If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Gottlieb" wrote:
To them, small GA planes are an annoyance and in order to make their target minimum profit per plane they have to either charge a large amount for fuel or hit you with a significant ramp fee... ...One of the line guys said it was very quiet there with not many planes showing up. See, that's what I don't understand: I've never been in an FBO that I would describe as "busy." Why would they want to discourage our business? -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Gary L. Drescher" wrote in message et... "Tom S." wrote in message ... "Gary L. Drescher" wrote in message et... "Tom S." wrote in message ... "Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message news The FBO is Signature; I stopped (place was fairly empty, there was only one other plane there that was not tied down), went in, looked at the weather terminal, called FSS, and went back to the door. Surprise! It was locked. I pressed buttons, nothing. Then a lady came to the counter and informed me there was a $22 fee for coming there and I could leave as soon as I paid it. Most places that's called "unlawful detention". Only if the front door's locked too. In reading it again, I don't see any other door mentioned. Well, there's no mention of walls either, so I guess Peter could've just walked around the locked door. There might have been an unlocked front door but the only door to the ramp (and my plane!) was definitely locked. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Rosspilot" wrote in message ... If I ever find myself stopping at Signature again I am sure as heck getting my money's worth out of them in services. Hard to eat $22 worth of popcorn. G True, even at movie theater prices. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Peter Gottlieb wrote:
There might have been an unlocked front door but the only door to the ramp (and my plane!) was definitely locked. In most places in the USA it's illegal for an exit door to be locked during business hours. Violates the fire code. -- Jim carry on |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike Rapoport" wrote
More likely because its unprofitable. Probably. So for everyone in the area - here's how you can get back at them. Thinking about shooting some practice approaches? MMU is a good place for it. Thinking of going someplace to get those controlled field landings in? Maybe some pattern work? MMU is a good place for it. Controller status (including pay) is determined by the NUMBER of operations at the facility, not the type. Every time that controller tells you "Cleared for touch&go" that's two operations. A good controller can really keep that pattern hopping. Of course that's exactly the kind of place the bizjet pilot prefers to avoid - and he's the guy Signature is depending on. So make it a point to make MMU the center for student training. Get that operations count up. The controllers will love you. As for Signature - well, they don't care about us, so why should we care about them? Michael |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
I think my answer fits better. Given fixed costs, etc., how would selling 50
gallons instead of 300 gallons be "unprofitable"? It's not like the "big iron" is going to have to wait in line and then leave. I've seen quite a few snotty FBO's when we were flying a Twin Commander 690. Ego and the American work ethic. "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message ... More likely because its unprofitable. Mike MU-2 See, that's what I don't understand: I've never been in an FBO that I would describe as "busy." Why would they want to discourage our business? Ego. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Jim Herring wrote in message ...
Peter Gottlieb wrote: There might have been an unlocked front door but the only door to the ramp (and my plane!) was definitely locked. In most places in the USA it's illegal for an exit door to be locked during business hours. Violates the fire code. I've seen this quite a bit recently. Not to extract $$s from pilots, but by order of the TSA on ramps that serve both GA and commercial traffic. I don't think the TSA worries about fire codes. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"John Galban" wrote in message
om... Jim Herring wrote in message ... Peter Gottlieb wrote: There might have been an unlocked front door but the only door to the ramp (and my plane!) was definitely locked. In most places in the USA it's illegal for an exit door to be locked during business hours. Violates the fire code. I've seen this quite a bit recently. Not to extract $$s from pilots, but by order of the TSA on ramps that serve both GA and commercial traffic. I don't think the TSA worries about fire codes. Large airports have always locked passenger-terminal doors that open onto the ramp. I doubt there's any fire-code violation, as long as they're not marked as exit doors and as long as enough unlocked, marked exit doors exist. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 21:17:42 -0500, Jim Herring
wrote: Peter Gottlieb wrote: There might have been an unlocked front door but the only door to the ramp (and my plane!) was definitely locked. In most places in the USA it's illegal for an exit door to be locked during business hours. Violates the fire code. True, but on all of the airports that have commercial traffic I think you will find any door to the ram from the outside to be locked. I know that all are at MBS and you need an escort to your plane. Roger Halstead (K8RI EN73 & ARRL Life Member) www.rogerhalstead.com N833R World's oldest Debonair? (S# CD-2) |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message ... More likely because its unprofitable. Perhaps unprofitable compared to the higher end of GA and based on the number of "transactions," however, I do not believe the $22 fee maximizes their income. A lower fee would result in enough extra volume to pull in more revenue. My visit there cost them nothing at all as I used no consumables. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Naval Air Refueling Needs Deferred in Air Force Tanker Plan | Henry J Cobb | Military Aviation | 47 | May 22nd 04 03:36 AM |
Seat belt tags | Stephen Stilkey | Owning | 28 | March 15th 04 04:29 PM |
Stryker/C-130 Pics | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 186 | October 8th 03 09:18 AM |
Flyong from Toronto (Ontario) to Pitsburg Intl | Anthony Acri | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | July 26th 03 05:28 PM |