A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Presidential TFR @ Kill Devil Hills



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old December 16th 03, 07:10 PM
Mutts
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article et
The Johnson administration chose a policy of not
sending Guard units to Vietnam,



I interpreted the intial post to imply that no guard units at all were sent.
Or Im reading too much into it and jumped to conclusion. Either way thanks for
clearing it up. You obviously have better info then I.
Just wanted to make sure that its clear that guard units did indeed get sent.
Is there evidence of Bushs volunteering for Vietnam duty? I have
heard this before but would like more information about it if possible.

Thanks

  #42  
Old December 16th 03, 09:22 PM
Paul Tomblin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In a previous article, "David Brooks" said:
I've been on the planet since George VI was King. That's two sovereigns!

Now *there* was an example of a dim bulb, ill-prepared for his role, who had
the style and character to lead a nation through an armed conflict. But he
had a lot of help from his PM.


At least, thank God, it wasn't his brother.


--
"The magic of usenet has never been its technology; and, only in part, its
reach. Its magic -- its power -- is based on the very real human connections
that form 'round its threads of conversation... the relationships that are
kindled, flamed and, on occasion, extinguished and mourned." -deCadmus
  #43  
Old December 16th 03, 09:25 PM
David Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Montblack" wrote in message
...

BTW, I've been on the planet since "Ike" was President. That's 10
presidents!!


I've been on the planet since George VI was King. That's two sovereigns!

Now *there* was an example of a dim bulb, ill-prepared for his role, who had
the style and character to lead a nation through an armed conflict. But he
had a lot of help from his PM.

-- David Brooks


  #44  
Old December 16th 03, 09:27 PM
Montblack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

("MikeM" wrote)
Bush is an IDIOT!



Bush has the great (double) misfortune of being:

1. One of our least intelligent Presidents.
2. Following one of the most intelligent Presidents this country has ever
had.

That said, IMHO, history will not be kind to Billary. Bush 43? Too early to
tell....

BTW, I've been on the planet since "Ike" was President. That's 10
presidents!!

(I'm claiming the Eisenhower administration too, even though I was only in
diapers in 1960)

--
Montblack
http://lumma.de/mt/archives/bart.gif


  #45  
Old December 16th 03, 09:55 PM
Gig Giacona
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Montblack" wrote in message
...
("MikeM" wrote)
Bush is an IDIOT!



Bush has the great (double) misfortune of being:

1. One of our least intelligent Presidents.


Do you have any proof to back up this statement?


2. Following one of the most intelligent Presidents this country has ever
had.


Or this one for that matter? I was a Lo-Cal TV reporter in Arkansas when he
was Gov here. I spoke with him on many occasions including a 30 minute
interview. While not an idiot he never struck me as particularly brilliant
in any way other than his ability to make every person in his audiance no
matter if there was 1 or 1000 think he was talking to them.



That said, IMHO, history will not be kind to Billary. Bush 43? Too early

to
tell....


It shouldn't be.



BTW, I've been on the planet since "Ike" was President. That's 10
presidents!!

(I'm claiming the Eisenhower administration too, even though I was only in
diapers in 1960)


You beat me by 1.


Gig


  #46  
Old December 16th 03, 10:14 PM
David Megginson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Paul Tomblin wrote:

Now *there* was an example of a dim bulb, ill-prepared for his role, who had
the style and character to lead a nation through an armed conflict. But he
had a lot of help from his PM.


At least, thank God, it wasn't his brother.


Given his brother's political sympathies, there would have been no conflict
between Britain and Germany, and thus, no need for the U.S. to go to war in
Europe. It's a scary thought that Europe probably owes its freedom to
Wallace Simpson.


All the best,


David

  #47  
Old December 16th 03, 10:53 PM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article qsGDb.18357$pY.9524@fed1read04, "R. Hubbell"
wrote:

He flew F-102 supersonic jet interceptors, on active duty in the USAF
and later in the Texas Air Guard.


How many hours did he log as PIC? Most pilots brag about that, in fact
most
consider that to be the defining metric.


what military pilots do you hang around with? I've never
met a military pilot that brags about hours.

--
Bob Noel
  #48  
Old December 16th 03, 10:53 PM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article KtGDb.18366$pY.5656@fed1read04, "R. Hubbell"
wrote:

He was flying F-102s.


Hours logged as PIC? Where's the bragging and the boasting? Military
pilots
wear their logged hours as a badge of honor.


what nonsense.

--
Bob Noel
  #49  
Old December 16th 03, 10:55 PM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article JsHDb.566151$Tr4.1535566@attbi_s03, "Michael 182"
wrote:

Everything can be analyzed on a continuium. Yes, President Bush did
server
in the National Guard. There is some question about his motives, hence
the
skepticism.


Several of my uncles joined rather than waiting to be drafted.
I guess you want to question their motives...

--
Bob Noel
  #50  
Old December 16th 03, 10:56 PM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , MikeM
wrote:

Does anyone else find it ironic that the President's very presence at
the celebration of 100 years of powered flight has shut down almost
2,000 square miles of airspace?


Bush is an IDIOT!


well, that certainly settles the issue.

--
Bob Noel
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lockheed wins Presidential helicopter contract Tiger Naval Aviation 0 January 29th 05 05:24 AM
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
What is the reasoning behind the smaller radius vice presidential TFR? Larry Dighera Piloting 38 November 19th 03 04:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.