Zoom fables on ANN ZZZZZZZZZZZZ

In article ,
Juan Jimenez wrote:
[[ nothing worth repeating ]]


Hey Juan!!! remember this?

Newsgroups: rec.aviation.homebuilt
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 14:17:22 +0000
Subject: Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Quack, quack! It's all ab
out credibility you don't have, Duckboy!)


In article Z9Wyb.278857$ao4.989051@attbi_s51,
Juan..E.-Jimenez b*d&5^-@-*b(d)5+.!c#o$m wrote:
Don't forget, we're still waiting for the proof you'll never show, Duckboy!




Don't forget, we're *still* waiting for the proof that YOU'LL never show -- the
proof that you are *not* a liar and a fraud, yourself, Jimmy, baby.

You have repeatedly claimed that Chuck either:
A) Wasn't at SNF at all
B) Was there, but didn't have any vehicle there
C) Was there with a vehicle, but didn't own it.

You made the claim; the onus is on _you_ to provide proof.

If you don't have proof, you're a fraud.

If you're wrong, you're a liar.

Your ONGOING REFUSAL to address this issue goes to _your_ credibility.

At this point, you *don't* have ANY credibility on this issue, and as a
result of -that-, your credibility on _anything_else_ is also called into
question.

And the available evidence says that you're a LIAR AND A FRAUD.


Now, *prove*me*wrong*. If you _CAN_.

Show your proof.

If you can't/won't, you *are* _what_you_claim_ Chuck is.




We're *still* waiting for your proof.

Where is *YOUR* credibility??

lid wrote in
ervers.com:

snip!

Can't even get the story right, but then again that's par for the RAH
gaggle.

Go back and read the thread, then you'll find what you are looking for. You
might even learn a thing or two about credibility, you know, the kind it's
all about and he doesn't have?

From: Juan Jimenez

Juan, I have no dog in this fight, but I have seen Chuck and others provide
proof of their claims while you have not. Resorting to insults and innuendo
instead of making your case simply makes you appear to have no credibility.

What I would like to see you do is provide verifiable cites for your claims. If
you can't do that please stop with the innuendo, insults and "I don't want to
responds" and just back off.

Let's assume for the sake of discussion Chuck is all wrong. Your behaviour just
makes him look as if he is correct.

Let's change the assumption and say Chuck is correct. Your behaviour then
becomes untenable and quite possibly prosecutable.

Why not simply provide verifiable proofs for your accusations? Your abusive
responses are just childish and makes you look bad.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote in message ...
One of us is lying ,I can't prove a negative but he can prove (If he's telling
the truth) that I lost my kids in a custody trial it would be a matter of public
record.It would be simple to post that document. I know what and who he's
talking about ,same last name no relation. Same as if I would say that his kid
was fathered by a different man and offered no proof or said that because there
is another Jiminiz out there it must be his family. Sheesh what a joke and he
talks about credibility ,especially when he works for the least credible
publication out there.

Hey Chuck, if'n we're googling for your relatives, are you related to
her:
http://www.jurgita.com/models-id14811.html

I figure you must be. Same last name, same profession (you having
proved you were really a tshirt model)...

don't be shy, 'fess up

Sydney

And make sure you have proof of your relationship.

She's only 15. What's the age of consent in Ohio (or Poland)?

--
Bob (Chief Pilot, White Knuckle Airways)

I don't have to like Bush and Cheney (Or Kerry, for that matter) to love
America

"Snowbird" wrote in message
...


Hey Chuck, if'n we're googling for your relatives, are you related to
her:
http://www.jurgita.com/models-id14811.html

I figure you must be. Same last name, same profession (you having
proved you were really a tshirt model)...

don't be shy, 'fess up

Sydney

(B2431) wrote in
:

From: Juan Jimenez

Juan, I have no dog in this fight, but I have seen Chuck and others
provide proof of their claims while you have not.

No, you haven't. What you saw was Chuck twist and turn and come up with
little pieces of unrelated this and that, waiting for the thread to do the
usual usenet morph and then announce he's provided what's what asked,
counting on the fact that few people remember the original thread.

Unfortunately, that doesn't work with me. And since he continues his inane
attacks, I'll continue to remind him every once in a while that it's not
pleasant having someone forcefeed him his own BS. I can hear squealing, so
I know I hit my mark. Mission accomplished.

You've been repeating this little ditty of yours for quite some time. Get
over it, Dan.

Juan

From: Juan Jimenez
Date: 7/20/2004 4:04 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

(B2431) wrote in
:

From: Juan Jimenez

Juan, I have no dog in this fight, but I have seen Chuck and others
provide proof of their claims while you have not.

No, you haven't. What you saw was Chuck twist and turn and come up with
little pieces of unrelated this and that, waiting for the thread to do the
usual usenet morph and then announce he's provided what's what asked,
counting on the fact that few people remember the original thread.

Unfortunately, that doesn't work with me. And since he continues his inane
attacks, I'll continue to remind him every once in a while that it's not
pleasant having someone forcefeed him his own BS. I can hear squealing, so
I know I hit my mark. Mission accomplished.

You've been repeating this little ditty of yours for quite some time. Get
over it, Dan.

Juan


Juan, I still haven't heard your side. All I have seen is you doing exactly
what you accuse Chuck of doing. If you can't provide proof say so. If you have
proof I'd like to see it.

The original post in this thread was about campbell not you.


Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

(B2431) wrote in
:

From: Juan Jimenez
Date: 7/20/2004 4:04 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

(B2431) wrote in
:

From: Juan Jimenez

Juan, I have no dog in this fight, but I have seen Chuck and others
provide proof of their claims while you have not.

No, you haven't. What you saw was Chuck twist and turn and come up
with little pieces of unrelated this and that, waiting for the thread
to do the usual usenet morph and then announce he's provided what's
what asked, counting on the fact that few people remember the original
thread.

Unfortunately, that doesn't work with me. And since he continues his
inane attacks, I'll continue to remind him every once in a while that
it's not pleasant having someone forcefeed him his own BS. I can hear
squealing, so I know I hit my mark. Mission accomplished.

You've been repeating this little ditty of yours for quite some time.
Get over it, Dan.

Juan


Juan, I still haven't heard your side. All I have seen is you
doing exactly
what you accuse Chuck of doing. If you can't provide proof say so. If
you have proof I'd like to see it.

The original post in this thread was about campbell not you.

That's because you're not even remotely interested in my side, after it
having been pointed out to you, repeatedly, where to go read it. Simple
proof: this issue is not about any post in this thread.

So, this useless thread having reached the end of its life, is...

plonk!

I guess it's true what they say, useless people never change. You're living

proof of that. It's all about the credibility that you've never had.

Juan


You really shouldn't look in the mirror while you are typing replies. You
always end up talking about yourself when you do.


Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +

Bob,

It's my opinion that Jaun is a low life character assassin with
a penchant to smear those that confront him and/or his boss.


Barnyard BOb - All you get when you wrestle with a pig is get dirty.


I totally agree BOb, but that one was just too good to pass up.


Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)

In article , Snowbird says...
Hey Chuck, if'n we're googling for your relatives, are you related to
her:
http://www.jurgita.com/models-id14811.html

I figure you must be. Same last name, same profession (you having
proved you were really a tshirt model)...

don't be shy, 'fess up

Sydney

OK OK Syd ya got me, she must be a relation.Same last name lives in Poland and
a beauty. Now if you single guys are nice to me I can introduce you to her
LOL!!!

Your right I was in fact a fashion model years ago (for 2 shoots) that was when
I was a "hunk" now I'm a "chunk" :-)

see ya

Chuck s