If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"ops" wrote in message ... : : The hard drives are for Matt - an over the phone update (MTOG) : : Wonder what happens it the company after the 25th January 2004? : : rm : A firm that builds hard drives is a reputable aircraft builder ? Looking at the presentation it's very airy fairy with no details. And its not even April 1 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ProtoBike VTOL Flying Motorcycle thingy
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:36:37 -0800, "John Smith"
wrote in Message-Id: : There's a company named ProtoScience in the U.S.A. that is making "personal VTOL" vehicles that look like a flying motorcycle. Seems they are building a couple hundred of them for the military (known as VerLiVee's) and will also make them available to civilians under the name ProtoBike VTOL. I sure would like to have one. Looks like fun. Protoscience isn't really advertising them, but supposedly they can be bought by civilians for a mere 65 grand. Visit www.ProtoScience.com/protobike.html for information. I can't imagine being exposed to a 300 mph slipstream. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Larry Dighera writes:
I can't imagine being exposed to a 300 mph slipstream. I can. It's not a pretty thought. Half that speed for brief periods is enough to wear me out for the day. I'm trying to figure out the advantage of the motorcycle-style seating. There certainly appears to be plenty of aircraft ahead of the rider. 'seems like a good place for the pilot's feet. Also, since it's "fully aerobatic", it seems foolish to have a "sit-on" design. Maybe it's only rated for negative Gs to the limit of the handlebars. My favorite part is "Military versions can carry 500 lbs of ordinance". Are they planning to carry paper versions of all of the new laws allowing military aircraft to shoot civilians? (Yes, I suspect it's just a dumb spelling mistake like "can go anywhere on a moments' notice".) 'course I'd sign up in a heartbeat for a real, usable version at that price. --kyler |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Jim Bede's name on the prospectus somewhere? -- studentpilot ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ] - A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they fly - |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 01:08:30 GMT, Kyler Laird
wrote in Message-Id: : Larry Dighera writes: I can't imagine being exposed to a 300 mph slipstream. I can. It's not a pretty thought. Half that speed for brief periods is enough to wear me out for the day. I suppose, if one takes advantage of a powerful enough turbine, with so little weight, the thrust to weight ratio would be remarkably high in comparison to most other aircraft. That could enable a vectored lift design with remarkable specifications. Such a design would be neutral to unstable, and a computerized stability/control system could provide intuitive user input for pilot control. I would expect the operation time to be limited though. I'm trying to figure out the advantage of the motorcycle-style seating. There certainly appears to be plenty of aircraft ahead of the rider. 'seems like a good place for the pilot's feet. So you would agree, that the astride-a-rocket external seating design is unworkable? Perhaps a fully reclining, well faired, form fitting, deeply impressed, operator's position would work if a matching, faired, flight suit and helmet design were employed. Also, since it's "fully aerobatic", it seems foolish to have a "sit-on" design. Maybe it's only rated for negative Gs to the limit of the handlebars. Ha ha. I would expect that a suitable harness could be fabricated to retain the pilot. My favorite part is "Military versions can carry 500 lbs of ordinance". Are they planning to carry paper versions of all of the new laws allowing military aircraft to shoot civilians? (Yes, I suspect it's just a dumb spelling mistake like "can go anywhere on a moments' notice".) It looks like a fast buck artist looking a NASA development grant to me. If you go to the home page, there is no way to navigate to the personal VTOL vehicles page. Who knows...? 'course I'd sign up in a heartbeat for a real, usable version at that price. --kyler The OP says that's possible now. I'm sure ProtoScience will gladly accept your deposit, just like Bede did with the BD-5 in the mid '70s. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Larry Dighera writes:
I'm trying to figure out the advantage of the motorcycle-style seating. There certainly appears to be plenty of aircraft ahead of the rider. 'seems like a good place for the pilot's feet. So you would agree, that the astride-a-rocket external seating design is unworkable? No, just ridiculous. On a motorcycle, it makes sense to scrunch one's body into that shape to fit nicely astride the engine, and it's not a huge problem to be unable to look up (or comfortably look forward). This thing, in comparison, is huge. You could still be "astride-a- rocket" with your feet and face forward. The difference in comfort, vision, and control would be immense. I would expect that a suitable harness could be fabricated to retain the pilot. That'd be interesting. Would it lock the pilot in a humped-back position? If so, it'll be awfully uncomfortable and restrictive for landings. If not, that first time you stretch up in a 300MPH wind should be quite an experience. --kyler |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
The hard drives are for Matt - an over the phone update (MTOG) Wonder what happens it the company after the 25th January 2004? rm John Smith wrote: There's a company named ProtoScience in the U.S.A. that is making "personal VTOL" vehicles that look like a flying motorcycle. Seems they are building a couple hundred of them for the military (known as VerLiVee's) and will also make them available to civilians under the name ProtoBike VTOL. I sure would like to have one. Looks like fun. Protoscience isn't really advertising them, but supposedly they can be bought by civilians for a mere 65 grand. Visit www.ProtoScience.com/protobike.html for information. Enjoy! John (When emailing me directly, remove the underscores from my posted email address) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Kyler Laird" wrote in message ... I'm trying to figure out the advantage of the motorcycle-style seating. There certainly appears to be plenty of aircraft ahead of the rider. 'seems like a good place for the pilot's feet. Also, since it's "fully aerobatic", it seems foolish to have a "sit-on" design. Maybe it's only rated for negative Gs to the limit of the handlebars. Of course, that way you can do all those Xtreme motorbike tricks... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The Rutan crew while testing one of their UAV designs did set it up
so a pilot could ride sitting astride the thing so they wouldn't lose the prototype in a control automation failure. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"George Black" wrote in message ... "ops" wrote in message ... : : The hard drives are for Matt - an over the phone update (MTOG) : : Wonder what happens it the company after the 25th January 2004? : : rm : A firm that builds hard drives is a reputable aircraft builder ? Looking at the presentation it's very airy fairy with no details. And its not even April 1 They don't seem to be building hard drives either. Their whole web page is full of vaporware. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mountain flying instruction: McCall, Idaho, Colorado too! | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | March 26th 04 11:24 PM |
Progress on Flying Car | Steve Dufour | General Aviation | 5 | December 19th 03 03:48 PM |
ProtoBike VTOL Flying Motorcycle thingy | Lpmcatee356 | Home Built | 8 | November 21st 03 04:20 AM |
FA: WEATHER FLYING: A PRACTICAL BOOK ON FLYING | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 5th 03 12:07 AM |
the thrill of flying interview is here! | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 0 | October 21st 03 07:41 PM |