Bush AWOL Story - New theory comes to light

"Tammy" wrote in message
om...
".impervious" wrote in message
...
In om,
Chad Irby attempted to impart some wisdom, instead sputtering:

: In article ,
: (Tammy) wrote:
:
:
:: So far there have been no outright discrepancies. The closest that
:: the GOPs could get is that as an aide to Bush, he only released
:: positive information to the press and saved the negative information
:: until after he left the White House.
::
:: There are three things to keep in mind.
::
:: 1. He was a Reagan appointee, and served 4 presidents. Not exactly a
:: poster child for anti-GOP views.
:
: He was a long-term bureaucrat who quit during the current
: administration after being denied the promotion he wanted (and being
: effectively demoted). The worst thing in the world to happene to a
: dedicated paper pusher. That's reason enough.


He quit in disgust. The Bush administration is on record of asking him
not to quit.

Clarke had already been fired by the State Department in 1992 for lieing.
It is not surprising that GW demoted Clarke repeatedly and then put him out
at 30 years.

On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:52:42 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"Tammy" wrote in message
. com...
".impervious" wrote in message
.. .
In om,
Chad Irby attempted to impart some wisdom, instead sputtering:

: In article ,
: (Tammy) wrote:
:
:
:: So far there have been no outright discrepancies. The closest that
:: the GOPs could get is that as an aide to Bush, he only released
:: positive information to the press and saved the negative information
:: until after he left the White House.
::
:: There are three things to keep in mind.
::
:: 1. He was a Reagan appointee, and served 4 presidents. Not exactly a
:: poster child for anti-GOP views.
:
: He was a long-term bureaucrat who quit during the current
: administration after being denied the promotion he wanted (and being
: effectively demoted). The worst thing in the world to happene to a
: dedicated paper pusher. That's reason enough.


He quit in disgust. The Bush administration is on record of asking him
not to quit.

Clarke had already been fired by the State Department in 1992 for lieing.
It is not surprising that GW demoted Clarke repeatedly and then put him out
at 30 years.

More pure unalderated bull**** from the desperate trash right, I see.


*******************

"Reports that say something hasn't happened are always
interesting to me, because as we know, there are known
knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know
there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there
are some things we do not know. But there are also
unknown unknowns -- the ones we don't know we don't know."
-- Donald Rumsfeld, making things clear

To subscribe to Zepp's News http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zepps_News/join
For essays ONLY, http://groups.yahoo.com/group/zepps_...roups.com/join
For my fiction, http://www.finestplanet.com/~zepp/

knew a lot of guys who served in the
latter, and never heard of any overly taxing PRP requirements.


Like I said, I'm not sure how they did it years ago, what I do know is the
challenge in maintaining PRP certified Guard or Reservists (traditional) must
now be considered too complicated...at least that's what the BUFF reserve guys
have told me....


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"

That way you don't have to explain why you support the man who
brought us 9/11.

9/11 was planned and put in motion long before Bush was innaugurated. It's a
complete joke to claim Bush "brought us 9/11". If you could put away your
partisan politics crap, you'd see both administrations (Clinton & Bush) dropped
the ball. However, I don't expect you to think about this rationally, you've
proven incapable.


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"

Tammy wrote:

".impervious" wrote in message ...
In om,
Chad Irby attempted to impart some wisdom, instead sputtering:

: In article ,
: (Tammy) wrote:
:
:
:: So far there have been no outright discrepancies. The closest that
:: the GOPs could get is that as an aide to Bush, he only released
:: positive information to the press and saved the negative information
:: until after he left the White House.
::
:: There are three things to keep in mind.
::
:: 1. He was a Reagan appointee, and served 4 presidents. Not exactly a
:: poster child for anti-GOP views.
:
: He was a long-term bureaucrat who quit during the current
: administration after being denied the promotion he wanted (and being
: effectively demoted). The worst thing in the world to happene to a
: dedicated paper pusher. That's reason enough.


He quit in disgust. The Bush administration is on record of asking him
not to quit.

"they" didn't "get rid" of him, he resigned... and so did the NEXT guy
who had the job, for the same reason.

:: Huh? They try to prove that Bush took terrorism seriously by stating
:: that Bush deemphasised efforts to fight terrorism.
:
: No, they took it seriously by getting rid of someone who wouldn't
: understand the size of the problem, and who was directly in charge
: during the worst terror attacks in history.


They didn't just get rid of him, they downgraded the position of
anti-terrorism coordinator. According to testimony by White House
witnesses (those put in front of the panel by the White House) and
public statements from Cheney, Rice, and others, the position of
anti-terrorism coordinator was downgraded from a "Principle" (i.e.
high priority) position to "Deputy" (medium priority) position. Unless
you are going to claim that downgrading the priority from high to
medium is not a lowering the priority, or claim that Cheney and Rice
are lying, you have to take the position that Bush deemphasised (lower
the priority of) efforts to fight terrorism. Or you could take my
grandmother's attitude and say that the proof is in the pudding.

Or, I guess, you could be a GOP and accuse me of being a moron and a
lefty. That way you don't have to explain why you support the man who
brought us 9/11.

Bush has claimed that 9/11 is an example of the "successes" of his
administration. He has also made fun of 9/11 and the search for WMD.
His failed policies have brought us unemployment, war, death, and
fiscal ruin. It is my position that anyone who supports Bush is a
traitor. You cannot be both a patriot and support the destruction of
this country.

Very well said, Tammy.

--
"The tyranny of a prince is not so dangerous to the public welfare as
the apathy of a citizen in a democracy."
- Baron de Montesquieu, 1748

zepp wrote:

On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:52:42 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"Tammy" wrote in message
. com...
".impervious" wrote in message
.. .
In om,
Chad Irby attempted to impart some wisdom, instead sputtering:

: In article ,
: (Tammy) wrote:
:
:
:: So far there have been no outright discrepancies. The closest that
:: the GOPs could get is that as an aide to Bush, he only released
:: positive information to the press and saved the negative information
:: until after he left the White House.
::
:: There are three things to keep in mind.
::
:: 1. He was a Reagan appointee, and served 4 presidents. Not exactly a
:: poster child for anti-GOP views.
:
: He was a long-term bureaucrat who quit during the current
: administration after being denied the promotion he wanted (and being
: effectively demoted). The worst thing in the world to happene to a
: dedicated paper pusher. That's reason enough.


He quit in disgust. The Bush administration is on record of asking him
not to quit.

Clarke had already been fired by the State Department in 1992 for lieing.
It is not surprising that GW demoted Clarke repeatedly and then put him out
at 30 years.

More pure unalderated bull**** from the desperate trash right, I see.

I guess someone should start a lies told by reTarv list.

--
"The tyranny of a prince is not so dangerous to the public welfare as
the apathy of a citizen in a democracy."
- Baron de Montesquieu, 1748

"BUFDRVR" wrote in message
...
That way you don't have to explain why you support the man who
brought us 9/11.

9/11 was planned and put in motion long before Bush was innaugurated. It's
a
complete joke to claim Bush "brought us 9/11". If you could put away your
partisan politics crap, you'd see both administrations (Clinton & Bush)
dropped
the ball. However, I don't expect you to think about this rationally,
you've
proven incapable.

Not to mention the fact that "the man who brought us 9/11" was from neither
administration, but instead is running around trying to avoid capture by US
and/or Pakistani forces...

Brooks



BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it
harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"

"Kevin Brooks" wrote:


"BUFDRVR" wrote in message
...
That way you don't have to explain why you support the man who
brought us 9/11.

9/11 was planned and put in motion long before Bush was innaugurated. It's
a
complete joke to claim Bush "brought us 9/11". If you could put away your
partisan politics crap, you'd see both administrations (Clinton & Bush)
dropped
the ball. However, I don't expect you to think about this rationally,
you've
proven incapable.

Not to mention the fact that "the man who brought us 9/11" was from neither
administration, but instead is running around trying to avoid capture by US
and/or Pakistani forces...

Brooks

Ja, he's got all those billions from the foreward Derivatives
transactions to tide him over.. And Oswald shot one bullet, and Rghuby
vos ein patriot and the Liberty vos ein aggzident and..

Disgust at slave gullibility. "Have another cheeseburger Harv, you
fat, worthless goi"

Grantland