VOR technigue, don't overshoot

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...

So you advocate violence? Do you feel frustrated?

Stepped right in it again.

Anthony, what did your last post have to do with aviation? I thought you
were immune to the opinions of others, and didn't care what others thought?

No matter how much you read or think you know, you have no credibility since
you have zero experience, and this applies to law, medicine, flying, or
breast feeding.

"Viperdoc" wrote in message
...
Anthony, what did your last post have to do with aviation? I thought you
were immune to the opinions of others, and didn't care what others
thought?

No matter how much you read or think you know, you have no credibility
since
you have zero experience, and this applies to law, medicine, flying, or
breast feeding.

He's about as predictable as gravity, and pretty easily provoked to show off
his ignorance.

Mxsmanic wrote:
Beauciphus writes:


If a student was continuously disrupting the class, it wouldn't be up to the
real students to respond. The disruptive student would be banned from
further participation.


Are constant personal attacks directed at other students disruptive?


If, for some reason, the administration refused to act to remove the
disruption, the students would be justified in taking it upon themselves to
remove the disruption.


How would they go about that?


The short answer is that you would get you ass kicked one way or another.


So you advocate violence? Do you feel frustrated?

Where did he advocate violence. The only violence is that committed by
you, the loud, unqualified imposter.

Viperdoc wrote:

Anthony, what did your last post have to do with aviation? I thought you
were immune to the opinions of others, and didn't care what others thought?

No matter how much you read or think you know, you have no credibility since
you have zero experience, and this applies to law, medicine, flying, or
breast feeding.


But, he is very good at eating Pizza.

Mxsmanic wrote:

Sam Spade writes:


Help me understand RNP SAAAR sir. What is the difference between RNP
0.10 and RNP 0.30 in the minimums boxes of the IAP?


Sir, the minimums to be used are those corresponding to the RNP for which the
crew, operator, and aircraft are authorized. Thus, if the crew, operator, and
aircraft are authorized for a RNP of 0.10, they will use the minimums
associated with that RNP on the plate; if they are qualified only for a RNP of
0.30, they will use those minimums instead. Notice that the minimums are
lower for more stringent RNPs.

If you have a SAAAR RNP authorization, you already know this. If you don't
already know this, you don't have the authorization, and so it doesn't matter,
since you cannot use this SAAAR approach.

Reference the AIM and AC 90-101 (from which the AIM text is largely lifted)
for further information, or just google for it.

Your answers I could glean from the chart. But, what are the aircraft
and crew requirements for:

1. RNP 0.30

2. RNP 0.10

wrote:

On Dec 6, 4:57 pm, "Viperdoc" wrote:


Of course, he has never used an autopilot of any kind, and he has never
flown anything other than a game with a joystick.


Vipe, Vipe Vipe.... Somebody been brainwashing you? :-))))

How does one ***fly*** (or flown) a desktop MSFS simulator?


In any case, it is a computer game. It is not a flight simulator by the
wildest stretch of the imagination (well, except for Anthony's wild
imagination.)

Sam Spade writes:

Your answers I could glean from the chart. But, what are the aircraft
and crew requirements for:

1. RNP 0.30

2. RNP 0.10

I know that below 0.3 dual autopilots driven directly by the RNAV equipment
are required, for the aircraft.

There are indeed a few differences in training requirements between RNP 0.3
and RNP 0.1, but I haven't bothered to study them because I don't need to
care. However, you can look them up if you need to--the sources I gave are a
start. I don't imagine too many Cessnas are flying RNP 0.1 approaches.

2. RNP 0.10

I know that below 0.3 dual autopilots driven directly by the RNAV
equipment
are required, for the aircraft.

Anthony, are there many autopilots that don't couple to the nav equipment?
Can you name some?

There are indeed a few differences in training requirements between RNP
0.3
and RNP 0.1, but I haven't bothered to study them because I don't need to
care. However, you can look them up if you need to--the sources I gave are
a
start. I don't imagine too many Cessnas are flying RNP 0.1 approaches.

Who mentioned anything about Cessnas? How many Cessnas have dual AP? What
type and brand?

Of course you don't know- you look up something in a book in isolation, and
seem to think that it imparts wisdom and experience, which of course you
have neither.

Viperdoc writes:

Who mentioned anything about Cessnas?

Most of the pilots here have never flown airliners, or even any aircraft
equipped for the type of navigation under discussion. Note that the original
topic was VORs.

How many Cessnas have dual AP? What type and brand?

None, as far as I know. Even if someone is making it for Cessnas, it would
cost more than the airframe. (I'm talking about aircraft like 182s or 152s,
not jets.)