If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Who de-activated ground-air missiles on 9-11?
The Pentagon is protected by a computerized system. When a plane
enters the pentagon protected space the computer automatically sends a message to the plane demanding the pilot punch in a code allowing it to enter the space. If that is not done within seconds, the plane is automatically shot down with missiles Now you might say the hijackers knew about this and demanded the pilot of Flight 77 give them the code. But surely he would have given them the wrong code and there would be no time to retrun to the pilot and beat the correct code out of him. Either the missile system was de-activated that day or someone gave the hijackers the code before-hand. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
This is bull. I haven't been on this board for long but suspected you had no
credibility. Either you are ignorant enough to believe stuff like this and regurgitate it or you made it up. Either way you are not credible. Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote in message ... The Pentagon is protected by a computerized system. When a plane enters the pentagon protected space the computer automatically sends a message to the plane demanding the pilot punch in a code allowing it to enter the space. If that is not done within seconds, the plane is automatically shot down with missiles Now you might say the hijackers knew about this and demanded the pilot of Flight 77 give them the code. But surely he would have given them the wrong code and there would be no time to retrun to the pilot and beat the correct code out of him. Either the missile system was de-activated that day or someone gave the hijackers the code before-hand. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote: Inflammatory "name" tends to discredit you before the first word of your message. The Pentagon is protected by a computerized system. Is it? When a plane enters the pentagon protected space the computer automatically sends a message to the plane demanding the pilot punch in a code allowing it to enter the space. If you say so. What is your source for this information? If that is not done within seconds, the plane is automatically shot down with missiles Right. Now you might say the hijackers knew about this and demanded the pilot of Flight 77 give them the code. Maybe they would, if it were true. But surely he would have given them the wrong code and there would be no time to retrun to the pilot and beat the correct code out of him. You've drawn an unsupportable conclusion from a weak premise. Either the missile system was de-activated that day or someone gave the hijackers the code before-hand. Either... or... or maybe your entire argument is flawed? How do you know about this automatic Pentagon missile system? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 10 May 2004 12:08:47 -0700, "lysdexic"
wrote: This is bull. I haven't been on this board for long but suspected you had no credibility. Either you are ignorant enough to believe stuff like this and regurgitate it or you made it up. Either way you are not credible. Thank you for the namecalling. Now why don't you address the issue? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
B2431 wrote:
Best to kill file the fool. I don't know about anyone else, but I killfile anything that is crossposted to 3 or more groups, so I didn't see this thread at all until you stripped out the other groups from the headers. In general I have found anything crossposted to 3 groups or more is useless drivel of one sort or another. Crossposting to 2 groups is usually on topic and relevant. Bill Ranck Blacksburg, Va. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote in message ... On Mon, 10 May 2004 12:08:47 -0700, "lysdexic" wrote: This is bull. I haven't been on this board for long but suspected you had no credibility. Either you are ignorant enough to believe stuff like this and regurgitate it or you made it up. Either way you are not credible. Thank you for the namecalling. Now why don't you address the issue? how do you expect anyone to address the issue when you cannot even address his question as to whether or not you made it up? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"james" wrote in message news:ErQnc.26228$fE.18444@fed1read02... In article , Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote: Inflammatory "name" tends to discredit you before the first word of your message. The Pentagon is protected by a computerized system. Is it? When a plane enters the pentagon protected space the computer automatically sends a message to the plane demanding the pilot punch in a code allowing it to enter the space. If you say so. What is your source for this information? If that is not done within seconds, the plane is automatically shot down with missiles Right. Now you might say the hijackers knew about this and demanded the pilot of Flight 77 give them the code. Maybe they would, if it were true. But surely he would have given them the wrong code and there would be no time to retrun to the pilot and beat the correct code out of him. You've drawn an unsupportable conclusion from a weak premise. Either the missile system was de-activated that day or someone gave the hijackers the code before-hand. Either... or... or maybe your entire argument is flawed? How do you know about this automatic Pentagon missile system? Surely all these issues have been addressed by the investigators of 9/11, and can be read from their final report. Anybody seen that report? In the net? I certainly would like to see it, the "official" official story. Yes, one would expect Pentagon to be one of the best protected targets in the whole US. But US military history does not necessarily bear this out. For some interesting reading, you might wish to peek at the following links, and look for "C3 legacy". Here is one quote: --- begin quote MIT had recommended that the SAGE computer facilities be located remotely, away from both cities and military bases, so that they would not be bonus targets in the event of an attack. When the Air Defense Command was called upon to select SAGE sites, however, they realized that their people would not enjoy being assigned to the boondocks, so they decided to put the SAGE centers at military bases instead. Following up on that choice, the Air Defense Command looked for military bases with the best facilities, especially good O-clubs. Sure enough, SAC had the best facilities around, so they put many of the SAGE sites on SAC bases. Given that SAC bases would be prime targets in any manned bomber attack, the SAGE centers thus became bonus targets that would be destroyed without extra effort. Thus the peacetime lifestyle interests of the military were put ahead of their defense responsibilities. --- end quote http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/9.60.html http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/9.65.html http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/9.67.html http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/9.74.html http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/9.80.html http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/9.97.html Matti P. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote in message ... The Pentagon is protected by a computerized system. When a plane enters the pentagon protected space the computer automatically sends a message to the plane demanding the pilot punch in a code allowing it to enter the space. If that is not done within seconds, the plane is automatically shot down with missiles Now you might say the hijackers knew about this and demanded the pilot of Flight 77 give them the code. But surely he would have given them the wrong code and there would be no time to retrun to the pilot and beat the correct code out of him. Either the missile system was de-activated that day or someone gave the hijackers the code before-hand. You mean Hani Hanjour, the Arab who couldn't even fly a Cesna solo, who is purported to have spun that Boeing down from cruising altitude, in order to skim an overpass, clip a couple of lampposts, and then slam it into the FAR side of the Pantagon - that hijacker you mean? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"z" wrote in message ... "Daniel" wrote in message ... Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote in message ... On Mon, 10 May 2004 12:08:47 -0700, "lysdexic" wrote: This is bull. I haven't been on this board for long but suspected you had no credibility. Either you are ignorant enough to believe stuff like this and regurgitate it or you made it up. Either way you are not credible. Thank you for the namecalling. Now why don't you address the issue? how do you expect anyone to address the issue when you cannot even address his question as to whether or not you made it up? Refute or go back to your schoolwork. ok, i hereby declare you refuted. have a nice day. -- Gee willikers, it must be obvious day at Camp Stupid. ($1 to Master Shake) www.spiritofamerica.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tactical Air Control Party Airmen Help Ground Forces | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 22nd 04 02:20 AM |
Wing in Ground Effect? | BllFs6 | Home Built | 10 | December 18th 03 05:11 AM |
Poland: French Missile Report Was Wrong | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 8 | October 7th 03 10:54 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Antenna Ground Plane Grounding | Fastglasair | Home Built | 1 | July 8th 03 05:21 PM |