A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Exxon 20W50



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
Old August 22nd 03, 09:52 PM
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Pat Barry" wrote in message ...
Dear Dave:

My maintenance business was affected by the Aeroshell Oil problem since we

had
bought the 15W50 oil during the problem period. The problem, as I learned

when I
called Shell, as that a transfer pump between a vat and the bottling line

was
shedding metal fragments, but that the fragments were less than ten

microns
which would not harm an engine since they were smaller than fragments that
dislodge during normal engine wear and stay in circulation until the next

oil
change - however they had chosen to make a full breast of the problem, and

they
announced it to the media, which is where I learned about the problem.

I called the aircraft owners who may (only may) have gotten infected oil

and
they asked me to change the oil immediately and to check for damage. Only

one
twin engine aircraft was found to have been filled with oil that was

produced
during the suspect period, and Shell offered to pay the entire cost of oil
change, including filter and any investigative services we chose to do. We
changed the oil and filters, and borescoped the engine and did oil

analyses, and
found normal operation, and returned the plane to service, and we have

monitored
it since and found no problems at all. Everything is normal.

Shell could not have been more cooperative, and when the check arrived for

the
cost of the oil change and the other work I saw it was from their

liability
insurance carrier. In any case, I have to hand it to Shell because they

could
have ignored it, but not wanting a Mobil Oil debacle like they had in

Australia
(which led to having to overhaul some hundreds of engines due to fuel
contamination) they chose to deal with the problem - an admirable action!


Actually Shell did nothing and admitted nothing until after the word got
out. If you knew who to ask they would quietly tell you over the phone what
batches were in question. They then made an announcement and posted to
their WEB site only after it looked like the story was going to blow sky
high. As I remember the reimbursement required a number of hoops to be
jumped through.





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.