A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Seems like an awful lot of prangs



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old December 6th 03, 07:37 AM
Peter Twydell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , MBenShar
writes
I agree that a few of the "successful ejections" did end in tragedy with the
pilot or crew member impacting objects. I presume they mean that the seat
worked as advertised to get the pilot out but once out other circumstances came
into play. There was the sad case when a two seat Jaguar sliced through a civil
aircraft that was flying in a restricted area. The wing came away. Both crew
ejected "successfully" - one survived - the other came out of the aircraft as
the wingless aircraft rolled and he ejected at about 200ft straight downwards
and didn't survive.

ISTR that happened at least once with a Harrier. Yawing and rolling
while hovering in a crosswind, or something like that?

Mike Bennett
Project: Get Out and Walk


--
Peter

Ying tong iddle-i po!
  #12  
Old December 6th 03, 11:50 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Many
ejectees have never bothered to claim their "Ties and Pins" from the company so
don't appear in the official figures.


There's a story from the Falklands war about the Argentine pilot shot
down and captured by the British. His first question was where should
he apply for his tie.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email:

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
  #13  
Old December 6th 03, 06:18 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Chad Irby wrote:

"Leadfoot" wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote:
Well, you do, but it would probably be easier to call it an ejection
aircraft at that point...


Actually there are parachute systems that will attach to a small aircraft
like a 172 and float it gently to earth. Not sure what the weight penalty
is.


Well, yeah, but that's not as much fun...

(Image of a small plane firing downwards, while the pilot keeps going in
a straight line)


Almost certainly from Acme Industries.


....and I'll bet that the guy who sold it had a wolfish grin?...
--

-Gord.
  #14  
Old December 7th 03, 12:23 AM
old hoodoo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"BackToNormal" wrote in message
p.nnz...
A page at http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ejector_seat says

"by mid 2003, Martin Baker ejector seats had saved 7000 lives".

Is that figure maybe a little high?

ronh

--
"People do not make decisions on facts, rather,
how they feel about the facts" Robert Consedine



  #15  
Old December 7th 03, 12:21 PM
Freddy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob McKellar" wrote in message
...


ANDREW ROBERT BREEN wrote:

In article z,
BackToNormal wrote:
A page at http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ejector_seat says

"by mid 2003, Martin Baker ejector seats had saved 7000 lives".

Is that figure maybe a little high?


A bit low, according to Martin-Baker's own site:

7023 lives saved to date, 51 this year.

http://www.martin-baker.com/

Delving a bit deeper, the rate of increase was:

1946: First live ejection
1965: 1000 lives saved by M-B seats
1969: 2000 lives saved "
1971: 3000 lives saved "
1976: 4000 lives saved "
1983: 5000 lives saved "
1990: 6000 lives saved "
2003: 7000 lives saved "

figures taken from:
http://www.martin-baker.com/milestones.htm

so it's heavily weighted towards the period 1965-1971, by
which time most fast jets had bang-seats, there was still
a lot of low-level stuff going on with earlier and probably
slightly tricky jets, and the US - using jets equipped
with MB seats - were fighting a war against an opposition
who were capable of shooting back with some degree of
effect - this would all tend to push seat usage up.

Interesting that the highest altitude an MB seat's been
used from (57000') was as long ago as 1958 - and was
somewhat naturally from a Canberra. Wonder if that was
one of the Olympus-engined specials?


Just a question, dealing from my usual ignorance: If you are that
high, wouldn't it ( usually ) be better to wait a while until the
outside air became warmer and more breathable? Several things come
to mind, such as fire or violent gyrations, that might speed up the
decision process, but I'm curious what other more knowledgeable
folks think about the concept..


If, for whatever reason, the crew need to leave the ac at high altitude then
the crew need to be protected as much as possible from the effects of the
low oxygen/cold environment. The seat supplies supplemental oxygen, but
because the pilot needs to get down to thicker/warmer air as rapidly as
possible, the main chute doesn't open right away. Instead, a smaller chute
called a drogue deploys to stabilize the seat so it doesn't tumble and to
slow the pilot's horizontal velocity. In a near free-fall, he plummets
(still in his seat) until he hits an altitude of, typically, 15-10k feet at
which point he separates from his seat and his main parachute automatically
deploys. If I recall correctly, the time taken to freefall from 55k to 15k
is about 2 mins.




  #16  
Old December 8th 03, 08:15 PM
Alan Minyard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


If, for whatever reason, the crew need to leave the ac at high altitude then
the crew need to be protected as much as possible from the effects of the
low oxygen/cold environment. The seat supplies supplemental oxygen, but
because the pilot needs to get down to thicker/warmer air as rapidly as
possible, the main chute doesn't open right away. Instead, a smaller chute
called a drogue deploys to stabilize the seat so it doesn't tumble and to
slow the pilot's horizontal velocity. In a near free-fall, he plummets
(still in his seat) until he hits an altitude of, typically, 15-10k feet at
which point he separates from his seat and his main parachute automatically
deploys. If I recall correctly, the time taken to freefall from 55k to 15k
is about 2 mins.



Just hope that you are not flying over an 11,000 ft mountain :-)

Al Minyard
  #17  
Old December 12th 03, 01:25 PM
Freddy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If operating over very high terrain (Afghanistan?) then the baro-time
release unit can be adjusted to give a higher seat separation altitude.

This baro-time release unit is responsible for doing a check of seat
altitude post ejection and, if above the set altitude, it will delay
pilot-seat separation until the set altitude is reached. If ejection occurs
below the set altitude then pilot-seat separation occurs almost instantly.
The pilot still retains the facility to initiate seat separation early by
use of a lever on the seat (MB seats).


"Alan Minyard" wrote in message
...

If, for whatever reason, the crew need to leave the ac at high altitude

then
the crew need to be protected as much as possible from the effects of the
low oxygen/cold environment. The seat supplies supplemental oxygen, but
because the pilot needs to get down to thicker/warmer air as rapidly as
possible, the main chute doesn't open right away. Instead, a smaller

chute
called a drogue deploys to stabilize the seat so it doesn't tumble and to
slow the pilot's horizontal velocity. In a near free-fall, he plummets
(still in his seat) until he hits an altitude of, typically, 15-10k feet

at
which point he separates from his seat and his main parachute

automatically
deploys. If I recall correctly, the time taken to freefall from 55k to

15k
is about 2 mins.



Just hope that you are not flying over an 11,000 ft mountain :-)

Al Minyard



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.