If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Hawker vs. Glider Midair - random thoughts
Transponders, or other far better technology like ADS-B deserve careful
consideration but currently the cost, weight, space and battery power required are obstacles to wide acceptance by glider owner/operators. There's a 2.25" hole in my panel for a transponder but there's an even bigger hole in my wallet preventing me from filling the panel hole. (Although the priority is rising.) Technology like Mode S and/or ADS-B will replace Mode C transponders so investing in Mode C now may be an expensive short term solution. The "system" didn't work but the parachute did. "Right of way" is a slippery concept but in this case, the glider was apparently thermalling so it was a semi-stationary object hit by a fast moving jet. It seems logical to me the burden of responsibility falls on the Hawker pilot. This is backed up by FAR's If, as is being speculated, the transponder installed in the glider was not yet properly tested for use and therefore not turned on, I don't think there is any culpability for the glider pilot. In fact, he should get credit for trying to do the right thing. This incident should be a reminder to jet pilots that "clearing the flight path" when flying below FL180 in VMC is an absolute necessity. The "system" simply can't and won't protect you under VMC. I have had heavy transport aircraft fly close by me in situations where, in my opinion, there was no reason for them being there. For example, a jet in American Airlines livery flew under me when I was flying below the rim of the Colorado River gorge in western Colorado. It couldn't have been more than 1000 feet AGL. In another case, I was below the peaks of the Contenintal Divide when a jet in United Airlines livery came through a notch in the ridegline clearing his shadow by only a few hundred feet. Presumably, no passengers were aboard in either case. An actual collision is not the only danger. Wake turbulence left by a heavy will also damage a glider. Be careful out there. Bill Daniels "Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... On 31 Aug 2006 05:53:22 -0700, "Kingfish" wrote in . com: Larry Dighera wrote: While pilot Annette Saunders handled her Hawker 800XP admirably after colliding with the glider, why she obviously failed to give way is a mystery. Don't you have to *see* the other aircraft before you can give way? Unless TCAS or radar vectors are involved, yes. As has been mentioned by other posters in this thread, if the glider didn't have a transponder the jet's TCAS wouldn't have seen it, and the glider's profile might make it hard to spot. Agreed. Why do you automatically assume the Hawker pilot is at fault? Because it is my understanding that federal regulations grant gliders right-of-way over powered aircraft. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hawker vs. Glider Midair - with photo! | Darkwing | Piloting | 151 | September 5th 06 05:19 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Bad publicity | David Starer | Soaring | 18 | March 8th 04 03:57 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |