If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Procedure for calculating weight and balance
Mxsmanic,
This is why I prefer to stay near neutral trim. So you go ahead and do that in your little game. Jeeze, you elaborately construct a problem that simply doesn't exist in real life. Get over it. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Procedure for calculating weight and balance
Thomas Borchert wrote:
Ok, you got me curious. No default position in all Cessnas I have flown. Not in the Bo. Nor in the Tobago. Not in the Cirrus nor the DA-40 or the -20. Nor any other plane I can remember INCLUDING the big airliners in MSFS. The position where the control surfaces align with the stabilizer, that is, no deflection upwards or downwards. At least that's what I interpreted the expression to mean. I freely admit I'm clueless, though. NB that I'm not saying that this position is necessarily marked anywhere, nor that it is relevant to actually flying the plane. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Procedure for calculating weight and balance
TxSrv writes:
Then you definitive statement about "how far you are from each stop" was flat wrong. No, there are simply some aircraft designs to which it does not apply. There are a lot of ways to design control surfaces. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Procedure for calculating weight and balance
Thomas Borchert writes:
Ok, you got me curious. No default position in all Cessnas I have flown. Both neutral and default positions were mentioned. While there is no default position, there is most definitely a neutral position, wherein the trim tab is aligned with the control surface, so that it creates no deflecting force. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Procedure for calculating weight and balance
Anno v. Heimburg writes:
NB that I'm not saying that this position is necessarily marked anywhere, nor that it is relevant to actually flying the plane. It is slightly relevant. If you have a substantial amount of trim set for a control surface, the distance remaining to the limits of its travel are substantially modified, and you may forget about the trim and mistakenly believe that you have more remaining control authority than actually exists. Also, if you have trim set but you think it's neutral, you may be be actively compensating for changes induced by the trim. In some aircraft, you can see the position of the controls and deduce that some trim must be in effect, but in other aircraft you cannot. Both of these potential problems can be avoided by keeping a strong awareness of the trim state of the aircraft. As long as you keep in mind that you've applied x trim while flying, you should be fine. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Procedure for calculating weight and balance
BT writes:
how far from each stop when? Trim tabs deflect control surfaces towards one of the limits of their travel. The greater the trim applied, the greater the deviation, and the less the amount of travel remaining. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Procedure for calculating weight and balance
Anno v. Heimburg wrote:
Okay, now that I've made the mistake of reading this discussion, you've got me curious: How does your plane's trim work? It's obviously not a trim tab. And how can there be no neutral/default position of the elevator or the trim device? It's the common anti-servo tab across entire trailing edge of the elevator. The trim tab position indicator is marked only as to a "takeoff" setting, which is roughly in the center. There is a sweet spot for aerodynamicists where all three horiz flying surfaces are in trail, not marked on the indicator, and it is forward of "takeoff," well toward nose down. A logical way to set tail incidence is so everything is in trail at 75% cruise velocity in std atmosphere at the alt where you can have the best cruise book number (marketing, really). As long as you still comply with Part 23 re trim effects. In MSFS, the indicator has a center mark, an apparent "default". In a typical real airplane, this ain't cruise. Where MX is getting all screwed up besides not understanding the the lift/drag effects of trim (it's almost a whole chapter in Dr. S. Hoerner's classic text, Fluid Dynamic Lift), is assuming MSFS knows when all surfaces are in trail. Such a tiny flight model tweak would be bizarre for a game sim which doesn't even fully understand air density. All trim essentially does in MSFS is tweak the same variable as elevator to allow for centering springs in joysticks. I've removed the springs from some of my joysticks, because then one fiddles less if at all with trim, and it can make hand flying even the jets easier. Much less unrealistic phugoid chasing. F-- |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Procedure for calculating weight and balance
Mxsmanic wrote:
The neutral position of a trim tab is the position in which it does not intefere with the flow of air over the control surface.... A trim tab does not necessarily "interfere" with the flow of air over a control surface. You need to read Hoerner's books. F-- |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Procedure for calculating weight and balance
Mxsmanic wrote:
BT writes: how far from each stop when? Trim tabs deflect control surfaces towards one of the limits of their travel. The greater the trim applied, the greater the deviation, and the less the amount of travel remaining. False. Except possibly in MSFS. F-- |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Procedure for calculating weight and balance
The following comments are really intended for new pilots -- Mx is beyond help. Real pilots in real airplanes set trim so they do not need to maintain pressure on the yoke during norrmal cruise operations. That may not be a consideration for sim games. The aft cg position is most ofter determined so that the airplane still pitches nosedown when the wings stall. If the weight is too far forward elevator authority is a serious limit -- the pilot may not be able to get the nose up during low speed operations, like take-offs. The physics of flight (Mx had already demonstrated he does not accept Newton's approximations of motion in other threads the careful reader will smile at my use of the word 'approximations' since he or she will understand their limitations) would suggest airplanes are more efficient with cg close to center of lift since when loaded that way the airplane is not made artificially heavy because the elevator is not exerting negative (downward) lift. One could argue that 'neutral' aircraft loading would be such that the elevator would not have to add either upward or downward force. If you're close to either limit, airspeed is your friend. On Jan 7, 7:45 am, Mxsmanic wrote: BT writes: how far from each stop when?Trim tabs deflect control surfaces towards one of the limits of their travel. The greater the trim applied, the greater the deviation, and the less the amount of travel remaining. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Differences between automotive & airplane engines | Chris Wells | Home Built | 105 | February 18th 06 11:00 PM |
Pocket PC Weight and Balance Spreadsheet | Navzilla Support | Piloting | 0 | October 9th 05 11:47 PM |
Cessna 172 F Weight and Balance | [email protected] | Owning | 8 | September 22nd 05 02:38 AM |
172S Weight and Balance Question | David J | Piloting | 9 | March 23rd 04 01:08 AM |
Weight and balance.. | Bart | Rotorcraft | 9 | August 19th 03 02:57 AM |