If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Near Vertical Takeoff
Skip the ad when you can to get to the video - looks like Grant County International Airport, near Moses Lake, Washington.
http://www.wsj.com/video/near-vertic...DBA8F2F54.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Near Vertical Takeoff
On Saturday, June 13, 2015 at 7:02:40 AM UTC+3, Roy Clark, "B6" wrote:
Skip the ad when you can to get to the video - looks like Grant County International Airport, near Moses Lake, Washington. http://www.wsj.com/video/near-vertic...DBA8F2F54.html In reality, I believe it's around 50 degrees. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Near Vertical Takeoff
On Saturday, June 13, 2015 at 5:22:34 AM UTC-4, Bruce Hoult wrote:
On Saturday, June 13, 2015 at 7:02:40 AM UTC+3, Roy Clark, "B6" wrote: Skip the ad when you can to get to the video - looks like Grant County International Airport, near Moses Lake, Washington. http://www.wsj.com/video/near-vertic...DBA8F2F54.html In reality, I believe it's around 50 degrees. Not something you would see with passengers inside! I would love to see a side view of that climb, I wonder how fast it's shedding speed? Nice wing bend though. ;-) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Near Vertical Takeoff
From CNN: "Hero pilot saves the day."
From a passenger interviewed in the terminal: "We almost died!" I can do that in my glider, though not for quite as long... On 6/13/2015 6:13 AM, Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot) wrote: On Saturday, June 13, 2015 at 5:22:34 AM UTC-4, Bruce Hoult wrote: On Saturday, June 13, 2015 at 7:02:40 AM UTC+3, Roy Clark, "B6" wrote: Skip the ad when you can to get to the video - looks like Grant County International Airport, near Moses Lake, Washington. http://www.wsj.com/video/near-vertic...DBA8F2F54.html In reality, I believe it's around 50 degrees. Not something you would see with passengers inside! I would love to see a side view of that climb, I wonder how fast it's shedding speed? Nice wing bend though. ;-) -- Dan Marotta |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Near Vertical Takeoff
LOL @ DAn.
Awesome! Goes to show without all the ballast (human bodies) these planes have plenty of extra power. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Near Vertical Takeoff
On Sunday, June 14, 2015 at 6:27:10 PM UTC+3, PBA wrote:
LOL @ DAn. Awesome! Goes to show without all the ballast (human bodies) these planes have plenty of extra power. There's also the regulation that large twins have to be able to continue a takeoff from V1 [1] on a single engine at max all-up weight and the given runway length, wind, temp etc. If you actually have twice that trust, as you usually do, it's jam. I note that the A380 has an *extremely* leisurely climb out compared to the modern twins. It only has to have 33% more than the bare minimum power, compared to 100% more for twins. [1] if an engine fails below V1 then you stop. If above V1 then you continue, but you must accelerate to at least V2 before actually lifting off. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Near Vertical Takeoff
Yup - that's how they calculate Balanced Field Length. IIRC it's where the distance to get to V1 (takeoff decision speed), abort and stop equals the distance to continue the takeoff on one engine to 50' altitude. After V1 it takes more distance to stop than to continue on one engine.
9B |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Near Vertical Takeoff
With all that extra thrust, we routinely set reduced power for takeoff.
We had a chart in the performance section of the flight manual for just a thing. It considered runway length, density altitude, gross weight, winds, etc. Should an engine fail, the remaining engine(s) would be advanced to max power. On 6/14/2015 10:59 AM, Bruce Hoult wrote: On Sunday, June 14, 2015 at 6:27:10 PM UTC+3, PBA wrote: LOL @ DAn. Awesome! Goes to show without all the ballast (human bodies) these planes have plenty of extra power. There's also the regulation that large twins have to be able to continue a takeoff from V1 [1] on a single engine at max all-up weight and the given runway length, wind, temp etc. If you actually have twice that trust, as you usually do, it's jam. I note that the A380 has an *extremely* leisurely climb out compared to the modern twins. It only has to have 33% more than the bare minimum power, compared to 100% more for twins. [1] if an engine fails below V1 then you stop. If above V1 then you continue, but you must accelerate to at least V2 before actually lifting off. -- Dan Marotta |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Near Vertical Takeoff
I can do that in my glider, though not for quite as long... Yes you can! Do a winch launch on one of those specially modified European winches that use over 11,000ft of line, hold that climb for 2 minutes and end up at over 4,500ft. I bet the jet cannot do that! Uli |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Near Vertical Takeoff
Wow!!! I'd love to try that!
On 6/14/2015 7:36 PM, GM wrote: I can do that in my glider, though not for quite as long... Yes you can! Do a winch launch on one of those specially modified European winches that use over 11,000ft of line, hold that climb for 2 minutes and end up at over 4,500ft. I bet the jet cannot do that! Uli -- Dan Marotta |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
vertical 1_0.jpg | troy24 | Aviation Photos | 13 | January 18th 11 01:54 PM |
Vertical stabilizers | Dallas | Piloting | 20 | March 2nd 10 03:43 AM |
Head wind takeoff into rising hills, or crosswind takeoff to open space ?? | P S | Piloting | 7 | September 20th 07 07:29 PM |
Vertical and Short Takeoff / Landing Fighters | Aviation | Naval Aviation | 7 | January 5th 04 08:49 PM |
Vertical and Short Takeoff / Landing Fighters | Aviation | Military Aviation | 6 | January 5th 04 01:18 PM |