A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Federal Aviation Administration to cut more air traffic controllers



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 23rd 06, 03:44 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr,alt.aviation.safety,rec.aviation.student
JohnSmith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Federal Aviation Administration to cut more air traffic controllers

cor wrote:

Don't you feel safer already?

----
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 11:18:07 PDT
From: "Peter
Subject: Air Traffic Controllers Chafe at Plan to Cut Staff

A drive by the Federal Aviation Administration to cut the

number of air traffic controllers nationally by 10 percent
below negotiated levels, and even more sharply at places
like the busy radar center here, is producing tension, anger
and occasional shows of defiance among controllers. One of
the new changes may have safety implications: ending of
contractual protection against being kept working on a
controller's radar screen for more than two hours without a
break. Having just one controller on duty is also
problematic [as noted in the recent wrong-runway episode in
Lexington KY (RISKS-24.41)]. [Source: Matthew L. Wald, *The
New York Times*, 20 Sep
2006; PGN-ed, TNX to Lauren Weinstein]



http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/20/wa...20control.html


Don't you get it sir? The FAA is now controlled by Lesbian
Bull-Dikes. The focus now in the FAA is kissing the black
ass, Diversity SCAMS, EEO, Female mentoring programs, etc.

Air Safety is not on the priority list any longer in the
FAA. It's just lip service.

Look at this link.

http://www.nbcfae.org/2006AnnualTraining.htm

This FAA Black only RACIST boondoggle at a RESORT SPA was
funded by YOUR tax money authorized by Feminist and Black
Managers in the FAA

Air Traffic Controllers?
Systems Technicians who maintain the critical Radar and
Communication equipment?

Hell who needs that?

The new edict in the FAA is "Kiss that Black Ass" at all
cost. It IS the new priority in the FAA not Air Safety. The
FAA has become a giant Government TIT sucking racist
organization ONLY focused on feel good social programs and
kissing the black ass and ridiculing and stressing out their
experienced white male employees. (See Lexington 17 year
Veteran WHITE Controller working double shifts with no sleep
and the violation of FAA orders at this location)

Air Safety is not a priority any longer in the new feel good
social engineering on your tax dime FAA.

If people don't call their elected representatives and raise
hell more people are going to die in preventable air
disasters. Lexington is the just the start. Why not cut out
all those Civil Rights empires in the FAA and spend that
money on people who count like Controllers and Technicians?

Until the Flying Public floods the FAA with calls of citizen
complaint the FAA will keep on full speed ahead "Kissing the
Black Ass" and wasting your tax dollars by the millions on
Civil rights empires and boondoggles.

All while the next air tragedy is looming

Here is the FAA HotLine

Call FAA toll-free 24 hours a day at 1-866-TELL-FAA
(1-866-835-5322)

Call and ask this simple question....

"Why is the FAA cutting critical staffing for controllers
and technicians at the same time they are funding a RACIST
organization to travel to a RESORT SPA to scheme ways to run
off white male employees and build your civil rights empires
on my tax dime"??

The families of the dead burned to toast people in Lexington
would like an answer to that question also.
  #2  
Old September 23rd 06, 04:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr,alt.aviation.safety,rec.aviation.student
John Mazor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 34
Default Federal Aviation Administration to cut more air traffic controllers

"JohnSmith" wrote in message
...
cor wrote:
Call and ask this simple question....


The only question here is why you think that nobody notices that in addition
to being a racist kook, you keep posting in the aviation groups using
various sock nyms. This is at least the fourth time you've posted the same
crap here under four different nyms in the past month.

Bwha-wha-wha-wha! What a maroon!


  #3  
Old September 23rd 06, 05:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr,alt.aviation.safety,rec.aviation.student
Ron Lee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 295
Default Federal Aviation Administration to cut more air traffic controllers

Having just one controller on duty is also
problematic [as noted in the recent wrong-runway episode in
Lexington KY (RISKS-24.41)]. [Source: Matthew L. Wald, *The
New York Times*, 20 Sep
2006; PGN-ed, TNX to Lauren Weinstein]



http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/20/wa...20control.html


Non-issue. The pilots were responsible for verifying that they were
on the correct runway.

Ron Lee
  #4  
Old September 23rd 06, 06:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr,alt.aviation.safety,rec.aviation.student
JohnSmith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Federal Aviation Administration to cut more air traffic controllers

Ron Lee wrote:
Having just one controller on duty is also

problematic [as noted in the recent wrong-runway episode in
Lexington KY (RISKS-24.41)]. [Source: Matthew L. Wald, *The
New York Times*, 20 Sep

2006; PGN-ed, TNX to Lauren Weinstein]



http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/20/wa...20control.html



Non-issue. The pilots were responsible for verifying that they were
on the correct runway.

Ron Lee


Incorrect. It is an issue. Fatigued controller working a
double shift without proper rest combined with the FAA
violating their own staffing orders at KLEX.

It is a HUGE issue. The word is Liability. Look it up.

How can you justify cutting controller staffing while you
spend millions on Civil Rights empires in the FAA?

You are on an IFR approach. You are bumping minimums low on
fuel. Would you rather have the FAA spend money on..

1. Air Traffic controllers and ILS technicians or...

2. Kissing the Black Ass boondoggles at a resort spa?

I choose number 1.

The FAA chooses number 2.

It is an issue
  #5  
Old September 23rd 06, 06:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr,alt.aviation.safety,rec.aviation.student
JohnSmith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Federal Aviation Administration to cut more air traffic controllers

John Mazor wrote:
"JohnSmith" wrote in message
...

cor wrote:
Call and ask this simple question....



The only question here is why you think that nobody notices that in addition
to being a racist kook, you keep posting in the aviation groups using
various sock nyms. This is at least the fourth time you've posted the same
crap here under four different nyms in the past month.

Bwha-wha-wha-wha! What a maroon!



Maroon?

If you are going to give me crap(I am guessing you are a
probably either a Bull Dike, Black or Homosexual)then spell
it correctly asswipe

ma‧roon1  /məˈrun/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled
Pronunciation[muh-roon] –adjective
1. dark brownish-red.
2. Chiefly British.
a. a loudly exploding firework consisting of a cardboard
container filled with gunpowder.
b. a similar firework used as a danger or warning signal, as
by railway brakemen.

Racist Kook? So I guess you are saying it's OK for the FAA
to cut controller staffing but fund with the same money
racist boondoggles by Black FAA employees at resort spas?

I hope YOU are not caught in IFR low on fuel with your
alternate down for minimums.

All those worthless Black Civil Servants in the FAA at that
resort spa sucking the Guvment Tit will not help you much.

"Political Correctness is Tyranny with Manners and the
downfall of America as we know it"
  #6  
Old September 23rd 06, 07:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr,alt.aviation.safety,rec.aviation.student
Steven P. McNicoll[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 660
Default Federal Aviation Administration to cut more air traffic controllers


"JohnSmith" wrote in message
. ..

Bwha-wha-wha-wha! What a maroon!


Maroon?

If you are going to give me crap(I am guessing you are a probably either a
Bull Dike, Black or Homosexual)then spell it correctly asswipe

ma?roon1 /m?'run/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled
Pronunciation[muh-roon] -adjective
1. dark brownish-red.
2. Chiefly British.
a. a loudly exploding firework consisting of a cardboard container filled
with gunpowder.
b. a similar firework used as a danger or warning signal, as by railway
brakemen.


You didn't watch enough cartoons.


  #7  
Old September 23rd 06, 08:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr,alt.aviation.safety,rec.aviation.student
Jim Logajan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,958
Default Federal Aviation Administration to cut more air traffic controllers

JohnSmith wrote:
Maroon?


http://www.randomhouse.com/wotd/inde...?date=19970731

Racist Kook?


A more accurate characterization might be "misogynistic and racist troll."

So I guess you are saying it's OK for the FAA
to cut controller staffing but fund with the same money
racist boondoggles by Black FAA employees at resort spas?


The link you provided earlier indicates the organization is a private one,
and nothing you've provided indicates any direct funding from the FAA.
Furthermore, there do not appear to be any racial restrictions on joining
the group. And relative to the composition of the civilian labor force,
which allegedly is composed of ~26% minorities, the FAA workforce is
composed of ~18% minorities[1]. Your trolling is, as usual, misinformed and
trivially debunked.

[1] http://www.nbcfae.org/Documents/Menu...sinessCase.pdf
  #8  
Old September 24th 06, 07:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr,alt.aviation.safety,rec.aviation.student
John Mazor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 34
Default Federal Aviation Administration to cut more air traffic controllers

"JohnSmith" wrote in message
. ..
John Mazor wrote:
"JohnSmith" wrote in message
...

cor wrote:
Call and ask this simple question....


The only question here is why you think that nobody notices that in
addition to being a racist kook, you keep posting in the aviation groups
using various sock nyms. This is at least the fourth time you've posted
the same crap here under four different nyms in the past month.

Bwha-wha-wha-wha! What a maroon!


Maroon?


Whoosh! Google the phrase and see how you're still a maroon.

If you are going to give me crap(I am guessing you are a probably either a
Bull Dike, Black or Homosexual)then spell it correctly asswipe


Your guessing abilities are no better than your ability to put on a sock

ma?roon1 /m?'run/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled
Pronunciation[muh-roon] -adjective
1. dark brownish-red.
2. Chiefly British.
a. a loudly exploding firework consisting of a cardboard container filled
with gunpowder.
b. a similar firework used as a danger or warning signal, as by railway
brakemen.


Bwha-wha-wha!

Racist Kook? So I guess you are saying it's OK for the FAA to cut
controller staffing but fund with the same money racist boondoggles by
Black FAA employees at resort spas?


You still can't guess.

I hope YOU are not caught in IFR low on fuel with your alternate down for
minimums.


I hope you don't think anyone is fooled by this into thinking that you know
squat about aviation.

All those worthless Black Civil Servants in the FAA at that resort spa
sucking the Guvment Tit will not help you much.


You're still a racist kook, too.

"Political Correctness is Tyranny with Manners and the downfall of America
as we know it"


It's maroons like you who gave rise to PC.


  #9  
Old September 24th 06, 02:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr,alt.aviation.safety,rec.aviation.student
Judah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 936
Default Federal Aviation Administration to cut more air traffic controllers

JohnSmith wrote in news:eaeRg.21555$eW5.17847
@bignews5.bellsouth.net:

Incorrect. It is an issue. Fatigued controller working a
double shift without proper rest combined with the FAA
violating their own staffing orders at KLEX.


Irrelevant. Taking off and landing safely is the pilot's responsibility. The
presence or absence of a tower, a controller, or even a runway is irrelevant.

It is a HUGE issue. The word is Liability. Look it up.


In the US, anyone can sue anyone for anything with pretty much no risk. For
example, if it bothers you so much that there are black homosexuals in the
FAA, you are certainly able to sue.

Just please stop ranting about it here.

  #10  
Old September 24th 06, 02:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr,alt.aviation.safety,rec.aviation.student
Steven P. McNicoll[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 660
Default Federal Aviation Administration to cut more air traffic controllers


"JohnSmith" wrote in message
. ..

Incorrect. It is an issue. Fatigued controller working a double shift
without proper rest combined with the FAA violating their own staffing
orders at KLEX.

It is a HUGE issue. The word is Liability. Look it up.


How is the FAA liable? The tower controller did everything required and
without any error. What might have been different had the staffing policy
been followed and a second controller had been on duty in the TRACON?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder John Doe Piloting 145 March 31st 06 06:58 PM
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? Ric Home Built 2 September 13th 05 09:39 PM
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Home Built 3 May 14th 04 11:55 AM
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 May 11th 04 10:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.