If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Maj. Harry Schmidt's defense
from http://www.washtimes.com/national/inring.htm
Pilot's defense Air National Guard Maj. Harry Schmidt's defense team has filed a ream of pretrial motions as the court battle heats up in the antiterror war's most infamous case of fratricide. We obtained copies via an Air Force source. The Air Force has charged the F-16 pilot with dereliction of duty in the "friendly fire" bombing deaths of eight Canadian soldiers in April 2002 during the war in Afghanistan. In the motions, Maj. Schmidt's civilian and military attorneys want: - A public trial. The officer's pretrial Article 32 hearing was closed to the public. Defense attorneys want the court-martial opened so fellow fighter pilots can attend and report back to their units. "In this case, a number of appropriately cleared military fighter pilots have expressed an interest to the accused of attending his trial," the motion states. "They have been very frank in their concerns that Maj. Schmidt receive a fair trial because of the nature of the charge and the fact that the accident occurred in a combat zone on a combat mission, much like they have been or may be called upon to fly in the future." -Words struck. Maj. Schmidt's attorneys want the court to strike from the charging document the phrase "should have known." The phrase lowers the bar of proof the prosecution must meet to prove willful dereliction of duty. -The charge dismissed. The military court lacks jurisdiction over National Guardsmen because, they say, the law allowing the federal government to activate them is unconstitutional. -The charges set aside and appointment of a new officer, called a convening authority, to supervise the upcoming court-martial. Lt. Gen. Bruce Carlson, the current convening authority, veered from normal procedure, they say, by referring the charges for court-martial without first conferring with his staff judge advocate. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Home Built | 3 | May 14th 04 11:55 AM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
Airborne ballistic missile defense? | Henry J. Cobb | Military Aviation | 1 | August 20th 03 09:17 AM |