Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11

"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
Tenured Physics Professor Steven E Jones gave two seminars to hundreds of
people on WTC controlled demolitions and how the government's version of
events "defies physics". The Feb 1st seminar can be viewed on Google
Video, or downloaded to your computer.


The following is a excerpt from Jones' PEER REVIEWED paper:

"I presented my objections to the "official" theory at a seminar at BYU
on September 22, 2005, to about sixty people. I also showed evidence and
scientific arguments for the controlled demolition theory. In attendance
were faculty from Physics, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering,
Electrical Engineering, Psychology, Geology, and Mathematics - and
perhaps other departments as I did not recognize all of the people
present. A local university and college were represented (BYU and Utah
Valley State College).

The discussion was vigorous and lasted nearly two hours. It ended only
when a university class needed the room. After presenting the material
summarized here, including actually looking at and discussing the
collapses of WTC 7 and the Towers, only one attendee disagreed (by hand-
vote) that further investigation of the WTC collapses was called for.
The next day, the dissenting professor said he had further thought about
it and now agreed that more investigation was needed."



Professor Jones now has dozens of people suporting him. His finding are
based on scientific evidence and logical reasoning.

Wow...dozens of supporters.

I'm convinced.

Paul Nixon

"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
"khobar" wrote in
news:9P8Lf.4247$Sp2.1482@fed1read02:


"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
Tenured Physics Professor Steven E Jones gave two seminars to
hundreds of people on WTC controlled demolitions and how the
government's version of events "defies physics". The Feb 1st seminar
can be viewed on Google Video, or downloaded to your computer.


The following is a excerpt from Jones' PEER REVIEWED paper:

"I presented my objections to the "official" theory at a seminar at
BYU on September 22, 2005, to about sixty people. I also showed
evidence and scientific arguments for the controlled demolition
theory. In attendance were faculty from Physics, Mechanical
Engineering, Civil Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Psychology,
Geology, and Mathematics - and perhaps other departments as I did not
recognize all of the people present. A local university and college
were represented (BYU and Utah Valley State College).

The discussion was vigorous and lasted nearly two hours. It ended
only when a university class needed the room. After presenting the
material summarized here, including actually looking at and
discussing the collapses of WTC 7 and the Towers, only one attendee
disagreed (by hand- vote) that further investigation of the WTC
collapses was called for. The next day, the dissenting professor said
he had further thought about it and now agreed that more
investigation was needed."



Professor Jones now has dozens of people suporting him. His finding
are based on scientific evidence and logical reasoning.

Wow...dozens of supporters.

I'm convinced.

Paul Nixon






Explain these facts:



I did.

----------------------------------------------
DW

TRUTH wrote:

Explain these facts:

FACT: Never before in world history has a steel framed building
completely collapsed from fire. Not before 9/11, not after 9/11.
Never!

How many skyscrapers have been hit by fully fueled 757 and 767 aircraft
before 9/11

FACT: WTC 7 was ***NOT*** hit by an airplane!

You got me there, but then there isn't anyone claiming otherwise, is there?


FACT: WTC 7 collapsed from "fire and debris", according to the government

Wow.. do you think it might have got some of the fire and debris from
another building, or 2?


FACT: The WTC 7 collapse mimicked controlled demolition, as did the
Towers. They all collapsed almost symmetrically, near free fall speed,
into their own footprints.

Free fall?


FACT: There were small puffs of smoke (known as squibs) coming out of
all three buildings, a sign of controlled demolitions.

Why would they need to demo WTC 7?


FACT: Romero recanted just a few days later without giving any scientific
explanation as to why. He was then promoted.

Who knows, do you?
Was he scheduled for a promotion? Can you prove he wasn't?


FACT: WTC 7 leaseholder Larry Silverstein bought a 99 yr lease on the
entire WTC complex just six weeks before 9/11, which just happened
to include terrorist attack insurance

Do you have evidence the previous leaseholder didn't have terrorist
attack insurance?


FACT: Silverstein said WTC7 was "pulled" on a PBS documentary

FACT: In that same documentary, a construction worker used the word
"pull" as slang for "professionally demolish"

Oh... Silverstein is a construction worker?


FACT: The WTC7 fire alarm was put into "test mode" the morning of 9/11

Given the fact that the two main buildings were hit by big planes, do
you think the people in WTC7 needed an alarm?


FACT: Silverstein was absent from his 88th floor office in the
North Tower on the morning of 9/11 due to a "doctors appointment"

WOW... That proves what?


FACT: The FDNY Chief Of Safely told an NBC reporter there might be a
secondary device in the building

There "might"