A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Mooney 201 question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 24th 06, 08:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Mooney 201 question

Hello

I am looking at Mooney 201 airplanes, due to their performance and good
fuel consumption, and had a few questions.

1) Which model year is more desirable than other years (SB's, ADs, etc
reasons...) ?

2) Which year did the tan colored panel come out? Can an older 201 be
retrofitted with the tan panel?

3) Which autopilot is recommended? If I had two 201's side by side,
which autopilot is preferred?

etc etc

any other info on 201's is appreciated.

THANKS GUYS

  #4  
Old September 25th 06, 05:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default Mooney 201 question

The 201 is a great airplane. I'm not aware of too many differences in
AD's in the 201 years (other than a minor aileron hing AD which
everyone has replaced). Especially in Mooneys its important to ensure
you have all the goodies in the panel when you buy the plane.
Installation prices for everything in Mooneys is higher than anything
else. When I was calling around on "fixed price" 430 installs no shop
was willing to do a Mooney install at their "fixed price".
The one thing I would avoid is the "dual mag" engines. At one point
Lycoming was producing 201 and Arrow engines with one mag case that
contained two mags. If the case had problems (like they tend to fall
off) you are left w/o a mag. Most owners have replaced these but there
are still a lot of them out there.
Also, you may want to consider the F model Mooney as well. Its about 10
knots slower but only about 60% the price of a 201.
Also, for any Mooney with electric gear you will want to check when the
gear actuator was last disassembled and the gears removed and possibly
replaced. Its now an AD on many but not all, although all are subject
to having gears jam if not inspected. Other than that just check for
the same things you would on any other plane (rust, etc). A Mooney
knowledgable A&P is always the best way to go of course for
prepurchase.
-Robert

wrote:
Hello

I am looking at Mooney 201 airplanes, due to their performance and good
fuel consumption, and had a few questions.

1) Which model year is more desirable than other years (SB's, ADs, etc
reasons...) ?

2) Which year did the tan colored panel come out? Can an older 201 be
retrofitted with the tan panel?

3) Which autopilot is recommended? If I had two 201's side by side,
which autopilot is preferred?

etc etc

any other info on 201's is appreciated.

THANKS GUYS


  #5  
Old September 26th 06, 12:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Jon Kraus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 194
Default Mooney 201 question

We have a '79 201 and have had it for 2 years now. We now have it
configured the way we like it. It has a Garmin 430 GPS/Nav/Com, Garmin
340 audio panel, Garmin 106 indicator, Stormscope, TrafficScope, King
DME, Garmin 396 w/ XM weather and STEC 30 AP w/ altitude hold and GPS
Steer.

As far as which year is better, it is probably a matter of preference I
guess (the newer the better?). I don't know about the instrument panel
color. Ours is black. Why you would want to pay the I'm sure exorborant
fee to have it made tan would make me wonder about your sanity.

There is lots of info at the Mooney.com website. THe Mooneys are nice
planes. You won't be sorry.

Jon Kraus
'79 201
4443H @ UMP

wrote:

Hello

I am looking at Mooney 201 airplanes, due to their performance and good
fuel consumption, and had a few questions.

1) Which model year is more desirable than other years (SB's, ADs, etc
reasons...) ?

2) Which year did the tan colored panel come out? Can an older 201 be
retrofitted with the tan panel?

3) Which autopilot is recommended? If I had two 201's side by side,
which autopilot is preferred?

etc etc

any other info on 201's is appreciated.

THANKS GUYS

  #6  
Old September 26th 06, 01:31 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default Mooney 201 question

Jon Kraus wrote:
We have a '79 201 and have had it for 2 years now. We now have it
configured the way we like it. It has a Garmin 430 GPS/Nav/Com, Garmin
340 audio panel, Garmin 106 indicator, Stormscope, TrafficScope, King
DME, Garmin 396 w/ XM weather and STEC 30 AP w/ altitude hold and GPS
Steer.


The STEC's with GPSS are a real hoot. I recommend them heartily.
I've got a 55X (which will also couple to the approaches).
  #7  
Old September 26th 06, 02:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Jon Kraus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 194
Default Mooney 201 question

Ours isn't quite as sophisticated but if you have a shallow enough
intercept angle it will fly the approach. It just won't fly a full
approach (without manually flying the procedure turn). Cool
none-the-less... Congrats on your IA by the way!! Great job!!

Jon Kraus

Ron Natalie wrote:
Jon Kraus wrote:

We have a '79 201 and have had it for 2 years now. We now have it
configured the way we like it. It has a Garmin 430 GPS/Nav/Com, Garmin
340 audio panel, Garmin 106 indicator, Stormscope, TrafficScope, King
DME, Garmin 396 w/ XM weather and STEC 30 AP w/ altitude hold and GPS
Steer.



The STEC's with GPSS are a real hoot. I recommend them heartily.
I've got a 55X (which will also couple to the approaches).

  #8  
Old September 26th 06, 02:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default Mooney 201 question

Jon Kraus wrote:
Ours isn't quite as sophisticated but if you have a shallow enough
intercept angle it will fly the approach. It just won't fly a full
approach (without manually flying the procedure turn). Cool
none-the-less... Congrats on your IA by the way!! Great job!!

Thanks. I think your autopilot isn't the problem but the GPS.
The 480 is unique in the richness of it's database that allows
it to do all the course reversals and even missed approach
sequencing WITHOUT any button pushing or manual intervention.

Now if I just had an autothrottle connected to the whole thing
I could take a nap while the thing was flying :-)
  #9  
Old September 26th 06, 06:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default Mooney 201 question


Ron Natalie wrote:
Jon Kraus wrote:
We have a '79 201 and have had it for 2 years now. We now have it
configured the way we like it. It has a Garmin 430 GPS/Nav/Com, Garmin
340 audio panel, Garmin 106 indicator, Stormscope, TrafficScope, King
DME, Garmin 396 w/ XM weather and STEC 30 AP w/ altitude hold and GPS
Steer.


The STEC's with GPSS are a real hoot. I recommend them heartily.
I've got a 55X (which will also couple to the approaches).


GPSS can now be added on to most of the STEC pilots as an additional
box that sits behind the panel. What you really start paying for is
pitch. Lots of autopilots can hold an altitude but when you want to
tell it to hold 400 fpm and capture an armed altitude its expensive. We
have that in the KAP140 that drives the new G1000 182. I looked into
putting it into my Mooney and then walked away.

BTW: An autopilot in a Mooney without altitude hold is almost useless
for anything other than cruise flight. Any slight turn in a Mooney
requires back pressure. A single axis autopilot will always be dipping
as it turns, as result you have to keep your hand on the yoke the
entire time.

-Robert, CFII

  #10  
Old September 26th 06, 06:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default Mooney 201 question


Ron Natalie wrote:
Jon Kraus wrote:
Ours isn't quite as sophisticated but if you have a shallow enough
intercept angle it will fly the approach. It just won't fly a full
approach (without manually flying the procedure turn). Cool
none-the-less... Congrats on your IA by the way!! Great job!!

Thanks. I think your autopilot isn't the problem but the GPS.
The 480 is unique in the richness of it's database that allows
it to do all the course reversals and even missed approach
sequencing WITHOUT any button pushing or manual intervention.


But not if the course reversal is a hold right? The G1000 goes into
suspend mode, I seem to rememeber the 430 doing the same. Unless there
is somethign new in the 480. The nice thing about the G1000 and 580 is
that after the reversal, it automatically starts to sequence again, the
430 and 530 would require you to press the "OBS" button to "unsuspend"
sequencing as I recall.

-Robert

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mooney 201 question [email protected] Piloting 13 September 27th 06 05:41 AM
Landing a Mooney Jon Kraus Owning 42 November 16th 04 07:00 PM
Mooney M20 K on Grass ? Andrew Boyd Owning 0 August 13th 04 03:00 PM
Mooney info eddie Owning 13 March 12th 04 06:42 PM
Cirrus vs Mooney Charles Talleyrand Owning 6 July 8th 03 11:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.