If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Legal Weather Sources?
There are "other" (private) weather services that if they predict
minimums on their TAF that are ok for you to go (part 135 and 23 etc), and the govt has them below min, you can use them and you are good to go. Some airlines use them. I do not know which ones or how they are "certified", but they do (or did) exist. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Legal Weather Sources?
On 28 Mar 2006 08:34:28 -0800, "Denny" wrote:
A recorded briefing from 1-800-wx brief puts the ball back on the feds side of the court if there is a legal dispute... The government has lost at least one suit by the pilot's widow over a briefer failing to fully inform the pilot... Recently I wanted only a specific piece of information from the briefer about fog along the lakeshore, but he wasn't having any of that... He insisted on going I request an "abbreviated briefing" and specify what I want. I haven't had them argue yet although I have had them ask for clarification. Usually I ask if there are any TFRs likely to pop up along the route, SUAs , and I may tell them I've already have the weather for the route and have been following DUATs for the past two days as well as the current maps. through wx, SA for the route of flight, forecast, winds aloft, notams, tfr, etc... I suspect their legal department had a warning out over condensed briefings... He ended with the usual VFR flight not recommended so what's new... I countered with "driving home after working a long shift not I've mentioned this one before, but... Maybe it was that the weather was so bad any way, but that time coming out of Kansans some years back when it was "expect ceilings 1500 or less, visibility 5 or less with both much less in many instances of heavy rain", followed by "have a good trip" for a VFR briefing. Surface winds were 30 G 50 and over a 100 knots at 500 feet with tornado watches out for the route and warnings out a bit farther. Around here it they would have said everything except, "don't go". OTOH I'd been talking with these guys regularly over the previous few days while flying in some "interesting" weather. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com recommended"... He laughed... denny |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Legal Weather Sources?
Peter wrote:
These sources may be "authorised" but is there anything in the FARs which makes the sourcing of weather data from other providers illegal? This is particularly relevant to N-reg aircraft flying outside the USA... they do that sometimes No one cares unless there is an accident or serious incident. If there is, which involves weather, and there is no record of an official briefing, the FAA can reasonable conclude that you failed to obtain the necessary preflight information. The burden is upon the pilot (or his estate~) to prove compliance when there is no FAA or approved vendor record. The biz jets that often fly outside the U.S. invaribly use one of the approved vendors on that FAA list. The U.S. air carriers have their own approved weather services so they are always covered. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Legal Weather Sources?
Peter wrote:
If there is, which involves weather, and there is no record of an official briefing, the FAA can reasonable conclude that you failed to obtain the necessary preflight information. The burden is upon the pilot (or his estate~) to prove compliance when there is no FAA or approved vendor record. I am not doubting you, but do you have a FAR reference for this? FAR 91.103 (a) Isn't the implicit burden apparent? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Legal Weather Sources?
On 2006-04-01, Sam Spade wrote:
No one cares unless there is an accident or serious incident. If there is, which involves weather, and there is no record of an official briefing, the FAA can reasonable conclude that you failed to obtain the necessary preflight information. So print out the weather from the 'unofficial' source, so when you do crash, they'll find your weather self-briefing in the wreckage. Of course, if you're dead it's not going to do you a lot of good, but at least you won't be posthumously convicted of not getting all the information... -- Dylan Smith, Port St Mary, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Legal Weather Sources?
"Dylan Smith" wrote in message ... On 2006-04-01, Sam Spade wrote: No one cares unless there is an accident or serious incident. If there is, which involves weather, and there is no record of an official briefing, the FAA can reasonable conclude that you failed to obtain the necessary preflight information. So print out the weather from the 'unofficial' source, so when you do crash, they'll find your weather self-briefing in the wreckage. Unless it burns up, blows away, gets drenched, etc. Leaving it at home is probably a better idea. (When we do Angel Flights, we have to mail the signed liability waivers before the flight rather than taking the waivers on the plane.) --Gary |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aviation Weather Workshop Locations for 2006! | scottd | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | December 10th 05 01:47 AM |
They are trying to remove your weather access | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 34 | June 29th 05 10:31 PM |
Senate Bill S.786 could kill NWS internet weather products | FlyBoy | Home Built | 61 | May 16th 05 09:31 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Home Built | 3 | May 14th 04 11:55 AM |
making the transition from renter to owner part 2 (long) | Journeyman | Piloting | 2 | April 15th 04 10:19 PM |