If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Today the airplane has been seen by a specialist.
A good quick test in his opinion was the following: At sea level (we were at 600') with 40" MAP a fuel flow of at least 22 Gal/Hours should be metered / assured. The left engines was going at 22, the right one at 23. The left seems to be a little bit leaner (even at low rpm) than the right, but in his opinion the airplane is in airworthyness. The engines tuning to run exactly the same values may not be a good idea (he said) since they are not in the same manteinance state (0 vs 1200 hours). Some difference can be seen. They can also be tuned to run exactly in the same way but this will last only for few hours and then the differences will come up again.. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Based on personal experience, the fuel injection system on your
engine/s needs to be set-up precisely by the reference I gave you, using the higher limits for metered fuel pressure/fuel flow. These limits are to be determined using calibrated equipment. Your metered fuel pressure should be between 15.8-18.3 (I would highly recommend 18.3) psi referenced to manifold upper deck pressure. This should result in an actual calibrated fuel flow between 22.1 and 23.8 gallons per hour. Again, more fuel is better. Using the fuel flow gage (which is actually measuring metered fuel pressure) or a fuel totalizer installed in the aircraft is not suitable for this test/adjustment. Once the proper fuel injection system set-up has been accomplished, noting the respective take-off fuel flow indication is a good way of keeping track of the status of your fuel delivery. Depending on the engine/airframe installation, with the system set-up properly, quite often the panel mounted fuel flow gage indication will be at or above the high limit on the face of the gage. BTW, TCM considers any installed engine warranties to be null and void if these procedures are not followed to the letter. Again, I am not implying that you have a problem with your engines, just pointing out that there is a defined procedure to ensure that they are getting enough fuel...bearing in mind that the TSIO-360 series of engines is one of the most expensive general aviation engines (horsepower vs. TBO vs. overhaul cost) being used today. I do not want to get into the whole ROP/LOP discussion, but at a 75% cruise power setting, your EGT/TIT should be at least 125-150 degrees ROP with the mixture full rich. Regards; TC |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
At the end I agree with you.
I'll look carefullt at temperatures in the next flights and if they'll not be in the limits I'll stop the plane for a proper fuel setup. Thank You all for the help guys! S. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Leaning Procedure for a Carbureted 182 | Jeffrey | Owning | 54 | July 5th 05 04:23 PM |
It's finally running! | Corky Scott | Home Built | 19 | April 29th 05 04:53 PM |
Constant speed props | GE | Piloting | 68 | July 3rd 04 04:08 AM |
Lean of Peak Test Flight | Roger Long | Piloting | 0 | April 22nd 04 10:13 AM |
Rotax 503 won't stop running | Tracy | Home Built | 2 | March 28th 04 04:56 PM |