"socialist" when describing Hillary Clinton

Marissa,

By following your position, we could also argue that being anti-religious
is a religion in its own right.


No, one could not.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

"Neil Gould" wrote
Recently, dVaridel posted:
If only all non-Creationists stated it this way. Most try to prove
that they have "The Answer" (tm).

According to whom, Creationists? Scientists make no such claim.

No, thrown at me when I adopt a "Creationist" (for lack of a better term)
position in a discussion. The "Not-Creationists" (admittedly not
"Scientists" either) try to tell me that science can supply answers to the
big questions - like where did we come from etc..

The point I was trying to make a few posts back was that I like the
Scientist as an enquiring mind approach.


I happen to like Warriors, as I'm not in much of a hurry. Our club is
acquiring a couple of Cirrus SR-22s, and I'm not all that interested in
them. We also have a few (Bo)nanzas (to answer another poster's question
about "Bo"), and I have yet to go up in those either.

Yeah, I like my Warrior too ...... thought they seem to have shrunk in the
25 years since I first "graduated" to one (from C150/152's) :-)


Cheers,

David

--
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.

In article ,
"Roger (K8RI)" wrote:

Did the program indicate the cause the last warming? If so, what
was it?

As I recall it's still a mystery. It was nothing like what they were
expecting to find. Unfortunately some one pressed the erase button on
the DVR and I can't go back and look at it. It should be on again. It
was the National Geographic HD channel. Impressive in wide screen,
high definition. IIRC they had two, one hour programs back to back.

Thanks... I'm still on analog cable as I don't watch enough TV to
"justify" switching to HD or even digital.

--
Bob Noel
(goodness, please trim replies!!!)

Recently, dVaridel posted:

"Neil Gould" wrote
Recently, dVaridel posted:
If only all non-Creationists stated it this way. Most try to prove
that they have "The Answer" (tm).

According to whom, Creationists? Scientists make no such claim.

No, thrown at me when I adopt a "Creationist" (for lack of a better
term) position in a discussion. The "Not-Creationists" (admittedly
not "Scientists" either) try to tell me that science can supply
answers to the big questions - like where did we come from etc..

A lot depends on what you (or they) meant by "...come from..." For
example, we "come from" the same material that makes up the rest of the
known universe, and that can be demonstrated scientifically. On the other
hand, what makes us "we" in the sense of our consciousness is not
currently testable, so while it may be a curiosity that interests some
scientists, I know of none that would claim to have the answer to that
"big question".

The point I was trying to make a few posts back was that I like the
Scientist as an enquiring mind approach.

That is the only approach consistent with the scientific method.

Regards,

Neil

On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:18:13 -0700, "Matt W. Barrow"
wrote in
:

Mitt Romney, practicing Mormon, who said he wishes to banish atheists from the
country.

It sounds like Willard is a bigot.

"dVaridel" wrote in
u:

"Neil Gould" wrote
Recently, dVaridel posted:
If only all non-Creationists stated it this way. Most try to prove
that they have "The Answer" (tm).

According to whom, Creationists? Scientists make no such claim.

No, thrown at me when I adopt a "Creationist" (for lack of a better
term) position in a discussion. The "Not-Creationists" (admittedly
not "Scientists" either) try to tell me that science can supply
answers to the big questions - like where did we come from etc..


KIf they're not sicentists, then what's your beef?


The point I was trying to make a few posts back was that I like the
Scientist as an enquiring mind approach.



You are like a scinetist or you like the scientific aproach?


Bertie

Slug wrote:
Thomas Borchert wrote:
Bob,

because a simplistic, borderline dumb statement like "Others - In the
beginning there was nothing, then it exploded" has no basis in science.


Throughout the entire Clinton presidency Hillary's husband waved a
succession of his girlfriends in front of her face. Did she ever cry in
public? Not that I can remember. But let someone ask her how a campaign
is affecting her and here come the tears. Don't you ladies realize how
phony she is?

During his Presidency, HA! He was virtually a monk during his
presidency. During his Governorship the crack of dawn wasn't even safe.

Jim Logajan wrote:
It appears that
Hawking has changed his view of "time" on at least one occasion.

When he has time for it.

--
Message posted via http://www.aviationkb.com

On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:48:01 -0500, Bob Noel
wrote:

In article ,
"Roger (K8RI)" wrote:

Did the program indicate the cause the last warming? If so, what
was it?

As I recall it's still a mystery. It was nothing like what they were
expecting to find. Unfortunately some one pressed the erase button on
the DVR and I can't go back and look at it. It should be on again. It
was the National Geographic HD channel. Impressive in wide screen,
high definition. IIRC they had two, one hour programs back to back.

Thanks... I'm still on analog cable as I don't watch enough TV to
"justify" switching to HD or even digital.

Check BPS listings as those programs also show up there from time to
time.

Don't forget (if you watch off the air stations in the US) that analog
is going away Feb. 17, 2009. Coupons for Digital to analog converters
are available at https://www.dtv2009.gov/ApplyCoupon.aspx although the
boxes are not likely to be available before April of this year (and
the coupons are only good for 90 days)

Roger (K8RI)

"Kloudy via AviationKB.com" u33403@uwe wrote in message
news:7e37b2db510f4@uwe...
Jim Logajan wrote:
It appears that
Hawking has changed his view of "time" on at least one occasion.

When he has time for it.


Traded his old analog watch for a digital?