LPV only?

Apologies for the reply-to-self. Pulled the Send trigger a little to
quick:

On Oct 31, 11:39 pm, Jon wrote:
They
have been collecting SIS for at least a decade and know more about
all .

the details that are hapeening inside tho various 250-bit WAAS
messages continuously being broadcast, than just about anyone. To be
fair, some folks at Stanford, FAA, and of course, Raytheon, are right
up there as they were all key players, from Requirements on through to
Deployment; but the group at the TC are the ones that ran the initial
flight certification trials, ran the 60-day stability test prior to
IOC, and continue work with the bits/bytes day in and day out.

The periodic PAN reports are available for those that want to dig
deeper down, and perhaps for others that may have trouble falling
asleep at night : http://www.nstb.tc.faa.gov/ArchiveList.html

Regards,
Jon

On Oct 31, 1:27 pm, Doug Carter wrote:
Have any WAAS LPV approaches been established for runways that do not already
have an ILS in place? I'm presuming the limiting factor is LPV deployment is
clearing the approach airspace, lighting, runway length rather than drawing the
approach plate...

Does the FAA publish its priorities or a schedule of new/improved approaches?
--


My home airport at MGY has had an LPV for some time. We do not have an
ILS, but we do have a LOC approach.