A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Co-Pilot Needed (URGENT)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 12th 05, 12:44 PM
IFR_Pilot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Co-Pilot Needed (URGENT)

Co-Pilot Needed

Urgent - for 12-day, long-range mission Departure tomorrow!
Space shuttle experience appreciated, but not necessary (will train).

Pay scale : $12.50/hour (no shuttle time)
Up to $18.00/hour (type rated and current).


  #2  
Old July 12th 05, 03:23 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



IFR_Pilot wrote:

Co-Pilot Needed

Urgent - for 12-day, long-range mission Departure tomorrow!
Space shuttle experience appreciated, but not necessary (will train).

Pay scale : $12.50/hour (no shuttle time)
Up to $18.00/hour (type rated and current).


Are meals included?

  #4  
Old July 12th 05, 06:04 PM
Ben Jackson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 2005-07-12, Paul Tomblin wrote:

It's a piece of cake - you just go out and do a bunch of turns around the
hold waypoint (Earth) and then come back. Kind of a long EFC time,
though.


Ahh, but you do it all inverted.

--
Ben Jackson

http://www.ben.com/
  #6  
Old July 12th 05, 07:28 PM
Marco Leon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That actually brings up an interesting point. Does anyone know what
coordination needs to happen with the FAA? Are they even involved other than
clearing the airspace?

Marco Leon

"Blanche" wrote in message
...
"Mission Control clears SMS to Canaveral via thrust vectors, Up,
Hold Earth, right turns, expect further clearance in ten days."




Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
  #7  
Old July 12th 05, 07:32 PM
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Marco Leon wrote:
That actually brings up an interesting point. Does anyone know what
coordination needs to happen with the FAA? Are they even involved other than
clearing the airspace?


Cancel IFR passing through FL600 on departure and request IFR clearance
prior to descending through FL600 on return. Watch the 250 knot below
10k airspeed restriction.
  #8  
Old July 12th 05, 07:36 PM
Stubby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Marco Leon wrote:

That actually brings up an interesting point. Does anyone know what
coordination needs to happen with the FAA? Are they even involved other than
clearing the airspace?

Marco Leon

"Blanche" wrote in message
...

"Mission Control clears SMS to Canaveral via thrust vectors, Up,
Hold Earth, right turns, expect further clearance in ten days."


I sure would like to have a type certificate for a space shuttle!
Their IFR flight plan must be bizarre.
  #9  
Old July 12th 05, 11:36 PM
Jimmy B.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Marco Leon wrote:
That actually brings up an interesting point. Does anyone know what
coordination needs to happen with the FAA? Are they even involved other than
clearing the airspace?

Marco Leon


There is a huge restricted airspace east of Canaveral. It's active for
several hours before the shuttle comes down. I believe the inner slice
is ground to FL600 and the outer slice is ground to infinite.

Basically, the shuttle never comes withing 25 miles of another aircraft
coming down.

"Blanche" wrote in message
...

"Mission Control clears SMS to Canaveral via thrust vectors, Up,
Hold Earth, right turns, expect further clearance in ten days."





Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

  #10  
Old July 13th 05, 12:39 AM
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Calling the shuttle a "glider" is a bit of a stretch. It basically
comes straight down. Your Cessna in a red line power on nose dive could
never keep up with the rate of decent. There is the approach plate out
there for the space shuttle. As I recall, it turns base at about 30,000
feet. I'm sure it easily stays over 60,000 outside the Edwards
airspace.

-Robert

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
private pilot in Chicago needed De'Wisz Piloting 6 May 7th 05 03:04 AM
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 41 November 20th 03 05:39 AM
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation Gilan Home Built 17 September 24th 03 06:11 AM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM
Small Sheriff's Departments Using Helicopters Gig Giacona Rotorcraft 23 September 7th 03 09:52 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.