If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A little fun from France (approach procedure)
We're always complaining about the subtleties of this or that procedure, so I
thought I'd throw in this one from Corsica. I particularly like the missed approach - in IMC at night. http://faris.nerim.net/LFKJ.JPG G Faris |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"zatatime" wrote in message ... On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:00:20 +0000 (UTC), (G Farris) wrote: We're always complaining about the subtleties of this or that procedure, so I thought I'd throw in this one from Corsica. I particularly like the missed approach - in IMC at night. http://faris.nerim.net/LFKJ.JPG G Faris That's wild. Could you post an interpretation of the missed in english? Its pretty obvious what it means |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
That's wild. Could you post an interpretation of the missed in
english? Its pretty obvious what it means I'll take a stab. Once established on the climb, turn left, intercept the ODR 245 radial while climbing to 3000 (meters? feet? furlongs?), and await (or follow?) further instructions from ATC. Climb to 2100 before playing the accordion. Jose -- Freedom. It seemed like a good idea at the time. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 19:46:50 +0000 (UTC), (G
Farris) wrote: In article , says... That's wild. Could you post an interpretation of the missed in english? I think now I know why I had to practice Pattern A and B. Once established in climb, turn *LEFT* (emphasis theirs) to intercept the RB 245 radial - Climbing toward 3000 and expect instructions from ATC. Climb to 2100 before accelerating in level flight. G Faris Thank you. Now, If your supposed to go to 3000, why would you want to level off at 2100? Is this just in case ATC keeps you under 3000? z |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 19:15:47 GMT, Jose
wrote: That's wild. Could you post an interpretation of the missed in english? Its pretty obvious what it means I'll take a stab. Once established on the climb, turn left, intercept the ODR 245 radial while climbing to 3000 (meters? feet? furlongs?), and await (or follow?) further instructions from ATC. Climb to 2100 before playing the accordion. Jose LOL. That's about what I got which is why I asked. Thanks for the try. z |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In a previous article, (G Farris) said:
We're always complaining about the subtleties of this or that procedure, so I thought I'd throw in this one from Corsica. I particularly like the missed approach - in IMC at night. http://faris.nerim.net/LFKJ.JPG I especially like the fact that while altitudes are in feet (and speeds in knots), RVRs and visibility figures are in metres. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ The e-mail of the species is more deadly than the mail. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
In a previous article, zatatime said:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 19:46:50 +0000 (UTC), (G Farris) wrote: Once established in climb, turn *LEFT* (emphasis theirs) to intercept the RB 245 radial - Climbing toward 3000 and expect instructions from ATC. Climb to 2100 before accelerating in level flight. Now, If your supposed to go to 3000, why would you want to level off at 2100? Is this just in case ATC keeps you under 3000? I think that remark about not accelerating applies to the restriction on the dashed line on the chart, where it says "IAS MAX 185kt". In other words, if you want to go to cruise climb that's faster than 185 knots, wait at least until you're either at 2100 feet or established on the straight line portion. It's a little weird that they don't depict the ILS on the chart the way they do on NOS charts, though, don't you think? Until I read the "ILS" on the minimum section, I thought the "025 degree" course after 5.4 AJO meant a 025 bearing to and then from CT. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ A fool and his money are soon flying more airplane than he can handle. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
says... In a previous article, zatatime said: Now, If your supposed to go to 3000, why would you want to level off at 2100? Is this just in case ATC keeps you under 3000? The French missed approach instructions generally state "Climb *toward* some altitude", rather than *to* - the implication being you will expect further clearances before you get there. This instruction is always associated with a "Level Acceleration" indication - the point at which it is safe to level off, or reduce to a cruise climb. Some approaches indicate "Level acceleration Not Determined". I think that remark about not accelerating applies to the restriction on the dashed line on the chart, where it says "IAS MAX 185kt". In other words, if you want to go to cruise climb that's faster than 185 knots, wait at least until you're either at 2100 feet or established on the straight line portion. The 185 KIAS limit is to insure compliance with the safe turn radius depicted. It's a little weird that they don't depict the ILS on the chart the way they do on NOS charts, though, don't you think? Until I read the "ILS" on the minimum section, I thought the "025 degree" course after 5.4 AJO meant a 025 bearing to and then from CT. The way they use NDB's is a little different. They use them a lot - plenty of approaches have only an NDB, labeled "L" (as in "L"OM), and a procedure turn or holding pattern entry. Many are not exactly aligned with the runway. They are reticent to publish GPS approaches, ostensibly because they are still holding out for Galileo - The European answer to refute any reliance on US systems. G Faris |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Canadian holding procedures | Derrick Early | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 22nd 04 04:03 PM |
Procedure Turn | Bravo8500 | Instrument Flight Rules | 65 | April 22nd 04 03:27 AM |
Missed approach procedure... | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 39 | November 11th 03 03:46 PM |
Which of these approaches is loggable? | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | August 16th 03 05:22 PM |