A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Minden-Tahoe Airport Master Plan



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 6th 07, 07:13 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 71
Default Minden-Tahoe Airport Master Plan

From Today's Record Courier
Note the sailplane references

Scare tactics being used to stop planning

by Bill Schroeder
December 5, 2007

I would like to make some comments regarding the debate concerning the
development of the master plan for the Minden-Tahoe Airport. It has
come to the point where it appears that a particular group of
individuals is attempting to convince the public that somehow the
airport is going to become another air carrier airport, even though
the Reno-Tahoe Airport is so far from its potential capacity that it
is continuously reaching out for additional air carrier flights.

The Carson Valley's population and even its projected population will
never be a draw for major or regional air carriers looking to fill
every seat on their aircraft. Reno-Tahoe International Airport is only
30 miles away and with the completion of the freeway, it will take
approximately 30 to 40 minutes to get there from anywhere in Douglas
County.

These individuals, who are attempting to convince you that we will
have a Minden-Tahoe International Airport if this master plan is
adopted, have told you and the press that you can expect to see
355,000 operations a year at our airport. Let me put that in
perspective. John F. Kennedy Airport in New York had 363,000
operations last year. San Francisco International Airport had 354,000
operations last year. The Reno-Tahoe International Airport had
approximately 145,200 operations last year.

Please keep in mind that JFK and SF International are each located
within a population area of close to 10 million people.

It is puzzling to me how these individuals can claim that those
numbers will come about at the Minden-Tahoe Airport with the planned
addition of two sod runways for sailplane use only. I cannot
understand the logic behind their claim or how anyone could possibly
believe their claim. Every Fortune 500 company in the country would
have to set up in the Carson Valley and bring every private aircraft
they own into the county to meet those operations figures. In
addition, the available land in Douglas County could not hold the
population necessary to support that number of aircraft operations at
the airport. Two sod runways for sailplanes? Scare tactics are being
used on you to stop the progress of the master planning process.

The master plan consultants and the master plan working group are
currently in the process of developing a plan for the airport that
will "guide" the airport for the next 20 years. In doing so, the
consultants, experts in the field of developing airport master plans,
have presented ideas and future plans to the working group, the public
and county management.

Recently I have heard, from this group of individuals, that airport
management is developing the east side of the airport against the
wishes of the public and the soaring community. Nothing could be
further from the truth. The development of the east side is a
cornerstone of the 1993 Airport Master Plan that was approved by the
County Commissioners in October of that year and is still in effect
until a new master plan is adopted.

Let me quote from the 1993 Master Plan, a plan that was developed by
many who were in the soaring community at that time.

"Development of sailplane facilities on the east side of the Airport
is essential if Douglas County Airport is to accommodate growth of
both sailplane and other aircraft operations. Following a review of
runway and building area options, the central section of the closed
Runway (Runway 21) and Runway 12-30-has been designated as the site
for sailplane facilities. It is intended that the area would supply
all of the needs of soaring, including: fixed base operators, storage
hangers, and event facilities. The available building area is
approximately three times the existing building area on the west
side."

The master plan that is currently being developed is doing nothing
more than continuing to show the need that was identified in 1993. And
that need was based upon safety - a separation of powered aircraft
from non-powered aircraft and their associated needs.

The 1993 Master Plan also stated that, "If aircraft operations
increase as forecast, another runway will be needed to accommodate
sailplane launches during calm wind conditions. Runway 16L-34R is
located to permit simultaneous operations on it and the main runway
during VFR conditions. Runway 16L-34R would be used exclusively for
sailplane launches."

The master plan currently being developed shows a need for an
additional runway for soaring. This is not a new idea meant to attract
more operations, but an observation of a need made some fifteen years
ago by soaring enthusiasts involved in the master planning process who
believed that the additional runway was needed to benefit soaring.
And, after all, isn't that what we want to do?

Throughout the 1993 Master Plan, the emphasis is on developing a "high
quality sailplane facility on the east side of the airport." Again,
the management of the airport is following the guidelines set forth in
the Master Plan.

The population of Douglas County at the time the 1993 Master Plan was
adopted was 32,130. In 2005 the population had grown to 50,108. With
the growth of the county, comes growth in other sectors such as the
retail sector, service sector, public sector and the airport. It is
not unreasonable to believe that some of the individuals who have
moved into Douglas County are pilots and pilots who own their own
aircraft and base those aircraft at the Minden-Tahoe Airport.

The current master plan takes growth into account. And the growth
projected by the master plan consultants is really very minimal. For
instance, in 1991, the figures used for the 1993 Master Plan, the
airport had an estimated total number of 76,000 operations.

Currently the Minden-Tahoe Airport has an estimated 79,800 operations
per year.

That is a growth of 3,800 operations in 16 years. The number of
operations projected through the twenty year master plan (2027) being
developed is approximately 89,000. This figure has been looked at by
the FAA and has been approved as a viable figure for the Minden-Tahoe
Airport. As the population of the county increases so will the demand
for services. Airport volume will increase to meet the needs of the
citizens.

Keep in mind that this is a 20-year plan - a plan that will come about
if funds are available to carry it out. Not every item in the plan
will come to be as priorities will surely change during the next
twenty years. And the elements of the plan will definitely not take
place all at once as some individuals would like us to believe.

The Minden-Tahoe Airport is a viable part of the community. The
University of Nevada Bureau of Business and Economic Research stated
that, "For the airport to continue growing and supporting the Minden-
Tahoe area businesses, as well as soaring enthusiasts, the economic
impacts of all activities should be taken into account when making any
future development decisions." The report concludes that the airport
contributes $46,711,462.00 to the local economy.

The Minden-Tahoe Airport is a very viable entity. I want to keep it as
a community airport, but I also want it to continue to contribute to
the local economy.

Do not listen to those who wish to scare you into believing that the
airport is somehow going to become a Reno-Tahoe International Airport
clone, or a Centennial, Colorado Airport, as some of those individuals
has previously stated in public meetings. The present population and
the future projected populations do not even come close to supporting
that claim.

These individuals claim to represent you and are telling you and the
county commissioners that they support the will of the people when it
comes to the 1984 Runway Weight Ordinance. However, they then turn
around and tell you not to support the will of the people regarding
the county approved 1993 Airport Master Plan. They want to have it
both ways.



n Bill Schroeder is chairman of the Minden-Tahoe Airport Advisory
Committee and a member of the Master Plan Work Group.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Minden Airport Access P. Corbett Soaring 7 November 8th 07 02:54 AM
fires at Tahoe Matt Herron Jr. Soaring 5 June 28th 07 08:00 AM
Planning a Minden Vacation?-Rating? Soar Minden Block Time FS SAVE SOME MONEY! [email protected] Soaring 1 January 27th 06 07:16 PM
Anti-Noise Nuts Take Over Truckee-Tahoe Airport Larry Dighera Piloting 13 November 18th 05 09:37 AM
Lake Tahoe Ross Richardson Owning 5 March 28th 05 07:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.