A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

the DC-3



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 20th 07, 01:05 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Kevin Clarke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 147
Default the DC-3

Not the plane, the airports.

The Washington DC area airports KCGS, KVKX and W32 operate with
additional security requirements as specified under SFAR 94. I was going
through those requirements to understand what I have to do to land at
CGS. I'm not really asking about that, I'll go through that journey and
report back. It looks to be a real pain and seems to be another
manifestation of pointless bureaucracy from the Department of Homemade
Security.

The real point of this post is how silly the additional security
procedures are and how they are left in place to provide the appearance
of additional security without actually delivering on that promise. I
just drove my daughter down to school. She starts college in DC next
week, a sure sign of my aging. Beyond the emotional trauma of that life
milestone, I had to wonder what that flight would be like. So I did my
flight planning only to come across this SFAR 94 restriction. I'd much
rather fly the 320 or so miles than transit the NJ Turnpike ever again.

But this time I had to drive. After going through the area on route 95
just past College Park you really get an appreciation for how pointless
it is to single out light aircraft in these restrictions. Nothing big is
getting in or out of CGS, it is only 2600' of runway. So this SFAR is
really directed at the small, light aircraft flown by the GA community.
As I was driving along on the bottom of the ADIZ I couldn't help to
think how silly it is, as giant semis hauling heaven knows what whizzed
along without restriction hurtling within miles of downtown DC. It is
all so silly.

KC
  #2  
Old August 20th 07, 02:45 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default the DC-3

Tell me about it.

I was based at VKX on 9/11. It took me nearly 5 weeks to get my
plane out of there and then it was with the PG County Mounties nad
very special procedures to let me evacuate.

I waited, applied, was prodded, fingerprinted, waited more, and was
trained to get authorization to get in and out of there.

I've done it once, it isn't worth the pain the the posterior.

Yes, it is completely useless. That was a fine little airport
as were the others. Small, often minority owned business there.
All are either defuct or circling the drain. Millions of dollars
to bail out the airlines in a predicament through their own greed
and stupidity but despite congressional lip service, nothing to
the Prince Georges County, Maryland airports that were destroyed
as a result of a false sense of national security from a toally
non-existant threat.
  #3  
Old August 20th 07, 02:58 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Kevin Clarke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 147
Default the DC-3

I was not a pilot on 9/11/01 so I wasn't in the community when this
stupidity went into effect. Why aren't people screaming about this? I
know there are some changes going into effect that look like they
simplify things for the ADIZ overall, so that looks good, but these 3
airports remain under lock and key.

That story seems horrible Ron. Sorry about that.

KC

Ron Natalie wrote:
Tell me about it.

I was based at VKX on 9/11. It took me nearly 5 weeks to get my
plane out of there and then it was with the PG County Mounties nad
very special procedures to let me evacuate.

I waited, applied, was prodded, fingerprinted, waited more, and was
trained to get authorization to get in and out of there.

I've done it once, it isn't worth the pain the the posterior.

Yes, it is completely useless. That was a fine little airport
as were the others. Small, often minority owned business there.
All are either defuct or circling the drain. Millions of dollars
to bail out the airlines in a predicament through their own greed
and stupidity but despite congressional lip service, nothing to
the Prince Georges County, Maryland airports that were destroyed
as a result of a false sense of national security from a toally
non-existant threat.

  #4  
Old August 20th 07, 04:00 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
John T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 194
Default the DC-3

"Kevin Clarke" wrote in message


It is all so silly.


Welcome to the world I've lived in since 9/11.

--
John T
http://sage1solutions.com/blogs/TknoFlyer
http://sage1solutions.com/products
NEW! FlyteBalance v2.0 (W&B); FlyteLog v2.0 (Logbook)
____________________


  #5  
Old August 20th 07, 06:32 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Friedrich Ostertag
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 41
Default the DC-3

Kevin Clarke wrote:
I was not a pilot on 9/11/01 so I wasn't in the community when this
stupidity went into effect. Why aren't people screaming about this?


They are. Those people that are affected by it. But they are only a small
number, so even screaming they don't make a lot of noise.

This is how democracy works nowadays: Find something to scare people, then
suggest a solution which only effects few. Bonus points if those affected
are perceived as wealthy in the general public. Whether the solution
actually works or even contributes to solve the problem is not a factor.

It makes you think, if even a honest attempt to install democracy in third
world countries is really such a great idea...

aviation content: I will be travelling through Nevada/Arizona/Utah in
September (by Car/Campervan), and would like to do a sightseeing flight or
two over the spectacular scenery there (as a passenger). I guess there must
be quite a few businesses offering such flights. I know there is a number of
companies offering flights over Grand Canyon. Would anyone recommend a
particular business, that does such flights? Any particular flight? What
should I look for? What should I avoid?

regards,
Friedrich





  #6  
Old August 20th 07, 08:41 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dave S
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 406
Default the DC-3

Kevin Clarke wrote:
I was not a pilot on 9/11/01 so I wasn't in the community when this
stupidity went into effect. Why aren't people screaming about this? I
know there are some changes going into effect that look like they
simplify things for the ADIZ overall, so that looks good, but these 3
airports remain under lock and key.

That story seems horrible Ron. Sorry about that.

KC


They DID scream about it. Just that we are a relatively small voice
being drowned out by a big machine. IF they had banned all private cars
and trucks within the footprint of the ADIZ and required use of public
transportation, you'd never have heard the end of it.

And that would have only been a few million directly affected, but Im
sure the whole country would have been up in arms over it..literally.

Dave
  #7  
Old August 20th 07, 09:59 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jay Beckman[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 46
Default the DC-3

On Aug 19, 10:32 pm, "Friedrich Ostertag"
wrote:
Kevin Clarke wrote:
I was not a pilot on 9/11/01 so I wasn't in the community when this
stupidity went into effect. Why aren't people screaming about this?


They are. Those people that are affected by it. But they are only a small
number, so even screaming they don't make a lot of noise.

This is how democracy works nowadays: Find something to scare people, then
suggest a solution which only effects few. Bonus points if those affected
are perceived as wealthy in the general public. Whether the solution
actually works or even contributes to solve the problem is not a factor.

It makes you think, if even a honest attempt to install democracy in third
world countries is really such a great idea...

aviation content: I will be travelling through Nevada/Arizona/Utah in
September (by Car/Campervan), and would like to do a sightseeing flight or
two over the spectacular scenery there (as a passenger). I guess there must
be quite a few businesses offering such flights. I know there is a number of
companies offering flights over Grand Canyon. Would anyone recommend a
particular business, that does such flights? Any particular flight? What
should I look for? What should I avoid?

regards,
Friedrich


If you are going to be in either Sedona, AZ or anywhere near Las
Vegas, NV you can book scenic flights to the GC from either town.

Sedona gets an extra vote simply because the scenery around it is
worth seeing from the air as well.

http://www.pbase.com/flyingphotog/image/55296514
http://www.pbase.com/flyingphotog/image/55301883
http://www.pbase.com/flyingphotog/image/55301237

Three views of Sedona from the air...

Hope you enjoy your visit!

Jay Beckman
PP-ASEL
Chandler, AZ
www.pbase.com/flyingphotog

  #8  
Old August 20th 07, 12:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default the DC-3

Kevin Clarke wrote:
I was not a pilot on 9/11/01 so I wasn't in the community when this
stupidity went into effect. Why aren't people screaming about this? I
know there are some changes going into effect that look like they
simplify things for the ADIZ overall, so that looks good, but these 3
airports remain under lock and key.

NOTHING IS BEING SIMPLFIED IN THE ADIZ.

It is actually getting more complex. The only thing that
has changed is that they (thankfully) decreased the overall
size.
  #9  
Old August 20th 07, 01:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Kevin Clarke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 147
Default the DC-3

Ron Natalie wrote:
Kevin Clarke wrote:
I was not a pilot on 9/11/01 so I wasn't in the community when this
stupidity went into effect. Why aren't people screaming about this? I
know there are some changes going into effect that look like they
simplify things for the ADIZ overall, so that looks good, but these 3
airports remain under lock and key.

NOTHING IS BEING SIMPLFIED IN THE ADIZ.

It is actually getting more complex. The only thing that
has changed is that they (thankfully) decreased the overall
size.

ok, fair enough. The operations procedures are the same so in that sense
it is not being simplified. I chose my words carelessly.

KC
  #10  
Old August 20th 07, 02:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default the DC-3

Kevin Clarke wrote:
Ron Natalie wrote
Kevin Clarke wrote:
I was not a pilot on 9/11/01 so I wasn't in the community when this
stupidity went into effect. Why aren't people screaming about this? I
know there are some changes going into effect that look like they
simplify things for the ADIZ overall, so that looks good, but these 3
airports remain under lock and key.

NOTHING IS BEING SIMPLFIED IN THE ADIZ.

It is actually getting more complex. The only thing that
has changed is that they (thankfully) decreased the overall
size.

ok, fair enough. The operations procedures are the same so in that sense
it is not being simplified. I chose my words carelessly.

They are NOT the same. An additional zone of confusion with a speed
limit was added. Not that the speed is going to bother many of the
small fry (nor the IFR's) but it is causing a lot of confusion already
from people who don't realize what it is exactly.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.