A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Aerobatics
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

new theory of flight released Sept 2004



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2  
Old October 5th 04, 10:20 PM
Bas Jansen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mark Oliver wrote:
THIS HAS A MAJOR PROBLEM - specifically inverted flight. The current theory
of flight utilizing the Bernoulli's Principal is only applicable to normal
level flight.


Really? I think you're mistaken. It's also applicable in inverted flight
as far as I can see. Orientation of, in this case, an airframe does not
change the laws of physics. As long as the airfoil produces lift equal
to the mass of the aircraft it'll keep level. didn't you notice that
inverted flight with a positive profile requires a higher AOA to counter
the 'excess lift' pointed downwards...

possible. Thus, the Bernoulli's Principal is no longer applicable to
inverted flight, so there must be another theory that supports flight, be it
level or inverted.


Wow... slow down a bit. Where and how do you come up with a conclusion
like this? See my reply above.


The new theory of flight is based upon the new theory of Gravitational
Vector Force (released Sept 2004). Utilizing Newton's laws that equal
opposite force is generated at right angles,


I'm not a physics major but... "Newton's laws that equal opposite force
is generated at right angles.." is false. How can an opposite force be
at right angles? It is "opposite and equal". I think you need to read up
on some of your high-school physics books....

You may read more about this new theory at www.threexd.com


No thanks... I'll take a backseat on this one. Gravitational Vector
Force sounds sexy but I think it's bu****it... ummm... flawed. I'll
stick with the Bernoulli's Principal for now. :-)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.