If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Poll: electrical connector crimpers/dies
"Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote in message ... : : Soldering is easy to learn and much more secure than crimped terminals. : : Bill Daniels : That is just not true. The reality is that you do need to have the correct crimping tool, which is the topic of this thread, and with those correct tools, the connection will be superior to a soldered connection. I solder my connections because I do not have the correct crimping tools, not because it is more secure... Dan DeVillers... |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Poll: electrical connector crimpers/dies
I solder my connections because I do not have the correct crimping tools, not because it is more secure... Did you have correct crimping tools in the past to verify they are superior? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Poll: electrical connector crimpers/dies
"abripl" wrote in message oups.com... : : I solder my connections because I do not have the correct crimping tools, : not because it is more secure... : : Did you have correct crimping tools in the past to verify they are : superior? : Yes, in the many (electrical/electronic) companies where I have worked. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Poll: electrical connector crimpers/dies
".Blueskies." wrote in message
... "abripl" wrote in message oups.com... : : I solder my connections because I do not have the correct crimping tools, : not because it is more secure... : : Did you have correct crimping tools in the past to verify they are : superior? : Yes, in the many (electrical/electronic) companies where I have worked. Excellent point, because there are wear limits and approved methods of testing connections, both for security and to verify that the correct crimper was used. When applied correctly, the result is a "cold weld", similar to that achieved in "wire wrap", rather than a gas tight seal. I haven't checked in a *long* time, and don't have reference material currently in my posession; but it stands to reason that any effective testing of the security of a termination/connection would constitute destructive testing. Therefore, if one is really dedicated to verifying that the "secure", one would need to make a number of sample connections--both before and after the actual production run for the airplane project--and make all of the appropriate measurements on the samples. A partial list of good information sources might include: Amp (for their terminals and related crimpers) Burndy (for their terminals and related crimpers) The Boeing Workmanship Manual The McDonnell-Douglas Workmanship Manual (presumably out of print) The ATA Spec. 100 Manual (There are sure to be government publications as well, but I don't know the titles) Alternatively, soldering has been used successfully for many years, but *requires* that the strain relief extend beyond the farthest point to which solder may be wicked. This nearly always means larger, heavier, and more expensive connectors and/or terminal strips. Therefore, if you are trying to "only add lightness", avoid solder! Peter |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Poll: electrical connector crimpers/dies
"Peter Dohm" wrote in message . .. ".Blueskies." wrote in message ... "abripl" wrote in message oups.com... : : I solder my connections because I do not have the correct crimping tools, : not because it is more secure... : : Did you have correct crimping tools in the past to verify they are : superior? : Yes, in the many (electrical/electronic) companies where I have worked. Excellent point, because there are wear limits and approved methods of testing connections, both for security and to verify that the correct crimper was used. When applied correctly, the result is a "cold weld", similar to that achieved in "wire wrap", rather than a gas tight seal. I haven't checked in a *long* time, and don't have reference material currently in my posession; but it stands to reason that any effective testing of the security of a termination/connection would constitute destructive testing. Therefore, if one is really dedicated to verifying that the "secure", one would need to make a number of sample connections--both before and after the actual production run for the airplane project--and make all of the appropriate measurements on the samples. A partial list of good information sources might include: Amp (for their terminals and related crimpers) Burndy (for their terminals and related crimpers) The Boeing Workmanship Manual The McDonnell-Douglas Workmanship Manual (presumably out of print) The ATA Spec. 100 Manual (There are sure to be government publications as well, but I don't know the titles) Alternatively, soldering has been used successfully for many years, but *requires* that the strain relief extend beyond the farthest point to which solder may be wicked. This nearly always means larger, heavier, and more expensive connectors and/or terminal strips. Therefore, if you are trying to "only add lightness", avoid solder! Peter I see, with regret, that I neglected to include my final comment; which is: I have not been working on airplanes lately; but when I do have to make connections, I do solder for the same reason and with the same limitations that .Blueskies already cited. Peter |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
electrical connector crimpers/dies
Robert Murray wrote:
Either AMP "red & blues" P/N 59250; or Daniels HX4 with Y501 dies. The Daniels tools are often on eBay, and reasonably priced as pro tools go. The AMP crimper is harder to find and more expensive. The AMP crimpers are in my AOG bag, and the Daniels' are in the big toolbox because they can be used on coax too. Bob I use Daniels HX-4 and did so in the service with good results. Like any other tool it must be inspected from time to time using the correct GO-NO - GO gauge. As for connectors I prefer cannon plugs with crimp pins. Again I use Daniels tools for this too. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
electrical connector crimpers/dies
"Dan" wrote in message news:e4EWg.6357$eZ4.5677@dukeread06... I use Daniels HX-4 and did so in the service with good results. Like any other tool it must be inspected from time to time using the correct GO-NO - GO gauge. As for connectors I prefer cannon plugs with crimp pins. Again I use Daniels tools for this too. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired Yep! Faster and no cold solder joints to chase. Bob |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
electrical connector crimpers/dies
Robert Murray wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message news:e4EWg.6357$eZ4.5677@dukeread06... I use Daniels HX-4 and did so in the service with good results. Like any other tool it must be inspected from time to time using the correct GO-NO - GO gauge. As for connectors I prefer cannon plugs with crimp pins. Again I use Daniels tools for this too. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired Yep! Faster and no cold solder joints to chase. Bob You haven't lived until you have had to repair a solder joint in the middle of a 100 pin cannon plug Then again, it's a good idea to lock your work away from the geniuses who want to help. I once spent 16 hours cutting wires to length, marking them and soldering on end into one of three bulkhead disconnects. Please note I said I cut the wires to length. The other ends had to go to various points on an instrument panel. While I was home sound asleep some genius decided to tidy everything up by cutting everything to one length. Would anyone venture a guess as to my reaction when I showed up for my next shift? Go ahead, guess. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
electrical connector crimpers/dies
"Dan" wrote in message
news:_8PWg.6620$eZ4.4208@dukeread06... Robert Murray wrote: "Dan" wrote in message news:e4EWg.6357$eZ4.5677@dukeread06... I use Daniels HX-4 and did so in the service with good results. Like any other tool it must be inspected from time to time using the correct GO-NO - GO gauge. As for connectors I prefer cannon plugs with crimp pins. Again I use Daniels tools for this too. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired Yep! Faster and no cold solder joints to chase. Bob You haven't lived until you have had to repair a solder joint in the middle of a 100 pin cannon plug Then again, it's a good idea to lock your work away from the geniuses who want to help. I once spent 16 hours cutting wires to length, marking them and soldering on end into one of three bulkhead disconnects. Please note I said I cut the wires to length. The other ends had to go to various points on an instrument panel. While I was home sound asleep some genius decided to tidy everything up by cutting everything to one length. Would anyone venture a guess as to my reaction when I showed up for my next shift? Go ahead, guess. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired Well, you're out and about. You obviously didn't over react. G Peter (Equally mild mannered) |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
electrical connector crimpers/dies
Peter Dohm wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message news:_8PWg.6620$eZ4.4208@dukeread06... Robert Murray wrote: "Dan" wrote in message news:e4EWg.6357$eZ4.5677@dukeread06... I use Daniels HX-4 and did so in the service with good results. Like any other tool it must be inspected from time to time using the correct GO-NO - GO gauge. As for connectors I prefer cannon plugs with crimp pins. Again I use Daniels tools for this too. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired Yep! Faster and no cold solder joints to chase. Bob You haven't lived until you have had to repair a solder joint in the middle of a 100 pin cannon plug Then again, it's a good idea to lock your work away from the geniuses who want to help. I once spent 16 hours cutting wires to length, marking them and soldering on end into one of three bulkhead disconnects. Please note I said I cut the wires to length. The other ends had to go to various points on an instrument panel. While I was home sound asleep some genius decided to tidy everything up by cutting everything to one length. Would anyone venture a guess as to my reaction when I showed up for my next shift? Go ahead, guess. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired Well, you're out and about. You obviously didn't over react. G Peter (Equally mild mannered) What saved that jerk's life, besides being sent home before I got in, was he spent the day cutting and marking new wires. I cleaned up the connectors and started over. Day shift, I was working swings, installed the other ends and I got to put the instrument panel in the airplane. It's truly amazing how many circuit breakers can pop at one time The ADI and HSI each had 50 something pin connectors I got to redo. Instruments that were supposed to have red lighting had white lighting, how does one mess up a 3 pin connector? Usually they wanted 2 weeks notice for a leave request. My shop chief suggested I take a week off "starting tomorrow." And that, your honour, is why I didn't get life in Leavenworth. As an aside crimp connectors aren't dummy proof either. At another base a decade later a SSgt was happily soldering crimp pins before inserting them into a cannon plug on a C-130. She had never been taught to use a crimper and didn't know she was supposed to use one. I was an avionics shift chief at the time and went out to check on her an hour before shift change. She had spent several hours working on a 54 pin connector that should have taken 30 minutes. The look on her face when I showed her how to use a crimper was priceless. And that's trained personnel, some of the work I have seen on home builts makes me cringe. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Exposed Electrical Wires in Boeing 737 Fuel Tanks! | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | July 17th 06 06:13 PM |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
2005 SSA Contest Rules Poll and Election | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | September 27th 05 01:47 PM |
Electrical system for Champ 7DC? | Jimmy Cash | Restoration | 3 | October 25th 03 08:28 PM |