23:17 PM UTC-7, kinsell wrote:
On 3/22/19 8:23 PM, 2G wrote:
On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 10:04:00 PM UTC-7, kinsell wrote:
On 3/17/19 9:54 PM, Eric Greenwell wrote:
kinsell wrote on 3/16/2019 9:46 PM:


Many of us are flying with multi-cell LiFePO4 batteries that have
internal wiring and are not filled with resin.Â* Is that a problem?
Or is the location of the batteries in this specific glider such that
the resin is advisable?Â* A battery fire anywhere in a glider (even
without a fuel tank) is catastrophic. OTOH I havn't heard of any
fires with this type of battery.Â* It's the lithium-polymer battery
pack (also much larger, with many more cells) in the FES systems that
has had fires.


Well, the service bulletin talks about an LFP that burned.Â* There was
a fire in an EB-28 in Finland last year with a 10 A-H LFP.Â* Here's a
video of an LFP burning:

https://www.pilotsofamerica.com/comm...-fires.102016/


There have been claims that LFP's don't burn, but that's simply not true.

The Aerovoltz battery that burned did not have a BMS; in fact, none of
the Aerovoltz batteries have a BMS (battery management system). I would
not want to use one, even though the short engine runs typical of
self-launchers means problems would be less likely than in airplanes.
The Earth-X batteries all have a BMS, seem better characterized, and I
would trust them a lot more.


Yes, EarthX is well regarded in the homebuilt powerplane world. Dual
redundant BMS boards to make you feel good. Here's a greatpicture of one:

http://www.avidfoxflyers.com/index.p...ttery-warning/

If you poke around, there's a nice video from the Director of
Engineering at EarthX, he talks about the requirement to have a
gas-tight battery box vented to the outside, to use only a three-phase
alternator to charge it, and to add a crowbar circuit to prevent
over-voltage. Wonder how many glider pilots go to all this trouble?

I think I'll stick to SLA, just press the button and the engine starts
in about a second.


-Dave

P.S. That StewartB in the original thread was a real hoot. Said he
worried more about getting mad cow disease than having trouble with his
EarthX battery. Until his battery went bad. Don't know if he still
eats hamburgers or not.

Dave,

Perhaps you could post a link to this video - I could not find it. To the contrary, the video I could find extolled the safety of their batteries in aircraft:
https://earthxbatteries.com/product-...ental-aircraft


That video was in an EAA seminar:

http://go.eaa.org/UVqR00U0BE0SOs03oK000hV


Some good info on charging systems he

https://earthxbatteries.com/engine-c...hium-batteries


I am confused, is EarthX saying you have to enclose your lithium battery in a sealed box or not? If so, then why don't they say so on their website?


Websites are intended to sell product. You put too much truth on them,
they become less effective. It's like the Aerovoltz guy admitting that
the products are "smokebombs", you're not going to find that on the website.


Dave,

Did you actually watch this video? I ask because your link was a registration by someone else to the webinar, and doesn't work even if you put in your own email. I did find the webinar he
https://video.eaa.org/detail/video/5...%20E xplained
I watched the whole thing and didn't find reference to a gas-tight box with venting. He did say that EarthX has done a lot of testing of their lithium batteries and haven't seen one go into thermal runaway. He also said that thermal runaway occurs at temperatures starting at 270 C, the highest of all lithium chemistry's.

You wrote:
"Dual
redundant BMS boards to make you feel good. Here's a greatpicture of one:

http://www.avidfoxflyers.com/index.p...ttery-warning/ "

If you had gone to the next page, you would have learned that the battery pictured is an ETX12A, which DOES NOT have a BMS. Furthermore, it was used on an engine w/o a starter, contrary to the direct warnings by EarthX:
http://www.avidfoxflyers.com/index.p...arning/&page=2
In other words, this incident has absolutely nothing to do with our application.

Finally, you say I put "too much truth" on company websites. I have said this befo I DO NOT vouch for the accuracy of any company's literature or video, whether it is printed or online; I merely make reference to it so you can make your own decision. But, if you do not believe what they are presenting, DO NOT USE THEIR PRODUCTS!

  #25  
Old March 25th 19, 12:43 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
kinsell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 546
Default Battery safety (againish)

On 3/24/19 9:52 AM, 2G wrote:
On Saturday, March 23, 2019 at 7:42:49 AM UTC-7, kinsell wrote:
On 3/22/19 11:23 PM, 2G wrote:
On Friday, March 22, 2019 at 9:23:17 PM UTC-7, kinsell wrote:
On 3/22/19 8:23 PM, 2G wrote:
On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 10:04:00 PM UTC-7, kinsell wrote:
On 3/17/19 9:54 PM, Eric Greenwell wrote:
kinsell wrote on 3/16/2019 9:46 PM:


Many of us are flying with multi-cell LiFePO4 batteries that have
internal wiring and are not filled with resin.Â* Is that a problem?
Or is the location of the batteries in this specific glider such that
the resin is advisable?Â* A battery fire anywhere in a glider (even
without a fuel tank) is catastrophic. OTOH I havn't heard of any
fires with this type of battery.Â* It's the lithium-polymer battery
pack (also much larger, with many more cells) in the FES systems that
has had fires.


Well, the service bulletin talks about an LFP that burned.Â* There was
a fire in an EB-28 in Finland last year with a 10 A-H LFP.Â* Here's a
video of an LFP burning:

https://www.pilotsofamerica.com/comm...-fires.102016/


There have been claims that LFP's don't burn, but that's simply not true.

The Aerovoltz battery that burned did not have a BMS; in fact, none of
the Aerovoltz batteries have a BMS (battery management system). I would
not want to use one, even though the short engine runs typical of
self-launchers means problems would be less likely than in airplanes.
The Earth-X batteries all have a BMS, seem better characterized, and I
would trust them a lot more.


Yes, EarthX is well regarded in the homebuilt powerplane world. Dual
redundant BMS boards to make you feel good. Here's a greatpicture of one:

http://www.avidfoxflyers.com/index.p...ttery-warning/

If you poke around, there's a nice video from the Director of
Engineering at EarthX, he talks about the requirement to have a
gas-tight battery box vented to the outside, to use only a three-phase
alternator to charge it, and to add a crowbar circuit to prevent
over-voltage. Wonder how many glider pilots go to all this trouble?

I think I'll stick to SLA, just press the button and the engine starts
in about a second.


-Dave

P.S. That StewartB in the original thread was a real hoot. Said he
worried more about getting mad cow disease than having trouble with his
EarthX battery. Until his battery went bad. Don't know if he still
eats hamburgers or not.

Dave,

Perhaps you could post a link to this video - I could not find it. To the contrary, the video I could find extolled the safety of their batteries in aircraft:
https://earthxbatteries.com/product-...ental-aircraft


That video was in an EAA seminar:

http://go.eaa.org/UVqR00U0BE0SOs03oK000hV


Some good info on charging systems he

https://earthxbatteries.com/engine-c...hium-batteries

I am confused, is EarthX saying you have to enclose your lithium battery in a sealed box or not? If so, then why don't they say so on their website?


Websites are intended to sell product. You put too much truth on them,
they become less effective. It's like the Aerovoltz guy admitting that
the products are "smokebombs", you're not going to find that on the website.


Dave,

Did you actually watch this video? I ask because your link was a registration by someone else to the webinar, and doesn't work even if you put in your own email. I did find the webinar he
https://video.eaa.org/detail/video/5...%20E xplained


I watched it a long time ago. At that point, the link worked as
expected. Perhaps they edited the video, don't know. Doesn't matter,
the link Eric just posted makes it clear that for inside cabin mounting,
only the ETX900-VNT is to be used since it has a fire-proof casing which
also is a venting system. The manual goes into detail about venting to
the outside.





You wrote:
"Dual
redundant BMS boards to make you feel good. Here's a greatpicture of one:

http://www.avidfoxflyers.com/index.p...ttery-warning/ "

If you had gone to the next page, you would have learned that the battery pictured is an ETX12A, which DOES NOT have a BMS. Furthermore, it was used on an engine w/o a starter, contrary to the direct warnings by EarthX:


Yet at 24 minutes into your video, he's saying that all EarthX batteries
have BMS. And other users are saying the claims about an oversized
alternator are bogus.



Finally, you say I put "too much truth" on company websites. I have said this befo I DO NOT vouch for the accuracy of any company's literature or video, whether it is printed or online; I merely make reference to it so you can make your own decision. But, if you do not believe what they are presenting, DO NOT USE THEIR PRODUCTS!


I wasn't saying that you personally were responsible for their website.
I was saying "if someone put too much truth", just referencing the fact
that websites tend to gloss over negatives, and overplay the positives.

One thing in the seminar that didn't make it into the important safety
precautions list was wiring up the warning system to a light, or into an
EFIS on the panel. The presenter considered that to be mandatory, but
you have to dig into the manual to find it on the website.

-Dave

  #26  
Old March 26th 19, 04:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
2G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,439
Default Battery safety (againish)

On Sunday, March 24, 2019 at 4:43:31 PM UTC-7, kinsell wrote:
On 3/24/19 9:52 AM, 2G wrote:
On Saturday, March 23, 2019 at 7:42:49 AM UTC-7, kinsell wrote:
On 3/22/19 11:23 PM, 2G wrote:
On Friday, March 22, 2019 at 9:23:17 PM UTC-7, kinsell wrote:
On 3/22/19 8:23 PM, 2G wrote:
On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 10:04:00 PM UTC-7, kinsell wrote:
On 3/17/19 9:54 PM, Eric Greenwell wrote:
kinsell wrote on 3/16/2019 9:46 PM:


Many of us are flying with multi-cell LiFePO4 batteries that have
internal wiring and are not filled with resin.Â* Is that a problem?
Or is the location of the batteries in this specific glider such that
the resin is advisable?Â* A battery fire anywhere in a glider (even
without a fuel tank) is catastrophic. OTOH I havn't heard of any
fires with this type of battery.Â* It's the lithium-polymer battery
pack (also much larger, with many more cells) in the FES systems that
has had fires.


Well, the service bulletin talks about an LFP that burned.Â* There was
a fire in an EB-28 in Finland last year with a 10 A-H LFP.Â* Here's a
video of an LFP burning:

https://www.pilotsofamerica.com/comm...-fires.102016/


There have been claims that LFP's don't burn, but that's simply not true.

The Aerovoltz battery that burned did not have a BMS; in fact, none of
the Aerovoltz batteries have a BMS (battery management system). I would
not want to use one, even though the short engine runs typical of
self-launchers means problems would be less likely than in airplanes.
The Earth-X batteries all have a BMS, seem better characterized, and I
would trust them a lot more.


Yes, EarthX is well regarded in the homebuilt powerplane world. Dual
redundant BMS boards to make you feel good. Here's a greatpicture of one:

http://www.avidfoxflyers.com/index.p...ttery-warning/

If you poke around, there's a nice video from the Director of
Engineering at EarthX, he talks about the requirement to have a
gas-tight battery box vented to the outside, to use only a three-phase
alternator to charge it, and to add a crowbar circuit to prevent
over-voltage. Wonder how many glider pilots go to all this trouble?

I think I'll stick to SLA, just press the button and the engine starts
in about a second.


-Dave

P.S. That StewartB in the original thread was a real hoot. Said he
worried more about getting mad cow disease than having trouble with his
EarthX battery. Until his battery went bad. Don't know if he still
eats hamburgers or not.

Dave,

Perhaps you could post a link to this video - I could not find it. To the contrary, the video I could find extolled the safety of their batteries in aircraft:
https://earthxbatteries.com/product-...ental-aircraft


That video was in an EAA seminar:

http://go.eaa.org/UVqR00U0BE0SOs03oK000hV


Some good info on charging systems he

https://earthxbatteries.com/engine-c...hium-batteries

I am confused, is EarthX saying you have to enclose your lithium battery in a sealed box or not? If so, then why don't they say so on their website?


Websites are intended to sell product. You put too much truth on them,
they become less effective. It's like the Aerovoltz guy admitting that
the products are "smokebombs", you're not going to find that on the website.


Dave,

Did you actually watch this video? I ask because your link was a registration by someone else to the webinar, and doesn't work even if you put in your own email. I did find the webinar he
https://video.eaa.org/detail/video/5...%20E xplained


I watched it a long time ago. At that point, the link worked as
expected. Perhaps they edited the video, don't know. Doesn't matter,
the link Eric just posted makes it clear that for inside cabin mounting,
only the ETX900-VNT is to be used since it has a fire-proof casing which
also is a venting system. The manual goes into detail about venting to
the outside.


That might be a good idea for any starter battery, space permitting. I believe that a LFP battery with a BMS is a safer battery than a PB because the BMS will current limit whereas the PB will not unless fused. High currents will cause the wire insulation to melt and generate fumes, unless your glider is wired with aviation-grade wire (most aren't). A non-starter battery such as the Bioenno, shouldn't be any problem at all.





You wrote:
"Dual
redundant BMS boards to make you feel good. Here's a greatpicture of one:

http://www.avidfoxflyers.com/index.p...ttery-warning/ "

If you had gone to the next page, you would have learned that the battery pictured is an ETX12A, which DOES NOT have a BMS. Furthermore, it was used on an engine w/o a starter, contrary to the direct warnings by EarthX:


Yet at 24 minutes into your video, he's saying that all EarthX batteries
have BMS. And other users are saying the claims about an oversized
alternator are bogus.


EarthX clearly stated that the use of the ETX12A was an improper use, and that only the hundred series are approved for experimental aircraft. Which "other users" are you talking about? EarthX is VERY CLEAR that vintage alternators are not to be used for charging their batteries and use in these aircraft are not recommended.




Finally, you say I put "too much truth" on company websites. I have said this befo I DO NOT vouch for the accuracy of any company's literature or video, whether it is printed or online; I merely make reference to it so you can make your own decision. But, if you do not believe what they are presenting, DO NOT USE THEIR PRODUCTS!


I wasn't saying that you personally were responsible for their website.
I was saying "if someone put too much truth", just referencing the fact
that websites tend to gloss over negatives, and overplay the positives.


To the contrary, EarthX is very explicit about misuses of their batteries that you seem to want to disregard.


One thing in the seminar that didn't make it into the important safety
precautions list was wiring up the warning system to a light, or into an
EFIS on the panel. The presenter considered that to be mandatory, but
you have to dig into the manual to find it on the website.


The warning light was not listed as being mandatory, but presented as an additional safety feature. I have never seen this on any other battery, so I regard it as innovative on their part.

The testing I have done recently on a Bioenno battery vs a PC680 is that the Bioenno has about 40% more energy (WH, not AH) new. This advantage will increase with age as the LFP battery after 4-5 years should still be at 95%, while the PB battery will be down anywhere from 25% to 50%, or more. I will continue to use a PB for engine starting as that is compatible with the voltage regulator, and starter batteries last much longer than the instrument battery.

Tom


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PDA Battery [email protected] Soaring 4 December 28th 13 11:02 AM
USA / The Soaring Safety Foundation (SSF) Safety Seminars 2008 [email protected] Soaring 0 November 9th 07 12:15 AM
Find a Safety Pilot in your area with Safety Pilot Club Safety Pilot Club Instrument Flight Rules 0 December 29th 06 04:51 AM
The Soaring Safety Foundation (SSF) Safety Seminars Hit The Road in the USA [email protected] Soaring 0 September 11th 06 03:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.