A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

High altitude Helicopter work



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 17th 03, 01:59 PM
Allen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default High altitude Helicopter work

I am curious about use of a chopper in the higher altitudes of
Afghanistan. The Canadians are in Kabul and the word is our Griffin, a
Bell 412 helicopter, can't work in the mountains. Anyone now why.....
lack of power at altitude, lack of oxygen ?

Allen


  #2  
Old November 17th 03, 06:46 PM
Simon Robbins
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Allen" wrote in message
.. .
I am curious about use of a chopper in the higher altitudes of
Afghanistan. The Canadians are in Kabul and the word is our Griffin, a
Bell 412 helicopter, can't work in the mountains. Anyone now why.....
lack of power at altitude, lack of oxygen ?


Rather than lack of oxygen, I imagine it would be that the lower air
pressure simply means the rotor is unable to achieve lift without an
unacceptable increase in rotor speed, which would likely overstress the
engines and gearbox.

Have a look at:
http://www.bellhelicopter.textron.co...pec_detail.htm
and you'll see the service ceilings. Not much room there to take mountains
into account, less so with a full load.

Si


  #3  
Old November 17th 03, 07:16 PM
B2431
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: "Simon Robbins"
Date: 11/17/2003 12:46 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

"Allen" wrote in message
. ..
I am curious about use of a chopper in the higher altitudes of
Afghanistan. The Canadians are in Kabul and the word is our Griffin, a
Bell 412 helicopter, can't work in the mountains. Anyone now why.....
lack of power at altitude, lack of oxygen ?


Rather than lack of oxygen, I imagine it would be that the lower air
pressure simply means the rotor is unable to achieve lift without an
unacceptable increase in rotor speed, which would likely overstress the
engines and gearbox.

Have a look at:

http://www.bellhelicopter.textron.co...z412EP_spec_de
tail.htm
and you'll see the service ceilings. Not much room there to take mountains
into account, less so with a full load.

Si

There was an example of that which made the rounds last year. There was a high
altitude rescue involving an H-60. The helicopter simply dropped out of the
sky, hit the mountain and rolled down the slope.
If anyone has a clip of that please post a link.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #4  
Old November 17th 03, 11:47 PM
Archibald
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Highest heli-rescue was in Nepal...Mount Everest, 7000 meters i think.
That's pretty high! Anyone know what it was? Gazelle i think?

B2431 wrote:
From: "Simon Robbins"
Date: 11/17/2003 12:46 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

"Allen" wrote in message
...

I am curious about use of a chopper in the higher altitudes of
Afghanistan. The Canadians are in Kabul and the word is our Griffin, a
Bell 412 helicopter, can't work in the mountains. Anyone now why.....
lack of power at altitude, lack of oxygen ?


Rather than lack of oxygen, I imagine it would be that the lower air
pressure simply means the rotor is unable to achieve lift without an
unacceptable increase in rotor speed, which would likely overstress the
engines and gearbox.

Have a look at:

http://www.bellhelicopter.textron.co...z412EP_spec_de


tail.htm

and you'll see the service ceilings. Not much room there to take mountains
into account, less so with a full load.

Si


There was an example of that which made the rounds last year. There was a high
altitude rescue involving an H-60. The helicopter simply dropped out of the
sky, hit the mountain and rolled down the slope.
If anyone has a clip of that please post a link.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


  #5  
Old November 18th 03, 12:10 AM
David Lesher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Simon Robbins" writes:


Rather than lack of oxygen, I imagine it would be that the lower air
pressure simply means the rotor is unable to achieve lift without an
unacceptable increase in rotor speed, which would likely overstress the
engines and gearbox.


I've wondered what keeps you from building a high-altitude version.

I envison big fat blades and an engine design for thin air. Or is there
some other issue I'm not seeing?
--
A host is a host from coast to
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
  #8  
Old November 18th 03, 02:00 AM
steve gallacci
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


There was an example of that which made the rounds last year. There was a high
altitude rescue involving an H-60. The helicopter simply dropped out of the
sky, hit the mountain and rolled down the slope.
If anyone has a clip of that please post a link.

Actually, that was a windy situation on a very steep slope that ended
with a rotor strike (if I remember correctly). The footage clearly
showed the machine hovering, attempting to get in close, then things got
bad. It was on Mt Hood or Mt Rainier.
But many helios have fairly limited ceilings and simply can't go very
high.
  #9  
Old November 18th 03, 03:27 AM
Larry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The footage clearly
showed the machine hovering, attempting to get in close, then things got
bad. It was on Mt Hood or Mt Rainier.

Right down the street at Mount Rainier.


--
(¯`·._.· £ãrrÿ ·._.·´¯)




"steve gallacci" wrote in message
...

There was an example of that which made the rounds last year. There was

a high
altitude rescue involving an H-60. The helicopter simply dropped out of

the
sky, hit the mountain and rolled down the slope.
If anyone has a clip of that please post a link.

Actually, that was a windy situation on a very steep slope that ended
with a rotor strike (if I remember correctly). The footage clearly
showed the machine hovering, attempting to get in close, then things got
bad. It was on Mt Hood or Mt Rainier.
But many helios have fairly limited ceilings and simply can't go very
high.



  #10  
Old November 18th 03, 05:00 AM
Dick Snyder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:19:57 -0500, "Allen"
wrote:

Thanks for the info guys. I checked out a web site with articles by the
crews of the CH-47Ds that worked the mountain ranges in Afghanistan.
They frequently did landings at 17000 - 20000 ft. All very interesting
and informative.

Allen, RCAF/Canadian Air Force, retired

Mind posting the link. As an ex-hook driver from during the
Vietnam era I'd be very interested. Our A-models had a service
ceiling of 12,500 due to hydraulic cavation. Hooks, at least the A,
B, & C models (all of which I flew), are hydraulic dependent (an
understatement to say the least). Can't even spool up the engines
without pressurizing the systems with the APU. A lot of changes were
made on the D model however.

Thanks,

Snyder, US Army, retired.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! Bruce A. Frank Home Built 1 July 4th 04 07:28 PM
GPS Altitude with WAAS Phil Verghese Instrument Flight Rules 42 October 5th 03 12:39 AM
Low and high altitude airways David Megginson Instrument Flight Rules 7 September 9th 03 01:18 AM
High Altitude operations (Turbo charge???) Andre Home Built 68 July 11th 03 11:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.