A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Nexrad versus on-board radar



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 19th 03, 03:10 PM
Wyatt Emmerich
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nexrad versus on-board radar

Flying back from Atlanta to Jackson, my Echo Flight finally received its
downloaded Nexrad data. It showed me flying right in the middle of a big
blotch of red. I look outside the window. I'm in light 40 F light drizzle
with ceilings of about 6000 above a broken 2000 layer. I turn on the
Bendix/King RDR 2000 on-board radar. It shows nothing. Nothing on the
stormscope.

Why the huge contrast between the on-board and the Nexrad return? Perhaps
the Nexrad was picking up water far above me, while the on-board was looking
ahead (I was at 5,000.)


  #2  
Old December 20th 03, 07:33 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Wyatt Emmerich" wrote in message
...
Flying back from Atlanta to Jackson, my Echo Flight finally received its
downloaded Nexrad data. It showed me flying right in the middle of a big
blotch of red. I look outside the window. I'm in light 40 F light drizzle
with ceilings of about 6000 above a broken 2000 layer. I turn on the
Bendix/King RDR 2000 on-board radar. It shows nothing. Nothing on the
stormscope.

Why the huge contrast between the on-board and the Nexrad return? Perhaps
the Nexrad was picking up water far above me, while the on-board was

looking
ahead (I was at 5,000.)


Isn't Nexrad satellite based? In that case, you would be seeing the moisture
_above_.


  #3  
Old December 20th 03, 01:24 PM
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tom Sixkiller" wrote:
Isn't Nexrad satellite based?


No. It's radar based.

In that case, you would be seeing the moisture
_above_.


NexRad sees precipitation returns.
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM


  #4  
Old December 20th 03, 01:27 PM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...
"Tom Sixkiller" wrote:
Isn't Nexrad satellite based?


No. It's radar based.


Doesn't it have satellite overlays?


In that case, you would be seeing the moisture
_above_.


NexRad sees precipitation returns.


So...why is he getting the returns he is?



  #5  
Old December 20th 03, 01:28 PM
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Wyatt Emmerich" wrote:
Why the huge contrast between the on-board and the Nexrad return?
Perhaps the Nexrad was picking up water far above me, while the
on-board was looking ahead (I was at 5,000.)


Perhaps, but I have seen persistant false weather depictions on my
WxWorks NEXRAD display a couple of times.
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM



  #6  
Old December 20th 03, 06:02 PM
EDR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Tom Sixkiller
wrote:

Isn't Nexrad satellite based? In that case, you would be seeing the moisture
_above_.


NexRad is the current ground based system. What he is referring to is
an uplink of the images.
  #7  
Old December 20th 03, 08:18 PM
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tom Sixkiller" wrote:
No. It's radar based.


Doesn't it have satellite overlays?


What's are those?

In that case, you would be seeing the moisture
_above_.


NexRad sees precipitation returns.


So...why is he getting the returns he is?


He's seeing false returns or artifacts of the process that creates the
NEXRAD composite or some fault in the system he's using to receive
NEXRAD. Also, I suppose it's possible that NEXRAD was showing some very
high altitude virga that his on-board radar was pitched too low to see.
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM


  #8  
Old December 20th 03, 10:28 PM
Mick Ruthven
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I've never used in-aircraft Nexrad. But the Nexrad images displayed on the
web by the National Weather Service has two modes, Precipitation and Clear
Air. When there isn't significant precip they use Clear Air mode that is
much more sensitive and will displays colors without any precip. Don't know
if that applies to the in-aircraft version.

"Wyatt Emmerich" wrote in message
...
Flying back from Atlanta to Jackson, my Echo Flight finally received its
downloaded Nexrad data. It showed me flying right in the middle of a big
blotch of red. I look outside the window. I'm in light 40 F light drizzle
with ceilings of about 6000 above a broken 2000 layer. I turn on the
Bendix/King RDR 2000 on-board radar. It shows nothing. Nothing on the
stormscope.

Why the huge contrast between the on-board and the Nexrad return? Perhaps
the Nexrad was picking up water far above me, while the on-board was

looking
ahead (I was at 5,000.)




  #9  
Old December 21st 03, 02:57 AM
McGregor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Most likely the answer. Check the DBZ scale, if it starts with negative
numbers the radar is in clear air mode. In precip mode it starts at 5 dbz.

"Mick Ruthven" wrote in message
...
I've never used in-aircraft Nexrad. But the Nexrad images displayed on the
web by the National Weather Service has two modes, Precipitation and Clear
Air. When there isn't significant precip they use Clear Air mode that is
much more sensitive and will displays colors without any precip. Don't

know
if that applies to the in-aircraft version.



  #10  
Old December 21st 03, 04:10 AM
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Saryon" wrote:
Perhaps, but I have seen persistant false weather depictions on my
WxWorks NEXRAD display a couple of times.


Is it possible that it's something like doppler where they have a
sensativity setting, and when it's not raining all that hard they
crank up the sensativity which creates returns for moisture that's
really, really fine?


In the case I described, there was no precipitation at all.
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EAA Board Of Directors (Here We Go Again) RST Engineering Home Built 32 January 21st 05 09:46 PM
Uplink weather advice Richard Kaplan Instrument Flight Rules 15 August 31st 03 11:39 PM
Marine Radar in a plane? Jay Honeck Home Built 31 August 13th 03 06:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.