If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
P-51 Rudder Aerodynamics
The rudder fitted to P-51 series aircraft is noticably thicker at its
hinge line than the vertical fin section just in front of it. Several writers have characterized the benefits of this "bulged" configuration as 1. reduced form drag at the juncture of fin and rudder, and 2. improved airflow characteristics over the rudder, with resultant increased control effectiveness and less tendency for the surface to exhibit a "dead band" around the neutral point. If this design element performs as described, why is it not more widely employed in elevators and ailerons as well as rudder applications, particularly in the faster homebuilts? I believe that it has been used on the ailerons of some of the after-market Pitts wings as well as some of the midwing acro designs. Have any downside effects been encountered? Hawkeye (Skyote NX8XX) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hawkeye Hughes wrote:
The rudder fitted to P-51 series aircraft is noticably thicker at its hinge line than the vertical fin section just in front of it. Several writers have characterized the benefits of this "bulged" configuration as 1. reduced form drag at the juncture of fin and rudder, and 2. improved airflow characteristics over the rudder, with resultant increased control effectiveness and less tendency for the surface to exhibit a "dead band" around the neutral point. If this design element performs as described, why is it not more widely employed in elevators and ailerons as well as rudder applications, particularly in the faster homebuilts? I believe that it has been used on the ailerons of some of the after-market Pitts wings as well as some of the midwing acro designs. Have any downside effects been encountered? Hawkeye (Skyote NX8XX) Hey Hawkeye, Jim Bede (8-) published a paper on this way back when. He had a cool graph about it IIRC, was taken from the P-51 studies. The BD-4 ailerons and flaps were done this way, about 10% thicker(?). But the elevator was (sorry, IS) a stabilator. Anyway, it gets back to one of the oddities of aerodynamics, the boundary layer. Thick boundary layers are usually not very desirable. Especially in the vicinity of control surfaces. The sudden (?) increase in thickness trips the boundary layer onto the control surface. Lower drag, more effective controls, and yes, a noticibly reduced dead band effect. But something to keep in mind when thinking about that ancient Mustang. It was and probably still is the ultimate flying machine. EVERY detail was optimized toward that simple goal of making a fast and furious fighting machine. So, ok, that is one way... But next time you get a chance, take a close look at the A-4 Skyhawk rudder. Ed Heinneman found a completely different solution to the same problem. Richard |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
First Two Aero Lessons This Weekend (Long) | David B. Cole | Aerobatics | 12 | December 3rd 04 01:18 AM |
Adjustable Rudder Pedals | Calvin R. Walker | Home Built | 0 | January 23rd 04 04:36 AM |
rudder cable question | Bob Loer | Home Built | 7 | November 26th 03 08:34 AM |
Rudder cable - was The Little Wheel in Back | BD5ER | Home Built | 9 | September 11th 03 04:14 PM |