If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Ice blonde" wrote:
No arguement from me. It just seems that a fuel gauge is not as important as the attitude indicator yet the attitude indicator is not required. Though fuel is a major part of keeping you in the air as opposed to in the ground. Interesting, but I suppose logically the fuel itself is more important than the gauge, just as the pilot is more important than altitude indicator? I mean, if you know how much fuel you have, and how long it will keep you in the air, could you gauge it by time? Also if flying in good visiblity could you fly without an altitude indicator? Thanks Fuel is no doubt more important than the fuel gauge. Altitude indicator is a required instrument for VFR Day but the Attitude indicator is not. -- Mike Flyin'8 PP-ASEL Temecula, CA http://flying.4alexanders.com |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Fuel is no doubt more important than the fuel gauge. Altitude indicator is
a required instrument for VFR Day but the Attitude indicator is not. LOL and there was me thinking you just can't spell :-) OK, do enlighten me about the ATTITUDE indicator?? Regards |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Ice blonde" wrote in message
ups.com... I mean, if you know how much fuel you have, and how long it will keep you in the air, could you gauge it by time? Not if there's a leak you don't know about. --Gary |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"rps" wrote in message oups.com... As far as I can tell, the regs say that a fuel gage is required and operable. It doesn't say that it has to be accurate. My entire primary training (some years ago) was done in ancient 150's, 152's, and 172's whose fuel gages were notoriously unreliable. Unless the regs (or their interpretation) have changed since then, it's probably okay to fly with an inaccurate gage. You may want to check with the FBO/mechanic/owner to find out what they really mean by "inop." If it's not reading the correct value, you're probably ok. If something is broken, then the plane's probably unairworthy. Could you not empty the fuel tank, and then, the fuel gauge pointing to empty is correct? Just a thought. -- Jim in NC |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Ice blonde wrote:
OK, do enlighten me about the ATTITUDE indicator?? it used to be called 'artificial horizon'... as for fuel gages: I have always been told never to trust the thing; if you know how much fuel you have when you depart (which you should), and do simple arithmetics (say, it will burn so much an hour during the climb, so much during cruise and descent -- numbers which you get from the performance data of the aircraft documentation which you should of course study) -- and keep good track of your progress during the flight -- you can guestimate how much fuel you'll have when you arrive quite accurately (and with a bit of experience with one specific aircraft you'll get more accurate). It's a fun little game to play when flying cross country, see how close one can predict fuel usage (which can be verified when refueling at the end) -- i.e., with of course a comfortable reserve (I don't like surprises); --Sylvain |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message
... It just seems that a fuel gauge is not as important as the attitude indicator yet the attitude indicator is not required. Why is an attitude indicator important if you can look out the window? In instrument conditions, a working attitude indicator is indeed required. (It's true, though, that there are some nominally VFR conditions--such as flying at night over water--that can require flying by instruments; and there is arguably a gap in the FARs with regard to requiring an attitude indicator in those conditions.) --Gary |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Gary Drescher wrote:
Not if there's a leak you don't know about. fair enough. I wouldn't trust the gage for fuel management, but if the things show zero or low when it shouldn't, it is a good idea to land and investigate... --Sylvain |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
It just seems that a fuel gauge is not as important
as the attitude indicator yet the attitude indicator is not required. The attitude indicator is not at all important for day VFR flying, which is what the context of the OP was. In IFR conditions, the fuel gauge is very important. Jose -- Money: what you need when you run out of brains. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"Sylvain" wrote in message
... Gary Drescher wrote: Not if there's a leak you don't know about. fair enough. I wouldn't trust the gage for fuel management, but if the things show zero or low when it shouldn't, it is a good idea to land and investigate... Exactly. It's a matter of redundancy. You should always trust the *lower* of your calculated remaining fuel, and what your fuel gauges tell you. --Gary |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
I do believe Mike Flyin'8 was making a play on words....
Fuel is no doubt more important than the fuel gauge. Altitude indicator is a required instrument for VFR Day but the Attitude indicator is not. The attitude indicator is not at all important for day VFR flying, which is what the context of the OP was. In IFR conditions, the fuel gauge is very important. Regards |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Time, running out of fuel and fuel gauges | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 29 | February 3rd 08 07:04 PM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Cherokee Fuel Gauge | Mike Spera | Owning | 6 | July 15th 05 05:30 AM |
Is Your Airplane Susceptible To Mis Fu eling? A Simple Test For Fuel Contamination. | Nathan Young | Piloting | 4 | June 14th 04 06:13 PM |