A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Training aircraft recommendations



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old April 20th 04, 07:26 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Cecil Chapman" wrote in message
news:lpbhc.24557

And I have some personal reasons
for looking for an aircraft with the above properties.


'Personal reasons' ???? How intimate a disclosure would it be to tell

what
kind of aircraft you would like to fly.... Man ,,, you're creeping me
out..... :-/


Yeah. Sign of the times. Don't say you don't need to learn to land it or
you'll be hearing helicopters.

-c



  #12  
Old April 20th 04, 07:28 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Benjamin Gawert" wrote in message news:c63jnl$7jui8$2@ID-

Thanks for Your answer! Yes, I think the T-34 or T-34C would be the way to
go.


Plus it's a beautiful airplane!

-c


  #13  
Old April 21st 04, 12:35 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

the "killer AD's" refer to wing spar attachments and such... I think the
T-34 lost last season in TX was a possible spar attach failure.

Cost of repair could ground the aircraft permanently.

BT

"Benjamin Gawert" wrote in message
...
Michael wrote:

Airplanes such as you describe are not normally used for civilian
flight training, and are not common in the civilian fleet. If you
must use such an airplane, I suggest the T-34. It is a surplus
military trainer, but available used on the civil market. Be aware,
there are some killer AD's in the works.


Thanks for Your answer! Yes, I think the T-34 or T-34C would be the way to
go.

Benjamin



  #14  
Old April 22nd 04, 05:50 PM
Greg Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 16:35:45 -0700, BTIZ wrote:

the "killer AD's" refer to wing spar attachments and such... I think the
T-34 lost last season in TX was a possible spar attach failure.

Cost of repair could ground the aircraft permanently.

BT

"Benjamin Gawert" wrote in message
...
Michael wrote:

Airplanes such as you describe are not normally used for civilian
flight training, and are not common in the civilian fleet. If you
must use such an airplane, I suggest the T-34. It is a surplus
military trainer, but available used on the civil market. Be aware,
there are some killer AD's in the works.


Thanks for Your answer! Yes, I think the T-34 or T-34C would be the way to
go.

Benjamin


Last I heard, those planes were compliant to all ADs. Is that not true?


  #15  
Old April 22nd 04, 10:58 PM
Michael
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Greg Copeland wrote
Last I heard, those planes were compliant to all ADs. Is that not true?


No, it's not. None of the T-34's that lost a wing were AD compliant.
More importantly, none were privately owned. All belonged to these
'weekend warrior' operations, meaning they were rode hard and put up
wet.

The one that crashed in Houston recently was scheduled to have the AD
performed, and thus should have been restricted to 2 gees. Camera
film indicates that it was passing a plane in a turn, on the outside.
The plane on the inside of the turn was puling 5 gees.

Despite this, the old AD has been ruled insufficient, and the new AD
will likely be a killer.

Michael
  #16  
Old April 22nd 04, 11:35 PM
Greg Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 14:58:11 -0700, Michael wrote:

Greg Copeland wrote
Last I heard, those planes were compliant to all ADs. Is that not true?


No, it's not. None of the T-34's that lost a wing were AD compliant.
More importantly, none were privately owned. All belonged to these
'weekend warrior' operations, meaning they were rode hard and put up
wet.

The one that crashed in Houston recently was scheduled to have the AD
performed, and thus should have been restricted to 2 gees. Camera
film indicates that it was passing a plane in a turn, on the outside.
The plane on the inside of the turn was puling 5 gees.

Despite this, the old AD has been ruled insufficient, and the new AD
will likely be a killer.


Wow. Hard to believe that an operation like that would not of
placed prioity on complying with AD's.

Thanks.






  #17  
Old April 25th 04, 09:55 PM
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Benjamin

One came unglued just north of Houston a couple of months ago.

Nice guy and his air combat student were killed.

Big John


On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:37:57 +0200, "Benjamin Gawert"
wrote:

Michael wrote:

Airplanes such as you describe are not normally used for civilian
flight training, and are not common in the civilian fleet. If you
must use such an airplane, I suggest the T-34. It is a surplus
military trainer, but available used on the civil market. Be aware,
there are some killer AD's in the works.


Thanks for Your answer! Yes, I think the T-34 or T-34C would be the way to
go.

Benjamin


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 June 2nd 04 07:17 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 May 1st 04 07:29 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 April 5th 04 03:04 PM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.