A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

At Least He's Honest. Would This Attitude Have 'Saved' Light Airplane Business??



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 18th 04, 02:24 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default At Least He's Honest. Would This Attitude Have 'Saved' Light Airplane Business??

The following is one (high end audio) manufacturer's warning
boilerplate:


OK, You've been warned. This is a special experimental and/or
developmental product that does not belong in the hands of an ordinary
consumer. If you incur damage by ignoring this advice, just remember
that
you're dealing with Nevada corporations with no assets and no
insurance.

  #2  
Old December 18th 04, 04:22 PM
Denny
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Love it!... Yes, if more businesses structured this way ATLA would have
to lower it's annual membership dues to stay in business...

True story:
Stanley, is a person I know well enough to be privy to the inside
information... He manufactures and markets custom audio products
(primarily stereo amps, CB audio equipment, etc.) for retailers to sell
under private labels... Got served with a subpoena with a claim for
damages: severe injury, defective design, can't get it up anymore, loss
of consortium, yadda, yadda, etc... Stanley advised the attorney and
the judge that the product could not cause any injury unless horribly
misused, that the offshore corporation which actually owned the product
(legally he was merely an employee) had no insurance and no assets, and
did not intend to appear for deposition or court... Got served
multiple notices to court which 'the corporation' ignored... The judge
awarded a default judgement of many hundreds of thousands of dollars
(Stanley was told later that judge was literally in a rage over being
ignored - no sense of humor, tsk, tsk).. At this point the plaintiff
must have seen the handwriting on the wall because he bailed out,
signing over his part of the 'windfall' to the attorney as payment of
his fee... When the attorney tried to collect he was again informed
that there were no assets... The attorney marched into the factory
with a squad of deputy sheriffs and a paper stating that he owned the
company...

Fine, the production foreman said, smiled, put on his coat, and walked
out... The majority of the workers took one look at the big city,
weasel, lawyer - who was standing on a crate and yelling that they now
worked for him - put on their coats and followed the foreman...
Within hours the attorney found that the building was leased on a
monthly basis (8 days left to the next lease payment, bubba!) - the
machinery was leased (ditto) - the employees were from a national
temp-labor company (ditto)... There was not a scrap of paper, blue
print, production manual, order sheet, customer list, bills, etc., in
the factory - all this was performed by a separate corporation and
transmitted to work stations in the factory... When the foreman made
a single phone call from his car as he left (computers were also
leased), the internet connection hung up and the attorney was left with
nothing but blank screens.. The machined/molded/stamped parts and
circuit boards were made in Taiwan under an exclusive contract to a
Bahamian Corporation and not available to anyone else... In the end
all the plaintiff's attorney got was a bunch of bills and and a few
dozen completed amplifiers; as the new owner under the law (heh heh) he
inherited the assets (essentially zero) and the liabilities (lease and
labor bills now due), and no way to manufacture new product...

Within weeks Stanley had another factory up and running under another
corporation, producing an identical line of amplifiers for his private
label customers...

Denny

  #3  
Old December 19th 04, 12:06 AM
Dave S
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Denny wrote:

Love it!... Yes, if more businesses structured this way ATLA would have
to lower it's annual membership dues to stay in business...

True story:

(SNIP)

Within weeks Stanley had another factory up and running under another
corporation, producing an identical line of amplifiers for his private
label customers...

Denny


Yea... its a shame that Cessna, Piper and Grumman dont operate that way,
eh? (sardonic grin)

Dave

  #4  
Old December 19th 04, 02:19 PM
Denny
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Of course, a big ticket manufacturer is in a different ball game... Non
the less, if more businesse in the Untied States were structured so
that there are no deep pockets to go after, there would be a marked
diminishment in frivolous suits, including against the big guys...
There are attorneys who make a career out of looking for deep pockets
to sue - for a huge chunk of the judgement of course - knowing that
they will lose 9 suits out of every 10... But, that tenth suit is like
winning the lottery, Christmas, and having your rich uncle leave you
everything, all rolled into one... If the first nine deep pockets
aren't there the tenth suit is going to be fewer and farther between...
Grin right back at ya... Denny

  #5  
Old December 19th 04, 09:08 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Denny wrote:

Of course, a big ticket manufacturer is in a different ball game... Non
the less, if more businesse in the Untied States were structured so
that there are no deep pockets to go after, there would be a marked
diminishment in frivolous suits, including against the big guys...


We're working on it. It's called "offshoring."

George Patterson
The desire for safety stands against every great and noble enterprise.
  #6  
Old December 19th 04, 09:22 PM
LGHarlan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In the real world, Stanley would have lost all his private label customers as
soon as I filed a motion-under any of half a dozen pretexts-that allowed me to
deposition his customers' employees. Once he (and more importantly, they)
learned that the customers of any enterprise vaguely related to his previous
business were going to have their employees subjected to interrogatories and
depositions, he'd have to go to work at McDonalds.

Judges really, really, really hate being ignored.
  #7  
Old December 31st 04, 07:31 AM
Michael McKelvy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Denny" wrote in message
ups.com...
Of course, a big ticket manufacturer is in a different ball game... Non
the less, if more businesse in the Untied States were structured so
that there are no deep pockets to go after, there would be a marked
diminishment in frivolous suits, including against the big guys...


It could be solved just as easily by changing the law as it is in the U.K.
Loser Pays.

There are attorneys who make a career out of looking for deep pockets
to sue - for a huge chunk of the judgement of course - knowing that
they will lose 9 suits out of every 10... But, that tenth suit is like
winning the lottery, Christmas, and having your rich uncle leave you
everything, all rolled into one... If the first nine deep pockets
aren't there the tenth suit is going to be fewer and farther between...
Grin right back at ya... Denny

California just had a ballot initiative to get rid of a law that the hippies
in Sacramento wouldn't repeal. It allowed lawyers to on behalf of the
public, while all they really did was line their own pockets. One firm, The
Trevor Law Group was put out of business and it's lawyers disbarred because
of the way they used this law to go after small businesses and threaten them
with a law suit for some minor infraction or other. Is it any wonder so
many politicians are lawyers and that the Trial Lawyers are such big
contributors to the Democrats?


  #8  
Old December 19th 04, 11:38 PM
jls
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Denny" wrote in message
oups.com...
Love it!... Yes, if more businesses structured this way ATLA would have
to lower it's annual membership dues to stay in business...

True story:
Stanley, is a person I know well enough to be privy to the inside
information... He manufactures and markets custom audio products
(primarily stereo amps, CB audio equipment, etc.) for retailers to sell
under private labels... Got served with a subpoena with a claim for
damages: severe injury, defective design, can't get it up anymore, loss
of consortium, yadda, yadda, etc... Stanley advised the attorney and
the judge that the product could not cause any injury unless horribly
misused, that the offshore corporation which actually owned the product
(legally he was merely an employee) had no insurance and no assets, and
did not intend to appear for deposition or court... Got served
multiple notices to court which 'the corporation' ignored... The judge
awarded a default judgement of many hundreds of thousands of dollars
(Stanley was told later that judge was literally in a rage over being
ignored - no sense of humor, tsk, tsk).. At this point the plaintiff
must have seen the handwriting on the wall because he bailed out,
signing over his part of the 'windfall' to the attorney as payment of
his fee... When the attorney tried to collect he was again informed
that there were no assets... The attorney marched into the factory
with a squad of deputy sheriffs and a paper stating that he owned the
company...

Fine, the production foreman said, smiled, put on his coat, and walked
out... The majority of the workers took one look at the big city,
weasel, lawyer - who was standing on a crate and yelling that they now
worked for him - put on their coats and followed the foreman...
Within hours the attorney found that the building was leased on a
monthly basis (8 days left to the next lease payment, bubba!) - the
machinery was leased (ditto) - the employees were from a national
temp-labor company (ditto)... There was not a scrap of paper, blue
print, production manual, order sheet, customer list, bills, etc., in
the factory - all this was performed by a separate corporation and
transmitted to work stations in the factory... When the foreman made
a single phone call from his car as he left (computers were also
leased), the internet connection hung up and the attorney was left with
nothing but blank screens.. The machined/molded/stamped parts and
circuit boards were made in Taiwan under an exclusive contract to a
Bahamian Corporation and not available to anyone else... In the end
all the plaintiff's attorney got was a bunch of bills and and a few
dozen completed amplifiers; as the new owner under the law (heh heh) he
inherited the assets (essentially zero) and the liabilities (lease and
labor bills now due), and no way to manufacture new product...

Within weeks Stanley had another factory up and running under another
corporation, producing an identical line of amplifiers for his private
label customers...

Denny


Another one for Snopes.com although not quite as well-concocted or
believable.


  #9  
Old December 22nd 04, 03:22 PM
Denny
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Another one for Snopes.com although not quite as well-concocted or
believable
************************************************** *********************
Interesting how the real world is never neat and perfect, eh...
Cheers ...

Denny

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Citizens for Honest Fighter Pilots Open Letter To Media Otis Willie Military Aviation 3 September 18th 04 10:42 AM
Citizens for Honest Fighter Pilots - Anyone in Lt Bush's Moody AFB UPT Class Roger Helbig Military Aviation 5 August 13th 04 05:15 PM
Garmin GNS-530 for sale - Honest ! Dan Karshin Aviation Marketplace 3 July 19th 04 12:20 AM
Attitude indicators R&A Kyle Instrument Flight Rules 15 December 10th 03 06:56 PM
God Honest Naval Aviation 2 July 24th 03 04:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.