A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Aircraft Deceleration Devices



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old April 13th 04, 10:01 AM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"SteveM8597" wrote in message
...
A non flying software engineer friend of mine insistes it is poossible to

put
devices on a plane to make it safer by impacting the ground at a low

velocity
after loss of control or catastrophic failure, or to be able to manuever

to
miss an obstacle when impact is imminent. These devices would include
retrorockets, large recovery chutes, airbrake type control surfaces,

warpable
wings, and software on airplanes. Ballistic recovery systems have had
successes on light planes and ultralights Otherwise, I have told him that

the
above have been proven to be impractical and even dangerous. He insists

that
technology is there that would allow either an out of control or powerless
heavy to eiher recover or hit the ground softly enough that it would be
survivable. I've got 34 years in the business and a degree in aero

engineering
but he seems to think I am just being negative.

Any comments or knowledge of potential technolgy I can feed his pipe

dreasm
with?



It may well be technically possible but the challenge is to
develop a system at affordable cost that doesnt impose
unreasonable performance constraints and that performs
reliably enough to decrease risks.

For example consider the case of a ballistic recovery system
designed to allow an aircraft to 'parachute' to safety. The number
of situations in which such a system would have helped seems
small given that must airliner accidents happen at landing
or takeoff or involve controlled flight into terrain rather
than a technical failure. The result of such a system deploying
accidentally mid Atlantic would be unfortunate so it must be
rather more reliable than the aircraft itself, a non trivial task
when one considers how rarely aircraft have crashed due
to techical faults.

Keith



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 40 October 3rd 08 03:13 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 October 1st 04 02:31 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 September 2nd 04 05:15 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 October 2nd 03 03:07 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 4 August 7th 03 05:12 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.