A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Questions on VFR sectionals and TACs



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 19th 06, 01:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Christopher Brian Colohan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 71
Default Questions on VFR sectionals and TACs

Ron Natalie writes:
Symbols are explained more in the Aeronautical Chart User's Guide.
http://www.naco.faa.gov/index.asp?xm...ine/aero_guide

The blue line with the dots indicates a conservation area (wilelife
refuge, national park ,etc.).

Pilots are requested to stay 2000' above these (but it's not
mandatory).


North of Boston you will find a large white-ground circle outlined by
a thick cyan dashed line.

The meaning of white ground or a thick cyan dashed line is not defined
in the chart legend, nor is it defined in the book you point at. Any
guess what this is? (And why the FAA thinks it is worth putting on
the chart, but not worth documenting what it means?)

Chris
  #2  
Old November 19th 06, 01:34 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,374
Default Questions on VFR sectionals and TACs

In article ,
Christopher Brian Colohan wrote:

North of Boston you will find a large white-ground circle outlined by
a thick cyan dashed line.


Not anymore (look at the 74th edition of the NY sectional)


The meaning of white ground or a thick cyan dashed line is not defined
in the chart legend, nor is it defined in the book you point at. Any
guess what this is? (And why the FAA thinks it is worth putting on
the chart, but not worth documenting what it means?)


On the 73rd edition of the NY sectional there is indeed a note
that P-67 is expanded by special notam.

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

  #3  
Old November 19th 06, 05:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Christopher Brian Colohan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 71
Default Questions on VFR sectionals and TACs

Bob Noel writes:

In article ,
Christopher Brian Colohan wrote:

North of Boston you will find a large white-ground circle outlined by
a thick cyan dashed line.


Not anymore (look at the 74th edition of the NY sectional)


Heh. Don't have that one yet. :-)

The meaning of white ground or a thick cyan dashed line is not defined
in the chart legend, nor is it defined in the book you point at. Any
guess what this is? (And why the FAA thinks it is worth putting on
the chart, but not worth documenting what it means?)


On the 73rd edition of the NY sectional there is indeed a note
that P-67 is expanded by special notam.


I found the note, but only figured out what it was associated with
_after_ someone explained the dashed circle to me. I guess I find it
puzzling that there are symbols used on the map which don't appear in
any legend... (Especially when just adding them to the legend with a
description like "heavy cyan dashed line == TFR outline" would clear
everything up.)

Chris
  #4  
Old November 19th 06, 12:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,374
Default Questions on VFR sectionals and TACs

In article ,
Christopher Brian Colohan wrote:

North of Boston you will find a large white-ground circle outlined by
a thick cyan dashed line.


Not anymore (look at the 74th edition of the NY sectional)


Heh. Don't have that one yet. :-)


I literally got it from the club a few hours earlier as he unpacked
the boxes. :-)

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

  #5  
Old November 19th 06, 02:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Questions on VFR sectionals and TACs

Christopher Brian Colohan writes:

North of Boston you will find a large white-ground circle outlined by
a thick cyan dashed line.


Looks like the one around Washington. I think it means that one of
the President's friends lives somewhere near there, so all aircraft
for dozens of miles around are prohibited so as not to disturb the
royals.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #6  
Old November 19th 06, 12:38 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default Questions on VFR sectionals and TACs

Christopher Brian Colohan wrote:


The meaning of white ground or a thick cyan dashed line is not defined
in the chart legend, nor is it defined in the book you point at. Any
guess what this is? (And why the FAA thinks it is worth putting on
the chart, but not worth documenting what it means?)

Correct. NACO finally adopted that to mean special flight restricted
airspace. The other big use fo it is the FRZ in Washington and P-40
(Camp David) in DC.

Are we talking about the one over Bush the First's place in
Kennebunkport?
  #7  
Old November 19th 06, 01:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Questions on VFR sectionals and TACs

Ron Natalie writes:

Are we talking about the one over Bush the First's place in
Kennebunkport?


Why does he get a flight restriction? He's not a public official (as
far as I know).

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #8  
Old November 19th 06, 03:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Peter Clark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 538
Default Questions on VFR sectionals and TACs

On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:00:20 +0100, Mxsmanic
wrote:

Ron Natalie writes:

Are we talking about the one over Bush the First's place in
Kennebunkport?


Why does he get a flight restriction? He's not a public official (as
far as I know).


He doesn't. He gets a 1000'/1NM prohibited area. It's when the other
one comes to visit that the standard TFR appears, which (at least in
the ones I have) is charted by the absence of ground color. I see
someone else mentioned that the new chart which takes effect Thursday
doesn't have this feature any more. Course, the TFR can still appear.
  #9  
Old November 19th 06, 02:28 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Steven P. McNicoll[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 660
Default Questions on VFR sectionals and TACs


"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
m...

The nominal diameter is 4.3 NM (5 SM). There
may be extensions either as class D or class E surface area that
accomodate the instrumetn approaches. They're centered on the
airport reference point.


There is no nominal diameter for Class D or E surface areas. The standard
is 3.5 NM plus the distance from the Airport Reference Point to the end of
the outermost runway.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.