A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Better way than Wet Rates?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old October 31st 04, 01:27 AM
Darrel Toepfer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Aaron Coolidge wrote:

Mandatory insurance with (1) the town, (2) the FBO, (3) the comission
individually named was attempted at my home field last year. The backlash
was so intense from the pilot community that it was quickly dropped.
Several pilots made very effective presentations to the board of selectmen,
who were convinced of the futility of attempting to mandate this.


Well we're still trying to get the "owners" organized...
  #12  
Old October 31st 04, 07:13 AM
Tim Hogard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dude ) wrote:
: It sounds like he has the proper expectations financially, but what about
: enjoying the plane and liability?
Flight time costs so much now, I'm flying far less than I would
like to anyway thanks to ATC fees and landing fees.

: With 3 owners you are likely to be either using it too much to get much
: rent, or not getting enough time to enjoy it yourselves. Not insuring makes
: it likely to be profitable at low rental amounts, but...
I was considering not getting hull insurance.

: With no liability, how are you planning to protect your assets from when
: someone else flies it in to a school bus?
The field requires 2 million liability and the practice field
requires 5 million so thats required and will happen.

Big issue is how often someone is likly to break it in some way.
Since 99% of its flights will be for flight instruction or an owner,
it seems ot me that the risk compaired to the costs may be justified.
If anything bad happens including something fairly minor, the
insurance company will write it off and pay me book value... i.e.
nothing. In that case, I'm better off selling it as scrap my self
where I could get more out of it depending on what happended.
Insurance doesn't cover anything minor (Less than $2500), or major
(greater than its book value) so for the 4% of its hull value I'm
paying per year, I'm not getting much real insurance aginst things
that are likly to happen. After all how many claims are for between
$2500 and $15,000?

-tim
http://web.abnormal.com
  #13  
Old October 31st 04, 02:04 PM
Howard Nelson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



: With no liability, how are you planning to protect your assets from when
: someone else flies it in to a school bus?
The field requires 2 million liability and the practice field
requires 5 million so thats required and will happen.


Before pursuing this any further I think you had better check out the
liability insurance angle. You might find it difficult to get those limits
(at least smooth) written.

Howard


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.786 / Virus Database: 532 - Release Date: 10/29/2004


  #14  
Old November 1st 04, 03:41 AM
Tim Hogard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Howard Nelson ) wrote:
:
:
: : With no liability, how are you planning to protect your assets from when
: : someone else flies it in to a school bus?
: The field requires 2 million liability and the practice field
: requires 5 million so thats required and will happen.
:
: Before pursuing this any further I think you had better check out the
: liability insurance angle. You might find it difficult to get those limits
: (at least smooth) written.
It can be done. Its a 2 million policy with a rider that it goes up to 5 mil
at the one field.

-tim
http://web.abnormal.com
  #15  
Old November 2nd 04, 06:28 PM
Michael
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave Butler wrote
- your renters have no incentive to keep the mixture rich enough to preserve
your expensive engine.


I actually know a guy who owns an FBO and rented out his PA-30 with a
dry rate. The renter ran the engines at over 75% power, leaned to
peak. Took one long trip to destroy the engines.

Michael
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Revisiting lapse rates (From: How high is that cloud?) Icebound Instrument Flight Rules 5 November 26th 04 09:41 PM
Dillsburg freight rates to Europe Tom Home Built 0 May 31st 04 11:55 AM
Europe squadrons honored for high retention rates Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 January 10th 04 08:14 PM
Shop Labor Rates (here and there) Craig Prouse Owning 15 September 7th 03 12:24 AM
Trap rates for E-2 and C-2 types ? Pechs1 Naval Aviation 1 July 25th 03 06:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.