If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Carb heat: my new policy. Any comments
Lonnie wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... We have a similar thing going on right now in the Warbird community. After the McKitrick go around torque roll mort in his P51 last year, we have one very respected member of our community advocating making approaches in the P51 Mustang using cruise settings on the prop instead of the normal 2700RPM (Meto) setup used by pilots flying approach in this airplane. His theory is that on a go around, where torque is a huge issue on the Mustang if power is misused, keeping the prop in cruise won't hurt the engine if it's over boosted unintentionally and will deny the extremly high torque moment associated with the application of too much power too quickly. He maintains this "safety valve" will help save lives. I have a great respect for this pilot's opinion.....normally! As someone involved in the Mustang community as a safety adviser, I find his "theory" "interesting" to say the leat but I'm against it. Doing this flies in the face of the normal Dash 1 approved go around setup for the 51 which is to run the prop up to 2700 and DON'T ham hand the throttle if needed! It as well inserts a "crutch" for pilots flying this airplane that should NOT be needed. Proper checkout and proper handling of the airplane is the right approach to saving lives in the Mustang, NOT altering the way the airplane is normally flown to give those pilots flying it a "safety valve". I see a similarity in the approach to the two issues, the other being the use of carb heat here. -- Dudley Henriques Geeez Dudley, how the hell did you get from dropping carb heat on short final, to an essay like this in only two posts? Put the O2 mask back on. Well hello again Maxie. Never get tired of seeing your deeply incisive, informative and thoughtful posts. What's the deal with all the name changes though. Can't seem to make any sense out of why you bother doing it. Why not just post with the Maxwell moniker. Just wondering?? :-)) -- Dudley Henriques |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Carb heat: my new policy. Any comments
On Sep 8, 5:53*pm, wrote:
* * * * * * So some sort of weather information is mandatory, and that would include temp and dewpoint. There's no excuse for being surprised by carb ice. None at all. Like I tell my students, "You wouldn't dive into water without making sure there were no hazards in it that might injure you (hard or sharp pointy things under the surface, predators, and so on) and that it wasn't one degree above freezing. Why would we take off into air about which we know nothing? An awareness of carb ice conditions is one thing; but you are advocating teaching two different landing techniques as a result. To me that is too complex for students and unnecessary. Just keep it simple; use the same approach technique regardless of carb icing conditions. -Robert |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Carb heat: my new policy. Any comments
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... Well hello again Maxie. Never get tired of seeing your deeply incisive, informative and thoughtful posts. Well I wish I could say the same about you. But you always have to drift the thread around until it all about you. What's the deal with all the name changes though. Can't seem to make any sense out of why you bother doing it. Why not just post with the Maxwell moniker. Just wondering?? :-)) -- Dudley Henriques Only because the name Maxwell was too often forged. Maxwell was not my real name, so who cares, I'll just take another. I think thoughts and ideas are more important on the Usenet. But that's just me. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Carb heat: my new policy. Any comments
"Lonnie" @_#~#@.^net wrote in message
... "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... "Lonnie" @_#~#@.^net wrote in : "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... Lycomings, no problem with your plan at all. Continentals ice a bit more easily, and on a clear dry day, there won't be a problem either, though I'd be inclined to leave it on just a bit longer. I'd also get in the habit of pushing the carb heat in with the throttle if you go around.. Bertie Your a dumb ass. What next, practicing emergency landings by turning off the fuel? If you don't like an engines throttle response with carb heat on, turning off the carb heat is NOT the solution. Didn't say it was, fjukkktard. Bertie Liar. Are you so stupid you can't follow a thread one post long. Hey Okie, crank up that one brain cell and explain how he ever proposed such a solution to the problem you just pulled out of your a$$? Pushing in the carb heat with the throttle on a go around is taught by, hmmm let's see here 1,2,...251...carry the 4, uhm every friggin CFI on the face of the earth to every 2 hr+ student pilot on the face of the earth (assuming it was missed in the first hour). Jeez you are one dumb-as-a-day-old-dog-turd Okie, and only prove over and over again that you have exactly zip experience when it comes to planes that don't have a 101 keyboard and a mouse attached as standard equipment. I can see why you rarely offer anything of a substantive nature in this NG, which in your case demonstrates rare intelligence because you can't possibly do as much without stepping on your dork. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Carb heat: my new policy. Any comments
"Mike" wrote in message newsAlxk.733$Dj1.673@trnddc02... Bertie Liar. Are you so stupid you can't follow a thread one post long. Hey Okie, crank up that one brain cell and explain how he ever proposed such a solution to the problem you just pulled out of your a$$? Pushing in the carb heat with the throttle on a go around is taught by, hmmm let's see here 1,2,...251...carry the 4, uhm every friggin CFI on the face of the earth to every 2 hr+ student pilot on the face of the earth (assuming it was missed in the first hour). Jeez you are one dumb-as-a-day-old-dog-turd Okie, and only prove over and over again that you have exactly zip experience when it comes to planes that don't have a 101 keyboard and a mouse attached as standard equipment. I can see why you rarely offer anything of a substantive nature in this NG, which in your case demonstrates rare intelligence because you can't possibly do as much without stepping on your dork. Thanks for confirming that you can't either. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Carb heat: my new policy. Any comments
"Lonnie" @_#~#@.^net wrote in message
... "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... Well hello again Maxie. Never get tired of seeing your deeply incisive, informative and thoughtful posts. Well I wish I could say the same about you. But you always have to drift the thread around until it all about you. What's the deal with all the name changes though. Can't seem to make any sense out of why you bother doing it. Why not just post with the Maxwell moniker. Just wondering?? :-)) -- Dudley Henriques Only because the name Maxwell was too often forged. Maxwell was not my real name, so who cares, I'll just take another. I think thoughts and ideas are more important on the Usenet. But that's just me. So in other words, you'd rather be known for your singular rock hard stupidity rather than your first NG nym, which was a sock puppet to begin with. Do you really expect your delusional and incoherent ramblings to be interpreted as anything more than a monument to your stupidity? |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Carb heat: my new policy. Any comments
"Lonnie" @_#~#@.^net wrote in message
... "Mike" wrote in message newsAlxk.733$Dj1.673@trnddc02... Bertie Liar. Are you so stupid you can't follow a thread one post long. Hey Okie, crank up that one brain cell and explain how he ever proposed such a solution to the problem you just pulled out of your a$$? Pushing in the carb heat with the throttle on a go around is taught by, hmmm let's see here 1,2,...251...carry the 4, uhm every friggin CFI on the face of the earth to every 2 hr+ student pilot on the face of the earth (assuming it was missed in the first hour). Jeez you are one dumb-as-a-day-old-dog-turd Okie, and only prove over and over again that you have exactly zip experience when it comes to planes that don't have a 101 keyboard and a mouse attached as standard equipment. I can see why you rarely offer anything of a substantive nature in this NG, which in your case demonstrates rare intelligence because you can't possibly do as much without stepping on your dork. Thanks for confirming that you can't either. Ah yes, the old tried-and-true "I'm rubber, you're glue" line again. I'm sure you think you're quite the wit for employing that defense and to give credit where credit is due, you are half right. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Carb heat: my new policy. Any comments
"Mike" wrote in message news:MLlxk.736$Dj1.292@trnddc02... "Lonnie" @_#~#@.^net wrote in message ... "Mike" wrote in message newsAlxk.733$Dj1.673@trnddc02... Bertie Liar. Are you so stupid you can't follow a thread one post long. Hey Okie, crank up that one brain cell and explain how he ever proposed such a solution to the problem you just pulled out of your a$$? Pushing in the carb heat with the throttle on a go around is taught by, hmmm let's see here 1,2,...251...carry the 4, uhm every friggin CFI on the face of the earth to every 2 hr+ student pilot on the face of the earth (assuming it was missed in the first hour). Jeez you are one dumb-as-a-day-old-dog-turd Okie, and only prove over and over again that you have exactly zip experience when it comes to planes that don't have a 101 keyboard and a mouse attached as standard equipment. I can see why you rarely offer anything of a substantive nature in this NG, which in your case demonstrates rare intelligence because you can't possibly do as much without stepping on your dork. Thanks for confirming that you can't either. Ah yes, the old tried-and-true "I'm rubber, you're glue" line again. I'm sure you think you're quite the wit for employing that defense and to give credit where credit is due, you are half right. Then address the issue, dumb ass. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Carb heat: my new policy. Any comments
Lonnie wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... Well hello again Maxie. Never get tired of seeing your deeply incisive, informative and thoughtful posts. Well I wish I could say the same about you. But you always have to drift the thread around until it all about you. What's the deal with all the name changes though. Can't seem to make any sense out of why you bother doing it. Why not just post with the Maxwell moniker. Just wondering?? :-)) -- Dudley Henriques Only because the name Maxwell was too often forged. Maxwell was not my real name, so who cares, I'll just take another. I think thoughts and ideas are more important on the Usenet. But that's just me. That makes sense. Thanks for the explanation. On thread creep; there are actually two entirely seperate issues in play with this thread as I see it. One of the issues, and one that has been addressed by others as well as myself, is the issue of changing or altering a normal and or published procedure, in this case as the initial poster put it, "setting up a new SOP". What I'm dealing with is simply the "changing of normal procedure" issue. FWIW, I usually draw examples from either past or present personal experience when posting on these forums. I'm sorry you have chosen to see this as my "blowing my own horn". I assure you this is not now nor has it ever been my intention to do that. It's an unfortunate byproduct of Usenet that there will be those who for one reason or another, find someone as you appear to have found me. Sorry you feel this way. I'm fairly certain that under different circumstances, we might have had useful aviation related information to share with each other. -- Dudley Henriques |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Carb heat: my new policy. Any comments
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... That makes sense. Thanks for the explanation. On thread creep; there are actually two entirely seperate issues in play with this thread as I see it. One of the issues, and one that has been addressed by others as well as myself, is the issue of changing or altering a normal and or published procedure, in this case as the initial poster put it, "setting up a new SOP". What I'm dealing with is simply the "changing of normal procedure" issue. FWIW, I usually draw examples from either past or present personal experience when posting on these forums. I'm sorry you have chosen to see this as my "blowing my own horn". I assure you this is not now nor has it ever been my intention to do that. It's an unfortunate byproduct of Usenet that there will be those who for one reason or another, find someone as you appear to have found me. Sorry you feel this way. I'm fairly certain that under different circumstances, we might have had useful aviation related information to share with each other. Sorry, but that wasn't much help. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Carb Heat | [email protected] | Rotorcraft | 11 | April 30th 07 06:34 PM |
Carb Heat | vlado | Piloting | 9 | January 22nd 07 03:08 PM |
Use of Carb Heat | John Kirksey | Piloting | 4 | November 30th 04 07:26 PM |
Carb heat specs? | Rich S. | Home Built | 2 | November 13th 04 04:39 PM |
Cherokee Carb Heat. | Greg Esres | Piloting | 15 | July 29th 03 02:25 PM |