![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The other night, when we were working the pattern as an excuse to watch the
sunset from 1000 AGL, it dawned on me that I hadn't practiced any emergency procedures since my last biennial. I like to do these things once in a while, in an effort to remain sharp, and now seemed like a good time. With the kids in the back, and Mary to my right, I asked if anyone wanted to see a practice "engine-out" emergency landing -- to which my bored kids shouted "Sure!" So, I reached over and chopped the throttle, and announced my intentions on Unicom. The winds were calm and the pattern was empty, so we immediately started downhill, and I made the required immediate turn toward the airport... I was on mid-field downwind for Rwy 07, but it soon became apparent that our Cherokee 235 was living up to it's reputation for being a "gliding anvil" -- we weren't *ever* going to make it all the way around. With Runway 12 falling beneath me, I announced our intention of switching runways, and started an immediate turn onto final for Rwy 12... Now high, I had to put a smidge of a slip, and drop that third notch of flaps -- but not too soon! Had to make sure I had the runway made, and then dumped that third notch.... With the runway coming up at remarkable speed, I flared and put her down just past the numbers -- arriving like the proverbial load of sand. It was a perfect "3-point landing" -- except you don't *ever* want to land that nose-heavy 6-cylinder on the nosewheel! The kids exclaimed "that was worse than Mom's landing!" (which earned them both "the Mom Look", instantly sun-burning the sides of both of their faces), and I was glad that Mr. Piper had built some fudge-factor into that landing gear... Gotta remember to pull harder next time, for sure... Of course, it turned out that a group of the usual airport bums were watching, and had to drop by the hangar to congratulate me on my landing prowess. (They would hear NOTHING of my lame "power off landing" excuses, naturally... :-) Great fun, good practice, and it sure reinforced the reason we land our Pathfinder with a smidge of power at touchdown... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just did a bunch of these with my recent BFR on the Arrow - like a
brick. The only positive thing you can say about these glide characteristics is that it makes it easy to avoid wake turbulence by staying well above a normal glidepath. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just did a bunch of these with my recent BFR on the Arrow - like a
brick. The only positive thing you can say about these glide characteristics is that it makes it easy to avoid wake turbulence by staying well above a normal glidepath. The really amazing thing is that many other planes have *worse* glide characteristics than our Cherokees. I've got a friend with a Swearingen SX-300, which is basically a rocket, with stubby little wings. He says when you chop the throttle you are landing NOW, coming down at something like 3000 fpm. Another friend just finished building his Glasair III, and he says his isn't much better. That's the price you pay for all that speed, I guess. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:xJTye.138628$xm3.92446@attbi_s21... I just did a bunch of these with my recent BFR on the Arrow - like a brick. The only positive thing you can say about these glide characteristics is that it makes it easy to avoid wake turbulence by staying well above a normal glidepath. The really amazing thing is that many other planes have *worse* glide characteristics than our Cherokees. I've got a friend with a Swearingen SX-300, which is basically a rocket, with stubby little wings. He says when you chop the throttle you are landing NOW, coming down at something like 3000 fpm. Another friend just finished building his Glasair III, and he says his isn't much better. That's the price you pay for all that speed, I guess. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" Actually thats backward. Faster planes generally have much better glide ratios than slower ones. A 747 has a much better glide ration than your Cherokee and it also has 10X the wingloading. Glide ratio is a drag problem. You start with a certain amount of potential energy and it is consumed by drag. Mike MU-2 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Piper builds the big indians nose heavy and skimps on elevator
authority.... Fat Albert is the same way... Flying solo with full fuel, a forward limit CG condition in an Apache, either power or speed is needed to flare it at all... But load the back seats and/or the baggage compartment enough so the CG is somewhere to the South and he is a different critter... Then the nose comes up enthusiastically and a light touch is needed; compared to the usual 'grab yoke with both hands, hollar yeehaaawww, and pull'... That fat piper wing will lift like a homesick angel, but you gotta be able to get the nose up... Try an experiment today... Use the POH to determine how load the CG to near the rear limit and go fly (solo)... Bring it over the numbers with the usual smidgen of power until the wheels are ~6 inches up, then cut the power and simply refuse to let it sink - just keep raising the nose as your butt tells you it's sinking... You will be amused at how high the nose is pointed into the sky before the wing finally gives up flying... denny |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Next time, for a more challenging approach, try the engine out spiral to
land from several thousand feet over the field, attempting to set yourself up at one of the key positions at the proper altitude for a "near as possible" normal final approach to landing. Also knowing exactly the proper amount of nose up trim to dial in to achieve your best glide speed should help you with your flare to landing. That best L/D speed should leave you with ample control authority to flair. Another maneuver that is fun is the commercial maneuver of a 180 degree power off landing initiated abeam the numbers and landing not short, but within 200 feet of your landing spot. With practice these can become extremely fun and accurate. Speed control and position "tweaking" are the keys. One trick to use, if needed, when you find yourself just a little short but still in a safe position, is to pull the prop into high pitch, low rpm. This will decrease your drag and extend your glide just a tad. Of course remember to cool your engine before chopping the power to prevent or minimize shock cooling. Have fun!! Jim |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay, friends don't let friends get in widow makers like the two you
mentioned... denny |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Glide ratio is a drag
problem. You start with a certain amount of potential energy and it is consumed by drag. No, it's a lift problem (also). A rocket has very little drag, and the glide ratio of a brick. Jose -- You may not get what you pay for, but you sure as hell pay for what you get. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Of course remember to cool your engine before chopping the power to
prevent or minimize shock cooling. Hey -- let's start a new endless thread! Can you shock-cool an engine in summer? :-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a glide lift=weight and the production of that lift causes some amount
of induced drag. Again faster airplanes are going to have less total drag, both induced and parasitic than slower airplanes. I don't have numbers handy but a Bonanza or Mooney (or Baron) is going to glide better than an Arrow. Mike MU-2 "Jose" wrote in message . .. Glide ratio is a drag problem. You start with a certain amount of potential energy and it is consumed by drag. No, it's a lift problem (also). A rocket has very little drag, and the glide ratio of a brick. Jose -- You may not get what you pay for, but you sure as hell pay for what you get. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Precision Landings and practice | [email protected] | Piloting | 34 | December 17th 04 02:08 PM |
V-8 powered Seabee | Corky Scott | Home Built | 212 | October 2nd 04 11:45 PM |
more radial fans like fw190? | jt | Military Aviation | 51 | August 28th 04 04:22 AM |
Tailwheel endorsement | John Harper | Piloting | 58 | December 12th 03 01:48 PM |
Real stats on engine failures? | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 127 | December 8th 03 04:09 PM |