If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Flight plan equipment suffix
Up till now I have been using the /G Flight plan equipment suffix. I
have IFR rated GPS Garmin 300XL + Narco 122D VOR/LOC/GS. But with the cost of Jeppesen $kybound service "skyrocketing" (30% jump in one year) I plan not to update the card full time and use GPS for VFR only - I am not wealthy nor IFR rated. What would be the appropriate equipment suffix? ----------------------------------------------------- SQ2000 canard http://www.abri.com/sq2000 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Flight plan equipment suffix
/U if so equipped.
http://www.faa.gov/ats/ato/rvsm_documentation.htm "abripl" wrote in message oups.com... Up till now I have been using the /G Flight plan equipment suffix. I have IFR rated GPS Garmin 300XL + Narco 122D VOR/LOC/GS. But with the cost of Jeppesen $kybound service "skyrocketing" (30% jump in one year) I plan not to update the card full time and use GPS for VFR only - I am not wealthy nor IFR rated. What would be the appropriate equipment suffix? ----------------------------------------------------- SQ2000 canard http://www.abri.com/sq2000 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Flight plan equipment suffix
Even if your GPS were current, but you do not plan on using it, don't
file /G. Use the next most appropriate one. You probably have a transponders, so use /U, or /A if you also have a DME. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Flight plan equipment suffix
"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message oups.com... Even if your GPS were current, but you do not plan on using it, don't file /G. Why not? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Flight plan equipment suffix
Because if the pilot declares an equipment as available, he should be prepared to use it. No point in saying you have something if you are not ready to use it. Are you suggesting that pilots should file /G even if they don't know how to operate the GPS? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Flight plan equipment suffix
"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message oups.com... Because if the pilot declares an equipment as available, he should be prepared to use it. No point in saying you have something if you are not ready to use it. Why wouldn't the pilot be unready to use it? The GPS still works, it's just that the database is not current. Are you suggesting that pilots should file /G even if they don't know how to operate the GPS? Are you suggesting that choosing not to keep the database current removes the pilot's knowledge of operating the GPS? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Flight plan equipment suffix
Why a pilot may not want to use an equipment for navigation is
irrelevant to the discussion. The point is that if he does not want to use it, then he should not file it. Not knowing how to operate a GPS is one example of why a pilot may elect to not use a GPS. I did not claim that database currency has anything to do with a pilot's knowledge of using a GPS. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Flight plan equipment suffix
abripl wrote:
I plan not to update the card full time and use GPS for VFR only - I am not wealthy nor IFR rated. What would be the appropriate equipment suffix? It costs $$$$ just to be able to file /G... I's like to but I can't justify it. I just don;t fly into that many places in bad weather where there isn't am ILS. Just file /U |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Flight plan equipment suffix
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 18:52:02 GMT, kontiki
wrote: abripl wrote: I plan not to update the card full time and use GPS for VFR only - I am not wealthy nor IFR rated. What would be the appropriate equipment suffix? It costs $$$$ just to be able to file /G... I's like to but I can't justify it. I just don;t fly into that many places in bad weather where there isn't am ILS. Just file /U Why would it cost anything to file /G on a VFR flight plan filed with FSS for purposes of S&R? There is no requirement for the GPS to be current for VFR flight. If it's working, /G should be perfectly appropriate in a VFR-only environment. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Flight plan equipment suffix
It doesn't cost anything to file it that way, but for VFR it is meaningless.
It just tells ATC that you have a really good backup for situational awareness. You cannot be issued clearance for an instrument approach if you are VFR. "Peter Clark" wrote in message ... On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 18:52:02 GMT, kontiki wrote: abripl wrote: I plan not to update the card full time and use GPS for VFR only - I am not wealthy nor IFR rated. What would be the appropriate equipment suffix? It costs $$$$ just to be able to file /G... I's like to but I can't justify it. I just don;t fly into that many places in bad weather where there isn't am ILS. Just file /U Why would it cost anything to file /G on a VFR flight plan filed with FSS for purposes of S&R? There is no requirement for the GPS to be current for VFR flight. If it's working, /G should be perfectly appropriate in a VFR-only environment. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
Real World Specs for FS 2004 | Paul H. | Simulators | 16 | August 18th 03 09:25 AM |