A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

cirrus aircraft



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old October 1st 05, 08:24 PM
Roger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 04:25:12 GMT, Ken Reed wrote:

Even the SR22 isn't any faster than other light
aircraft that possess more stable flying characteristics.



more stable? How and where did you get the idea that the SR22is not?


Back two or three days ago, in this thread. The observation came from one
or two Cirrus drivers.


Wasn't me. Mine's quite stable.


Stable is a relative term. It depends on what you have been flying.
Typically, Fast and stable used to describe the same airplane is an
oxymoron. Even with that big wing and light wing loading the Bo is
near neutral in stability. (Mine has a slightly lighter loading than a
Cherokee, but that hummer is slippery)

Put a 172 or Cherokee pilot into a Cirrus or Bonanza and see how well
they do at holding altitude. Take all three and trim them for level
flight. Push the yoke down and then let go. How long does it take to
stabilize? The Cherokee and 172 will bob the nose up and down a few
times and in short order will be flying as if nothing happened. The
Bo will do a slow oscillation and take its time about coming back "if
it does". We have a husband and wife flying an SR-22 who say the
same about theirs. They purchased a new one just over a year ago, put
700 hours on that thing and have already traded it in for a new one.
I'd say they are "experienced" pilots.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
KR

Roger
  #72  
Old October 1st 05, 08:27 PM
Roger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 12:55:40 -0000, Dylan Smith
wrote:

On 2005-10-01, Ron Garret wrote:
I think it was me, and I never said it wasn't stable, just that it's
hard to adjust the pitch trim for level flight at high speed because
it's electric. That's very different from "unstable".


Seems to be true with all electric trimmers. I usually find myself


You should fly one of the early Debonairs. A quarter inch of trim
wheel movement will either push you down into the seat or lift you
right out of it. the fixed that after about 60 or so planes were
built, but that mechanical trim is very coarse.

giving up and using the manual trim wheel (if available). It's not
particlarly bothersome in most electric-trim-only planes though.


On our old Cherokee it was far easier to adjust and hold trim with the
button than the wheel.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
  #73  
Old October 1st 05, 08:28 PM
Roger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 13:00:22 -0000, Dylan Smith
wrote:

On 2005-09-30, Ron Garret wrote:
Not hands off, according to some Cirrus drivers.


It will fly level hands-off in roll (which is the axis that really
matters if you have to choose) but not in pitch at high speed -- at
least I have the very devil of a time trimming out the pitch. But YMMV.


Then again, a Piper Arrow generally won't do so either (all the Arrows I
find have had a fairly pronounced and slow phugoid oscillation. In fact,
I find the Beech Bonanza a lot less work to fly IFR than an Arrow
because the Bonana flies better hands-off).


The bo has much lighter controls too.
OTOH you see very few Bos flying IFR without autopilots. The Arrow is
just a big Cherokee with out the landing gear drag. They are still
very docile airplanes.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
  #74  
Old October 1st 05, 08:30 PM
Roger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 17:11:20 GMT, john smith wrote:

Then again, a Piper Arrow generally won't do so either (all the Arrows I
find have had a fairly pronounced and slow phugoid oscillation. In fact,
I find the Beech Bonanza a lot less work to fly IFR than an Arrow
because the Bonana flies better hands-off).


Then again, the Bonanza has a side-side tail wiggle that other airplanes
do not. And nothing short of a yaw damper will stop it.


Yah, but if the pilot doesn't sit in the back seat he'll never no it's
there. I've never noticed it on calm days either.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
  #75  
Old October 2nd 05, 01:44 AM
Doug Carter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 2005-10-01, Ron Garret wrote:

I usually find myself giving up and using the manual trim wheel (if
available). It's not particlarly bothersome in most
electric-trim-only planes though.


Electric trim on the 182RG works, if anything, a little slowly. Quite
precise; never need the manual wheel.
  #76  
Old October 3rd 05, 09:24 AM
Dylan Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 2005-10-01, john smith wrote:
Then again, a Piper Arrow generally won't do so either (all the Arrows I
find have had a fairly pronounced and slow phugoid oscillation. In fact,
I find the Beech Bonanza a lot less work to fly IFR than an Arrow
because the Bonana flies better hands-off).


Then again, the Bonanza has a side-side tail wiggle that other airplanes
do not. And nothing short of a yaw damper will stop it.


I've not found the Bonanza waggle to be something that makes it not fly
hands-off: it's short period, doesn't result in a net course change and
not particularly severe (well, unless you're in the back seat).

--
Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man
Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net
Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net
"Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee"
  #77  
Old October 5th 05, 11:34 PM
Roger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 08:24:41 -0000, Dylan Smith
wrote:

On 2005-10-01, john smith wrote:
Then again, a Piper Arrow generally won't do so either (all the Arrows I
find have had a fairly pronounced and slow phugoid oscillation. In fact,
I find the Beech Bonanza a lot less work to fly IFR than an Arrow
because the Bonana flies better hands-off).


Then again, the Bonanza has a side-side tail wiggle that other airplanes
do not. And nothing short of a yaw damper will stop it.


I've not found the Bonanza waggle to be something that makes it not fly
hands-off: it's short period, doesn't result in a net course change and
not particularly severe (well, unless you're in the back seat).


It does tend to raise the "barf factor" a tad, but it does that in the
straight tails too.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 02:24 PM
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? Ric Home Built 2 September 13th 05 09:39 PM
Washington DC airspace closing for good? tony roberts Piloting 153 August 11th 05 12:56 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 April 5th 04 03:04 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 July 4th 03 04:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.