A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Flight plan equipment suffix



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 27th 05, 05:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Flight plan equipment suffix

Up till now I have been using the /G Flight plan equipment suffix. I
have IFR rated GPS Garmin 300XL + Narco 122D VOR/LOC/GS. But with the
cost of Jeppesen $kybound service "skyrocketing" (30% jump in one year)
I plan not to update the card full time and use GPS for VFR only - I am
not wealthy nor IFR rated. What would be the appropriate equipment
suffix?
-----------------------------------------------------
SQ2000 canard http://www.abri.com/sq2000

  #2  
Old November 27th 05, 05:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Flight plan equipment suffix

/U if so equipped.

http://www.faa.gov/ats/ato/rvsm_documentation.htm

"abripl" wrote in message
oups.com...
Up till now I have been using the /G Flight plan equipment suffix. I
have IFR rated GPS Garmin 300XL + Narco 122D VOR/LOC/GS. But with the
cost of Jeppesen $kybound service "skyrocketing" (30% jump in one year)
I plan not to update the card full time and use GPS for VFR only - I am
not wealthy nor IFR rated. What would be the appropriate equipment
suffix?
-----------------------------------------------------
SQ2000 canard http://www.abri.com/sq2000



  #3  
Old November 27th 05, 05:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Flight plan equipment suffix

Even if your GPS were current, but you do not plan on using it, don't
file /G. Use the next most appropriate one. You probably have a
transponders, so use /U, or /A if you also have a DME.

  #4  
Old November 27th 05, 08:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Flight plan equipment suffix


"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message
oups.com...

Even if your GPS were current, but you do not plan on using it, don't
file /G.


Why not?


  #5  
Old November 27th 05, 11:26 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Flight plan equipment suffix


Because if the pilot declares an equipment as available, he should be
prepared to use it. No point in saying you have something if you are
not ready to use it.

Are you suggesting that pilots should file /G even if they don't know
how to operate the GPS?

  #6  
Old November 28th 05, 05:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Flight plan equipment suffix


"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message
oups.com...

Because if the pilot declares an equipment as available, he should be
prepared to use it. No point in saying you have something if you are
not ready to use it.


Why wouldn't the pilot be unready to use it? The GPS still works, it's just
that the database is not current.



Are you suggesting that pilots should file /G even if they don't know
how to operate the GPS?


Are you suggesting that choosing not to keep the database current removes
the pilot's knowledge of operating the GPS?


  #7  
Old November 29th 05, 01:46 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Flight plan equipment suffix

Why a pilot may not want to use an equipment for navigation is
irrelevant to the discussion. The point is that if he does not want to
use it, then he should not file it.

Not knowing how to operate a GPS is one example of why a pilot may
elect to not use a GPS. I did not claim that database currency has
anything to do with a pilot's knowledge of using a GPS.

  #8  
Old November 27th 05, 06:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Flight plan equipment suffix

abripl wrote:
I plan not to update the card full time and use GPS for VFR only - I am
not wealthy nor IFR rated. What would be the appropriate equipment
suffix?


It costs $$$$ just to be able to file /G... I's like to but I can't justify
it. I just don;t fly into that many places in bad weather where there isn't
am ILS. Just file /U

  #9  
Old November 27th 05, 07:03 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Flight plan equipment suffix

On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 18:52:02 GMT, kontiki
wrote:

abripl wrote:
I plan not to update the card full time and use GPS for VFR only - I am
not wealthy nor IFR rated. What would be the appropriate equipment
suffix?


It costs $$$$ just to be able to file /G... I's like to but I can't justify
it. I just don;t fly into that many places in bad weather where there isn't
am ILS. Just file /U


Why would it cost anything to file /G on a VFR flight plan filed with
FSS for purposes of S&R? There is no requirement for the GPS to be
current for VFR flight. If it's working, /G should be perfectly
appropriate in a VFR-only environment.
  #10  
Old November 27th 05, 09:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Flight plan equipment suffix

It doesn't cost anything to file it that way, but for VFR it is meaningless.
It just tells ATC that you have a really good backup for situational
awareness. You cannot be issued clearance for an instrument approach if you
are VFR.

"Peter Clark" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 18:52:02 GMT, kontiki
wrote:

abripl wrote:
I plan not to update the card full time and use GPS for VFR only - I am
not wealthy nor IFR rated. What would be the appropriate equipment
suffix?


It costs $$$$ just to be able to file /G... I's like to but I can't

justify
it. I just don;t fly into that many places in bad weather where there

isn't
am ILS. Just file /U


Why would it cost anything to file /G on a VFR flight plan filed with
FSS for purposes of S&R? There is no requirement for the GPS to be
current for VFR flight. If it's working, /G should be perfectly
appropriate in a VFR-only environment.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Parachute fails to save SR-22 Capt.Doug Piloting 72 February 10th 05 05:14 AM
NAS and associated computer system Newps Instrument Flight Rules 8 August 12th 04 05:12 AM
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk Jehad Internet Military Aviation 0 February 7th 04 04:24 AM
Real World Specs for FS 2004 Paul H. Simulators 16 August 18th 03 09:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.