If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"arcwi" wrote in message
... Yes, but the common logic suggest that you also spend less time in tailwind that in head wind Yes. - and if there is no wind the two should cancell each other... No. Nothing makes them differ by equal amounts. Consider the case when the headwind is equal to the TAS. Then it takes *forever* to get to B. Or consider a headwind that's just one knot less than the TAS. You eventually get to B, but it takes an enormous amount of time. Even if the trip back to A were instantaneous (which it isn't), it still couldn't cancel out the extra time it took to get to B. --Gary Or should they... "Stefan" wrote in message ... arcwi wrote: Can someone explain the difference? You spend more time in headwind than in tailwind. Stefan |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Casey Wilson wrote: (James L. Freeman) wrote in message .com... Can someone offer a non-mathematical EXPLANATION (as opposed to DESCRIPTION) of why the speed of headwind and crosswind components of a wind add up to more than the speed of the wind? I'll give it a go (use to tutor math in college but that was a while ago ^_^). This works best with pictures but here's teh basic outline. Imgine you have a block on the floor. Two guys (A and B) are going to push on the block. Since we're doing this wihtout pictures let's imgine you're looking at the block from teh top down and it can go North/south/east/west over teh floor. 1. A pushes on the south side of the block with 5 units (of whatever), B pushes on the south side of the block with 5 units of force. The result the block moves to the north with 10 units of force. 2. A pushes on teh south side of the block with 5 units, B pushes on the north side of the block with 5 units. Result, teh block doesn't move at all. But Both A & B are pushing with 5 units. 3. A pushes on the south side of teh block, B pushes on the east side f teh block. Result is the block moves north-east. That sounds ok right? But wait a mintue, in example 3 if only A was pushing then the block would move north and only north. And if only B was pushing the block would move east and only east. The block moves north-east because both are pushing. In example 2 the block didn't move at all, because A and B are pushing in opposite directions with equal force. But What if A pushing on the south side of rh block with 10 units and B pushes on teh north side with 8 units? Well the block would move north, at 2 units ofr force. From the blocks POV having A push from teh south at 10 & B push from teh north at 8, is THE SAME THING as just having someone push at 2 units of force. This is know as vector addition. You need to take teh scaler (number of units of push) and the vector (direction) into account to do vector addition. So if I told you that A was pushing at 10 units and B was pushing at 10 units, and asked what direction is the block moving what would you say? Well you 'should' say "I don't kow." Because you don't know what direction A and B are pushing. The above examples are easy because A nd B are pushing in opposite direttions. It's a little harder to think of it when A and B push between 0-180 degrees. The math is easy (sin/cos stuff or use a cross wind diagram). It's the same thing thou. Let's say you want to land on runway 36 (to make life easy). The wind is 045 @ 20. Well just like teh block having the win at 045 @ 20, is the same as having two winds that are pushing the plane at the same time. One wind is coming from 360 and the other from 090, the end result is a single wind from 045 (yes I know wind doesn't work like that work with me here). The reason we 'spilt the wind up' is because the 'peice' of wind coming from 360 doesn't concern us, but that peice from 090 does, as it'll blow us off course when landing. So it's the reverse of the block examples, we have one force at some odd angle, and we spilt it into two force: head wind and cross wind. Because these forces have strength (number of units) and direction (in this case 045) we can't just add/subtract like number. Just like the block example above where the block was moving forward at 2 units, wind acts the same. Landing on 360 with a wind from 360 @ 10 is all head wind, 015 @ 10 a little cross wind, 080 @ 10 almost all cross wind. So the cross wind component varies with direction, and you can't just add/subtract the units to get there. Now find any url about trig and look up sin and/or cos and this will make a lot more sense (I hope). But you asked why and not how to calculate it This stuff is actually pretty easy to do if you have a scienctific calculator. Sorry the above is so long ... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
arcwi wrote: That's simple - it's a vector sum. But can someone explane this to me: Scenario One An aicraft is flying from A to B, TAS=200 Kts, Distance AtoB=100nm, Wind blowing from B to A with a speed=100Kts Everyone should be able to claculate that GS(A-B)=100 Kts and GS(B-A)=300 Kts , therefore round trip time A-B-A=60min+20min=1hr20min Scenario Two Same as One, but remove the wind completely. The GS in both cases = 200 Kts, therefore round trip time A-B-A = 30min+30min = 1hr Can someone explain the difference? I just wrote a long reply about how vectors sort of work. Not sure if this helps or not (as I'm not 100% sure of the question you're trying to ask but...). Break it down a bit more. Thing of Scenario 1 as two trips: A-B, flying at 200kts into 100kts head win, gs = 100kts. Distance is 100kts. 100/100 = 1hr B-A, flying at 200kts with 100kts tail wind, gs = 300kts. Distnace is 100kts. 100/300 = 20min (1/3 of an hour) Total time 1:20 Scenario 2: A-B, flying at 200kts no wind. Distance is 100kts. 100/200 = 30 min B-A, flying at 200kts no wind. Distance is 100kts. 100/200 = 30 min Total time 1hr Here's teh take home message, wind ALWAYS slows you down (round trip). And you spend more time flying with a headwind than a tail wind(it's not 50/50 ^_^). |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Common logic fails here, because the the commonsense explanation that the
upwind and downwind differences ought to cancel out only works if the relationship is linear. If you do the math, the relationship between the round trip time, round trip distance, TAS and wind speed is nonlinear: time = distance/speed round trip time = time out(upwind) + time back(downwind), = D/(T - W) + D/(T + W), where D = leg distance, T = TAS, W = windspeed = [D(T + W) + D(T - W)] / [(T - W)(T + W)], using x/y + z/w = (xw + yz)/yw = (DT + DW + DT - DW) / (T^2 - TW + TW - W^2) = 2DT / (T^2 - W^2) 2D is the round trip distance, so in words: round trip time = (round trip distance x TAS) / (TAS^2 - windspeed^2) [As a check, this reduces to: round trip time = round trip distance / TAS, when windspeed = 0] Hence the relationship is nonlinear with respect to wind speed. That isn't normally so obvious because usually TAS wind speed. It's more obvious in the original post because the poster chose a wind speed much closer to TAS. [Work it out for windspeed = 10 kt and the other data in the original post, and the upwind and downwind differences do almost cancel out. Then work it out for windspeed = 199 kt!] nuke "arcwi" wrote in message ... Yes, but the common logic suggest that you also spend less time in tailwind that in head wind - and if there is no wind the two should cancell each other... Or should they... "Stefan" wrote in message ... arcwi wrote: Can someone explain the difference? You spend more time in headwind than in tailwind. Stefan |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"James L. Freeman" wrote in message om... Can someone offer a non-mathematical EXPLANATION (as opposed to DESCRIPTION) of why the speed of headwind and crosswind components of a wind add up to more than the speed of the wind? Thanks. I'm not sure where James's question was going, but here is an example as I just copied it minutes ago from: http://www.edwards.af.mil/weather/index.html 02/25/2004 16:57 LCL Rwy 4 Wind 216 Deg at 2 Kts Cross Wind 4 Kts Note the runway crosswind is reported higher than the wind velocity. I would be delighted if someone could explain this -specific- condition. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
http://www.edwards.af.mil/weather/index.html 02/25/2004 16:57 LCL Rwy 4 Wind 216 Deg at 2 Kts Cross Wind 4 Kts Note the runway crosswind is reported higher than the wind velocity. I would be delighted if someone could explain this -specific- condition. It's an error. It might be because the winds and the runway crosswind were measured at different points, or at different times, or because of errors in the math (roundoff several times?). Mathematically, the crosswind cannot be greater than the total wind. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Same as a sailboat.
Can go much faster than the wind. Karl |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Same as a sailboat. Can go much faster than the wind. Actually, sailing is different because of the interaction of the keel and the water. You can't go faster than hull speed, but ignoring that you could theoretically go faster than the wind, if you were going at 90 degrees to it. You can even sail INTO the wind. You can't, however, run before the wind faster than the wind (unless you have one humongus current) Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"Casey Wilson" wrote in message ...
(James L. Freeman) wrote in message . com... Can someone offer a non-mathematical EXPLANATION (as opposed to DESCRIPTION) of why the speed of headwind and crosswind components of a wind add up to more than the speed of the wind? Thanks. "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message om... Because wind has speed and direction. You cannot just add the numbers to get the total. You have to do a vector sum (considering direction and speed). I don't think that's the answer. When I run a wind problem on my Whiz-Wheel, the resultant IS a vector solution and the crosswind is only a fraction of the wind velocity. Something makes me want to say it is the cosine of the angle off the wing. Where you do think the cosine comes from? It is a consequence of adding two vectors. A 10 knot wind from the northwest has a westerly component of 10cos(45) = 7knots and a northerly component of 10cos(45) = 7knots. Alternatively, if you have 7 knots from the west and 7 knots from the north, you wind up with a total of 10 knots from the northwest, not 14 knots. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High wing to low wing converts...or, visa versa? | Jack Allison | Owning | 99 | January 27th 05 11:10 AM |
FS: Slick ignition components (O-540) | David Campbell | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | December 24th 03 02:56 AM |