A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sales of the MK IV set to triple - "bumper LLC" contemplates IPO



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 31st 09, 03:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,096
Default Sales of the MK IV set to triple - "bumper LLC" contemplates IPO

I see a new variant of the "MK IV yaw string" is required! From the DG
newsletter:

http://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/seitenfaden-e.html

The safety aware glider pilot will have one on the left and right,
effectively tripling the sales of the MK IV.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA
* Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly
  #2  
Old October 31st 09, 03:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Uncle Fuzzy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 260
Default Sales of the MK IV set to triple - "bumper LLC" contemplates IPO

On Oct 31, 8:17*am, Eric Greenwell wrote:
I see a new variant of the "MK IV yaw string" is required! From the DG
newsletter:

http://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/seitenfaden-e.html

The safety aware glider pilot will have one on the left and right,
effectively tripling the sales of the MK IV.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA
* Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly


Great! Hey Bumper! When's the stock going to be offered?
  #3  
Old November 1st 09, 03:46 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
bumper[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 19
Default Sales of the MK IV set to triple - "bumper LLC" contemplates IPO

On Oct 31, 8:41*am, Uncle Fuzzy wrote:
On Oct 31, 8:17*am, Eric Greenwell wrote:

I see a new variant of the "MK IV yaw string" is required! From the DG
newsletter:


http://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/seitenfaden-e.html


The safety aware glider pilot will have one on the left and right,
effectively tripling the sales of the MK IV.


--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA
* Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly


Great! *Hey Bumper! *When's the stock going to be offered?


After reading the following, you'll realize an IPO would be defrauding
our investors . . . Bumper LLC is less than worthless!

Bumper LLC is in a precarious position. Our team of attorneys advise
that condoning use of the MKIV as an AOA indicator would incur
liability for all future stall-spin accidents. If a side mounted MKIV
was installed on the accident aircraft, it would be held that the MKIV
failed to act in the intended manner, so as to indicate and warn of an
impending stall, thus was the proximate cause of the accident. If a
MKIV was *not* found to be installed, it would be suggest that "Bumper
LLC" was negligent in its duty to provide the MKIV for such use,
thereby contributing materially to the accident.

Overwhelmed by this potential liability, we have embraced deficit
spending and asked for a government bailout . . . after all, "Bumper
LLC is too small to fail".

You may want to order your new MKIV AOA indicator before we go
under . . . or not.

bumper
Quiet Vent & MKIV "high tech" yaw string
zz
Minden, NV







  #4  
Old November 1st 09, 04:03 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Darryl Ramm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,403
Default Sales of the MK IV set to triple - "bumper LLC" contemplates IPO

On Oct 31, 7:46*pm, bumper wrote:
On Oct 31, 8:41*am, Uncle Fuzzy wrote:

On Oct 31, 8:17*am, Eric Greenwell wrote:


I see a new variant of the "MK IV yaw string" is required! From the DG
newsletter:


http://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/seitenfaden-e.html


The safety aware glider pilot will have one on the left and right,
effectively tripling the sales of the MK IV.


--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA
* Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly


Great! *Hey Bumper! *When's the stock going to be offered?


After reading the following, you'll realize an IPO would be defrauding
our investors . . . Bumper LLC is less than worthless!

Bumper LLC is in a precarious position. Our team of attorneys advise
that condoning use of the MKIV as an AOA indicator would incur
liability for all future stall-spin accidents. If a side mounted MKIV
was installed on the accident aircraft, it would be held that the MKIV
failed to act in the intended manner, so as to indicate and warn of an
impending stall, thus was the proximate cause of the accident. If a
MKIV was *not* found to be installed, it would be suggest that "Bumper
LLC" was negligent in its duty to provide the MKIV for such use,
thereby contributing materially to the accident.

Overwhelmed by this potential liability, we have embraced deficit
spending and asked for a government bailout . . . after all, "Bumper
LLC is too small to fail".

You may want to order your new MKIV AOA indicator before we go
under . . . or not.

bumper
Quiet Vent & MKIV "high tech" yaw string
zz
Minden, NV


I think Bumper LLC ought to work on the Cobra Jack problem. I'd pay
hundreds of dollars for a high quality jack that just worked reliably.

Of course if we worked with the Minden airport to evict Bumper LLC
from its current corporate headquarters its gliders would actually had
to be assembled to fly (therefore using the hydraulic jack) then this
would probably get fixed very quickly.

Darryl
  #5  
Old November 1st 09, 05:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,096
Default Sales of the MK IV set to triple - "bumper LLC" contemplatesIPO

Darryl Ramm wrote:
I think Bumper LLC ought to work on the Cobra Jack problem. I'd pay
hundreds of dollars for a high quality jack that just worked reliably.

Of course if we worked with the Minden airport to evict Bumper LLC
from its current corporate headquarters its gliders would actually had
to be assembled to fly (therefore using the hydraulic jack) then this
would probably get fixed very quickly.


Perhaps the hydraulic jack could be removed and this electric jack
inserted in it's place, while retaining the rest of the ramp mechanical
system.

http://www.northerntool.com/webapp/w...5613_200325613

If it won't fit in the space of the hydraulic cylinder, it could be
mounted just ahead/behind of the ramp mechanism.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA
* Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

* "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org
  #6  
Old November 1st 09, 05:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dave Nadler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,610
Default Sales of the MK IV set to triple - "bumper LLC" contemplates IPO

On Nov 1, 12:33*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:
Darryl Ramm wrote:
I think Bumper LLC ought to work on the Cobra Jack problem. I'd pay
hundreds of dollars for a high quality jack that just worked reliably.


Of course if we worked with the Minden airport to evict Bumper LLC
from its current corporate headquarters its gliders would actually had
to be assembled to fly (therefore using the hydraulic jack) then this
would probably get fixed very quickly.


Perhaps the hydraulic jack could be removed and this electric jack
inserted in it's place, while retaining the rest of the ramp mechanical
system.

http://www.northerntool.com/webapp/w...roduct_6970_20...

If it won't fit in the space of the hydraulic cylinder, it could be
mounted just ahead/behind of the ramp mechanism.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA
* Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

* "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" atwww.motorglider.org


I dunno, lot's of people are very suspicious of electric things ;-)
See ya, Dave
  #7  
Old November 1st 09, 08:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Darryl Ramm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,403
Default Sales of the MK IV set to triple - "bumper LLC" contemplates IPO

On Nov 1, 9:37*am, Dave Nadler wrote:
On Nov 1, 12:33*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:



Darryl Ramm wrote:
I think Bumper LLC ought to work on the Cobra Jack problem. I'd pay
hundreds of dollars for a high quality jack that just worked reliably..


Of course if we worked with the Minden airport to evict Bumper LLC
from its current corporate headquarters its gliders would actually had
to be assembled to fly (therefore using the hydraulic jack) then this
would probably get fixed very quickly.


Perhaps the hydraulic jack could be removed and this electric jack
inserted in it's place, while retaining the rest of the ramp mechanical
system.


http://www.northerntool.com/webapp/w...roduct_6970_20...


If it won't fit in the space of the hydraulic cylinder, it could be
mounted just ahead/behind of the ramp mechanism.


--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA
* Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly


* "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" atwww.motorglider.org


I dunno, lot's of people are very suspicious of electric things ;-)
See ya, Dave


No think this is great, just think of all the things possible. We
could have ILEC make a controller. It could be user configurable with
different jack heights as a rigging aid. You could download that
configuration from a PC...

--

Sigh. I'd like a simple mechanical system. Hydraulic is the right
approach. Just implemented badly.

Darryl
  #8  
Old November 2nd 09, 04:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Papa3
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 444
Default Sales of the MK IV set to triple - "bumper LLC" contemplates IPO

On Nov 1, 3:14*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Nov 1, 9:37*am, Dave Nadler wrote:





On Nov 1, 12:33*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:


Darryl Ramm wrote:
I think Bumper LLC ought to work on the Cobra Jack problem. I'd pay
hundreds of dollars for a high quality jack that just worked reliably.


Of course if we worked with the Minden airport to evict Bumper LLC
from its current corporate headquarters its gliders would actually had
to be assembled to fly (therefore using the hydraulic jack) then this
would probably get fixed very quickly.


Perhaps the hydraulic jack could be removed and this electric jack
inserted in it's place, while retaining the rest of the ramp mechanical
system.


http://www.northerntool.com/webapp/w...roduct_6970_20....


If it won't fit in the space of the hydraulic cylinder, it could be
mounted just ahead/behind of the ramp mechanism.


--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA
* Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly


* "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" atwww.motorglider.org


I dunno, lot's of people are very suspicious of electric things ;-)
See ya, Dave


No think this is great, just think of all the things possible. We
could have ILEC make a controller. It could be user configurable with
different jack heights as a rigging aid. You could download that
configuration from a PC...

--

Sigh. I'd like a simple mechanical system. Hydraulic is the right
approach. Just implemented badly.

Darryl- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


My newish Komet trailer came with a very elegant manual jack using a
linear actuator setup (two small acme screw jacks connected by a
common crank). Avoids the mechanical advantage issues of a scissors
jack and the reliability/maintenance issues of the hydraulic.

Unfortunately, I let the jack go for a ratcheted scissors jack with a
foot pedal that's never worked right. Sigh.

P3
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Phrase "landing runway" vs. "cleared to land" Robert M. Gary Piloting 168 February 5th 08 05:32 PM
Phrase "landing runway" vs. "cleared to land" Robert M. Gary Instrument Flight Rules 137 February 5th 08 05:32 PM
Old polish aircraft TS-8 "Bies" ("Bogy") - for sale >pk Aviation Marketplace 0 October 16th 06 07:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.