Your free AvGas fillup at Dodge Center MN (TOB) July Sunday 31, AM

"John Larson" wrote in message
...
AOPA has every reason to inflate the numbers. I wonder what the FAA says.

lol...

AOPA doesn't make up those numbers. They are just putting the official FAA
numbers on a web site for you.

In other words, when "AOPA says 618K", what that really means is "the FAA
says 618K".

Duh.

You won your bet (618K is less than 750K), but you still see a need to
dispute the facts. Even when you obviously don't understand where the facts
being presented are coming from. Very funny.

Pete

"John Larson" wrote in message
...
That is an excellent point.

What is?

I have had a couple of do-gooder posters chew me out for maintaining that
this guy was accusing someone of the board of stealing his gasoline

A well-deserved chewing out, IMHO.

- yet clearly these guys didn't take the time to read the original posters
Subject line.

Please quote the portion of the subject line that represents an accusation
of theft.

Pete

I'll bite. (And without the pointless childish petulant wording, i.e "lol,
Duh.")

If the AOPA puts the information out, and claims it is their information, it
comes from the AOPA.

Is that fair?


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"John Larson" wrote in message
...
AOPA has every reason to inflate the numbers. I wonder what the FAA says.

lol...

AOPA doesn't make up those numbers. They are just putting the official
FAA numbers on a web site for you.

In other words, when "AOPA says 618K", what that really means is "the FAA
says 618K".

Duh.

You won your bet (618K is less than 750K), but you still see a need to
dispute the facts. Even when you obviously don't understand where the
facts being presented are coming from. Very funny.

Pete

It's implied, just like most of the crap on this board.

Do you understand now?


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"John Larson" wrote in message
...
That is an excellent point.

What is?

I have had a couple of do-gooder posters chew me out for maintaining that
this guy was accusing someone of the board of stealing his gasoline

A well-deserved chewing out, IMHO.

- yet clearly these guys didn't take the time to read the original
posters Subject line.

Please quote the portion of the subject line that represents an accusation
of theft.

Pete

("Matt Barrow" wrote)
Maybe if you'd read more of my posts before shooting your mouth off you'd
realize that.


I suggest his earlier posts... as in not this past year.


Montblack

"John Larson" wrote in message
...
I'll bite. (And without the pointless childish petulant wording, i.e "lol,
Duh.")

lol. Duh. Not words one uses every day, of course...but they seemed
perfectly at home replying to your post.

If the AOPA puts the information out, and claims it is their information,
it comes from the AOPA.

"Claims it is their information"? I suppose by "claims", you're referring
to the spot right at the top of the web page where it says "Source: FAA".
Is that the claim you're talking about?

Is that fair?

If AOPA actually did all the things you said they did, then it'd be fair to
say it comes from AOPA. But they didn't, so it's not.

Pete

"John Larson" wrote in message
...
It's implied, just like most of the crap on this board.

Where is it implied? What part of the subject line implies theft?

Do you understand now?

Nope.

("John Larson" wrote)
I'll bite. (And without the pointless childish petulant wording, i.e "lol,
Duh.")


Whatever.


Montblack

John Larson wrote:
It's implied, just like most of the crap on this board.

You sound like my first wife. She could read anything into "hello."

George Patterson
Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to
use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks.

George Patterson wrote:
John Larson wrote:

It's implied, just like most of the crap on this board.


You sound like my first wife. She could read anything into "hello."

Har! Now that we've declined into mostly he-said-she-said, you're-stupid,
did-too/did-not and why-can't-you-read, this one at least got me to laugh. I
think I married her after you. Thanks, George.

Dave