If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
In article , MBenShar
writes I agree that a few of the "successful ejections" did end in tragedy with the pilot or crew member impacting objects. I presume they mean that the seat worked as advertised to get the pilot out but once out other circumstances came into play. There was the sad case when a two seat Jaguar sliced through a civil aircraft that was flying in a restricted area. The wing came away. Both crew ejected "successfully" - one survived - the other came out of the aircraft as the wingless aircraft rolled and he ejected at about 200ft straight downwards and didn't survive. ISTR that happened at least once with a Harrier. Yawing and rolling while hovering in a crosswind, or something like that? Mike Bennett Project: Get Out and Walk -- Peter Ying tong iddle-i po! |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Many ejectees have never bothered to claim their "Ties and Pins" from the company so don't appear in the official figures. There's a story from the Falklands war about the Argentine pilot shot down and captured by the British. His first question was where should he apply for his tie. all the best -- Dan Ford email: see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Chad Irby wrote:
"Leadfoot" wrote: "Chad Irby" wrote: Well, you do, but it would probably be easier to call it an ejection aircraft at that point... Actually there are parachute systems that will attach to a small aircraft like a 172 and float it gently to earth. Not sure what the weight penalty is. Well, yeah, but that's not as much fun... (Image of a small plane firing downwards, while the pilot keeps going in a straight line) Almost certainly from Acme Industries. ....and I'll bet that the guy who sold it had a wolfish grin?... -- -Gord. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"BackToNormal" wrote in message p.nnz... A page at http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ejector_seat says "by mid 2003, Martin Baker ejector seats had saved 7000 lives". Is that figure maybe a little high? ronh -- "People do not make decisions on facts, rather, how they feel about the facts" Robert Consedine |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Bob McKellar" wrote in message ... ANDREW ROBERT BREEN wrote: In article z, BackToNormal wrote: A page at http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ejector_seat says "by mid 2003, Martin Baker ejector seats had saved 7000 lives". Is that figure maybe a little high? A bit low, according to Martin-Baker's own site: 7023 lives saved to date, 51 this year. http://www.martin-baker.com/ Delving a bit deeper, the rate of increase was: 1946: First live ejection 1965: 1000 lives saved by M-B seats 1969: 2000 lives saved " 1971: 3000 lives saved " 1976: 4000 lives saved " 1983: 5000 lives saved " 1990: 6000 lives saved " 2003: 7000 lives saved " figures taken from: http://www.martin-baker.com/milestones.htm so it's heavily weighted towards the period 1965-1971, by which time most fast jets had bang-seats, there was still a lot of low-level stuff going on with earlier and probably slightly tricky jets, and the US - using jets equipped with MB seats - were fighting a war against an opposition who were capable of shooting back with some degree of effect - this would all tend to push seat usage up. Interesting that the highest altitude an MB seat's been used from (57000') was as long ago as 1958 - and was somewhat naturally from a Canberra. Wonder if that was one of the Olympus-engined specials? Just a question, dealing from my usual ignorance: If you are that high, wouldn't it ( usually ) be better to wait a while until the outside air became warmer and more breathable? Several things come to mind, such as fire or violent gyrations, that might speed up the decision process, but I'm curious what other more knowledgeable folks think about the concept.. If, for whatever reason, the crew need to leave the ac at high altitude then the crew need to be protected as much as possible from the effects of the low oxygen/cold environment. The seat supplies supplemental oxygen, but because the pilot needs to get down to thicker/warmer air as rapidly as possible, the main chute doesn't open right away. Instead, a smaller chute called a drogue deploys to stabilize the seat so it doesn't tumble and to slow the pilot's horizontal velocity. In a near free-fall, he plummets (still in his seat) until he hits an altitude of, typically, 15-10k feet at which point he separates from his seat and his main parachute automatically deploys. If I recall correctly, the time taken to freefall from 55k to 15k is about 2 mins. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
If, for whatever reason, the crew need to leave the ac at high altitude then the crew need to be protected as much as possible from the effects of the low oxygen/cold environment. The seat supplies supplemental oxygen, but because the pilot needs to get down to thicker/warmer air as rapidly as possible, the main chute doesn't open right away. Instead, a smaller chute called a drogue deploys to stabilize the seat so it doesn't tumble and to slow the pilot's horizontal velocity. In a near free-fall, he plummets (still in his seat) until he hits an altitude of, typically, 15-10k feet at which point he separates from his seat and his main parachute automatically deploys. If I recall correctly, the time taken to freefall from 55k to 15k is about 2 mins. Just hope that you are not flying over an 11,000 ft mountain :-) Al Minyard |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
If operating over very high terrain (Afghanistan?) then the baro-time
release unit can be adjusted to give a higher seat separation altitude. This baro-time release unit is responsible for doing a check of seat altitude post ejection and, if above the set altitude, it will delay pilot-seat separation until the set altitude is reached. If ejection occurs below the set altitude then pilot-seat separation occurs almost instantly. The pilot still retains the facility to initiate seat separation early by use of a lever on the seat (MB seats). "Alan Minyard" wrote in message ... If, for whatever reason, the crew need to leave the ac at high altitude then the crew need to be protected as much as possible from the effects of the low oxygen/cold environment. The seat supplies supplemental oxygen, but because the pilot needs to get down to thicker/warmer air as rapidly as possible, the main chute doesn't open right away. Instead, a smaller chute called a drogue deploys to stabilize the seat so it doesn't tumble and to slow the pilot's horizontal velocity. In a near free-fall, he plummets (still in his seat) until he hits an altitude of, typically, 15-10k feet at which point he separates from his seat and his main parachute automatically deploys. If I recall correctly, the time taken to freefall from 55k to 15k is about 2 mins. Just hope that you are not flying over an 11,000 ft mountain :-) Al Minyard |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|