If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Settle a bet: Mach speeds
When knowledgeable people speak of a vehicle going "X Mach" they are
referencing the speed of the vehicle compared to the speed of sound at local conditions, right? I ask because I've heard NASA folks mentioning that the Shuttle, at some point in it's descent, is going Mach 25. I claim that means the vehicle is going 25 times faster than Mach at that particular pressure and temp where the Shuttle is, while someone else claims NASA means 25 times the sea level value of Mach, even though the Shuttle is in the very upper atmosphere at the time. I know to discount what reporters say, but I'm referring to engineers and their official spokesmen. BTW, I understand the definition of Mach references local conditions. -- Scott -------- It's not a coincidence that pictures that would inflame the Americans to war are not shown extensively while those pictures that undermine our will to fight are shown ad naseum. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"tscottme" writes: When knowledgeable people speak of a vehicle going "X Mach" they are referencing the speed of the vehicle compared to the speed of sound at local conditions, right? I ask because I've heard NASA folks mentioning that the Shuttle, at some point in it's descent, is going Mach 25. I claim that means the vehicle is going 25 times faster than Mach at that particular pressure and temp where the Shuttle is, while someone else claims NASA means 25 times the sea level value of Mach, even though the Shuttle is in the very upper atmosphere at the time. Upper atmosphere conditions vary quite a bit. The upper atmosphere absorbs quite a bit of Solar Radiation, and gets relatively warm in the process. So - the speed associated with Mach 1 varies. To keep things in the FLight Control System (and the Public Releations Office) as uncomplicated as possible, but still accurate enough, NASA uses a sylized value of 1,000 ft/sec as Mach 1 at the very high (Peak Heating Region) altitudes. The true value for the speed of sound wanders back and forth across 1,000 ft/sec at those heights, but not by much. The Speed of Sound at Sea Leve, on a Standard (29.92"Hg Pressure, 59 Deg F - 1013 mBar/15C) is about 1115 ft/sec. So, while the number is a little bit arbitrary, it's still related to local conditions, and not Sea Level conditions. -- Pete Stickney A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures. -- Daniel Webster |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
thanks Peter
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
NASA uses a sylized value of 1,000 ft/sec as Mach 1 at the very high (Peak Heating Region) altitudes. This is why I stay faithful to this newsgroup despite all the insane postings during election years. You never know when you're going to come across some wonderful, useless bit of information like this. I wish the people in the local cocktail circuit were more tuned in to air & space. Then I could ambush somebody with this factoid. Thank you, Pete! all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com Viva Bush! blog www.vivabush.org |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
NASA uses a sylized value of 1,000 ft/sec as Mach 1 at the very high (Peak Heating Region) altitudes. I wish the people in the local cocktail circuit were more tuned in to air & space. Then I could ambush somebody with this factoid. all the best -- Dan Ford Well, Dan you just have to wait till someone says, "Boy, we've been having some hot weather recently!" Whereupon you respond, "Speaking of 'hot,' did you know that at the Peak Heating Region..... vince norris |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I think that value should be 100 ft/sec. Mach one is about 600 Knots = 1
NM/Min. One NM = 6,000'. Divide 6,000 by 60 (seconds in a minute) and you get 100, not 1,000. -- B-58 Hustler History: http://members.cox.net/dschmidt1/ - "vincent p. norris" wrote in message ... NASA uses a sylized value of 1,000 ft/sec as Mach 1 at the very high (Peak Heating Region) altitudes. I wish the people in the local cocktail circuit were more tuned in to air & space. Then I could ambush somebody with this factoid. all the best -- Dan Ford Well, Dan you just have to wait till someone says, "Boy, we've been having some hot weather recently!" Whereupon you respond, "Speaking of 'hot,' did you know that at the Peak Heating Region..... vince norris |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
1083 fps @ 59F, Sea Level, hypothetically dry atmosphere. STP, Standard
Temperature & Pressure. In std water, about 4800 fps. Al "Darrell" wrote in message news:M7Mqc.31369$Md.30236@lakeread05... I think that value should be 100 ft/sec. Mach one is about 600 Knots = 1 NM/Min. One NM = 6,000'. Divide 6,000 by 60 (seconds in a minute) and you get 100, not 1,000. -- B-58 Hustler History: http://members.cox.net/dschmidt1/ - "vincent p. norris" wrote in message ... NASA uses a sylized value of 1,000 ft/sec as Mach 1 at the very high (Peak Heating Region) altitudes. I wish the people in the local cocktail circuit were more tuned in to air & space. Then I could ambush somebody with this factoid. all the best -- Dan Ford Well, Dan you just have to wait till someone says, "Boy, we've been having some hot weather recently!" Whereupon you respond, "Speaking of 'hot,' did you know that at the Peak Heating Region..... vince norris |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In message M7Mqc.31369$Md.30236@lakeread05 - "Darrell"
writes: I think that value should be 100 ft/sec. Mach one is about 600 Knots = 1 NM/Min. One NM = 6,000'. Divide 6,000 by 60 (seconds in a minute) and you get 100, not 1,000. I think you made a mistake at the very beginning: 600 knots = 600 MN/Hour = 600 NM/3600 Sec = 1/6 NM/Sec = 6000/6 ft/Sec = = 1000 ft/Sec. BTW, I think at sea level Mach 1 is around 660 Knots (at some "average" temperature). HTH, ************************************************** **************************** * Arie Kazachin, Israel, e-mail: * ************************************************** **************************** NOTE: before replying, leave only letters in my domain-name. Sorry, SPAM trap. ___ .__/ | | O / _/ / | | I HAVE NOWHERE ELSE TO GO !!! | | | | | | | /O\ | _ \_______[|(.)|]_______/ | * / \ o ++ O ++ o | | | | | \ \_) \ | \ | \ | \ | \ | \ | \ | \_| |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
In article M7Mqc.31369$Md.30236@lakeread05,
"Darrell" writes: I think that value should be 100 ft/sec. Mach one is about 600 Knots = 1 NM/Min. One NM = 6,000'. Divide 6,000 by 60 (seconds in a minute) and you get 100, not 1,000. Darryl, It's a good thing they had somebody behind you with the map 600 Kts is 10 Nautical Miles/minute, not 1. BTW, you'd probably know this: Is theere any truth to the story that a B-58 got itself into some manner of perdicament up over Alaska, near one of the airbases. (For the same of Argument, I'll say Eielson, but I don't know) The Pilot was busy trying to keep teh airplane flying, and things were kinda touchy. While things were gyrating, the Nav tried calling the Pilot & DSO, and for some reason (Either they were busy trying to save the airplane, or the ICM wasn't working too well) didn't answer. The Nav got nervous & punched out, right near one of the Base Rescue helicopters, which scooped him up & ran for home. In the meantime, the Pilot got things under control, & managed to get it on the ground at this Alaskan base. As he clumb down teh ladder, he was met by the irate Nav, who was screaming at him "Why didn't you tell me where we were! I'm teh Navigator, dammit, and I have a right to know!" -- Pete Stickney A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures. -- Daniel Webster |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Al Gerharter" wrote in message ws.com...
1083 fps @ 59F, Sea Level, hypothetically dry atmosphere. STP, Standard Temperature & Pressure. In std water, about 4800 fps. Al SNIP For quick and dirty (in one's head) cruise calculations I always used 1.0 Mach = 600 kts. (It's closer to 610 at -57F) but that let me, for example, say .8M was 8 miles a minute. On the deck, about 670 (11 m/min). That and using fuel flow per minute (3000pph - 50ppm) gave me rough figures. Of course, if things looked tight, then I used the whiz-wheel. BTW, on the deck 760 mph is close to .1M (STP), so when your car is showing 76 mph, you're buzzing along at about .1M. (For interstate travel, 75 mph is 12.5 miles in 10 minutes . . . we just completed about 6000 miles of driving where I used this sort of mental T=D/R to predict ETAs thus boggling my better half. Same sort of calcs can be used ina light plane such as C152 . . . 6gph = 1 gal in 10 min, 90KTS = 1.5 nm/min; 120(tailwind)=2 nm/min. As above, use the calculator if things look tight. (If they do you've screwed up.) Walt BJ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
max altitude and Mach 1 Now With Charts | John R Weiss | Military Aviation | 6 | May 15th 04 05:49 PM |
F-22 Comparison | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 39 | December 4th 03 04:25 PM |
WWII warplanes vs combat sim realism | [email protected] | Military Aviation | 37 | November 27th 03 05:24 AM |
The Wright Stuff and The Wright Experience | John Carrier | Military Aviation | 54 | October 12th 03 04:59 AM |
Me-262, NOT Bell X-1 Broke SB First | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 140 | October 10th 03 08:02 PM |