A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How does R&D $$$ get assigned between F-22 and F-35?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 8th 04, 07:52 PM
Alan Minyard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default How does R&D $$$ get assigned between F-22 and F-35?

On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 13:06:28 -0800, Hobo wrote:


The F-22 and the F-35 are similar planes that share at least the engine
and maybe more. How do the R&D costs get divided between the two
programs? If the F-22 gets killed, will its R&D get moved over to the
F-35 and increase its price?


There is very little that the planes actually have in common. The F-22 is not
going to be "killed", but if the program was terminated it would have very
little effect on the F-35 program

Al Minyard
  #2  
Old January 8th 04, 08:16 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Alan Minyard" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 13:06:28 -0800, Hobo wrote:


The F-22 and the F-35 are similar planes that share at least the engine
and maybe more. How do the R&D costs get divided between the two
programs? If the F-22 gets killed, will its R&D get moved over to the
F-35 and increase its price?


There is very little that the planes actually have in common. The F-22 is

not
going to be "killed", but if the program was terminated it would have very
little effect on the F-35 program


tic toc ...


  #3  
Old January 8th 04, 10:24 PM
Chad Irby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

"Alan Minyard" wrote in message
...


There is very little that the planes actually have in common. The
F-22 is not going to be "killed", but if the program was terminated
it would have very little effect on the F-35 program


tic toc ...


Funny, you were claiming back in 1998 that it was just a matter of a
couple of years.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.
  #4  
Old January 8th 04, 10:40 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Chad Irby" wrote in message
. com...
In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

"Alan Minyard" wrote in message
...


There is very little that the planes actually have in common. The
F-22 is not going to be "killed", but if the program was terminated
it would have very little effect on the F-35 program


tic toc ...


Funny, you were claiming back in 1998 that it was just a matter of a
couple of years.


Yes and Lockheed is stall facing the same structural and avionics issues
they were then as well. At least now there seems to be a tendancy to admit
there was a problem, if not a little lie about now.


  #5  
Old January 8th 04, 11:27 PM
Chad Irby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote:


Funny, you were claiming back in 1998 that it was just a matter of a
couple of years.


Yes and Lockheed is stall facing the same structural and avionics issues
they were then as well.


Well, according to *you*, anyway. Not according to anyone sane.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.
  #6  
Old January 8th 04, 11:36 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Chad Irby" wrote in message
. com...
In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote:


Funny, you were claiming back in 1998 that it was just a matter of a
couple of years.


Yes and Lockheed is stall facing the same structural and avionics issues
they were then as well.


Well, according to *you*, anyway. Not according to anyone sane.


Acording to Congress.


  #7  
Old January 9th 04, 12:11 AM
Chad Irby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
. com...
In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote:


Funny, you were claiming back in 1998 that it was just a matter of a
couple of years.

Yes and Lockheed is stall facing the same structural and avionics issues
they were then as well.


Well, according to *you*, anyway. Not according to anyone sane.


Acording to Congress.


Not according to the fantasy Congress in your head, Tarver.

If you were even right about the F-22, the whole program would have been
gone before Bush even took office.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.
  #8  
Old January 9th 04, 12:34 AM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Chad Irby" wrote in message
news
In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
. com...
In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote:

Funny, you were claiming back in 1998 that it was just a matter of

a
couple of years.

Yes and Lockheed is stall facing the same structural and avionics

issues
they were then as well.

Well, according to *you*, anyway. Not according to anyone sane.


Acording to Congress.


Not according to the fantasy Congress in your head, Tarver.


Are you hearing voices you believe are comming from my head, Irby?

Congress threatened the program with cancellation, when they gave them this
year's budget. That is what the whole "F-22 turned around in 2003" thing is
about.


  #9  
Old January 9th 04, 12:46 AM
Chad Irby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

Are you hearing voices you believe are comming from my head, Irby?


No, it's just observation. Nothing else could explain where you get
your "information."

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.
  #10  
Old January 9th 04, 01:02 AM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Chad Irby" wrote in message
. com...
In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

Are you hearing voices you believe are comming from my head, Irby?


No, it's just observation.


What are these voices telling you, Irby?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 40 October 3rd 08 03:13 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 December 2nd 04 07:00 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 October 1st 04 02:31 PM
Report Leaving Assigned Altitude? John Clonts Instrument Flight Rules 81 March 20th 04 02:34 PM
Non-radar transponder codes Michael Instrument Flight Rules 16 February 13th 04 01:15 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.