A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bush Iran War Plans - 4 Strike Groups in the Persian Gulf



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old October 25th 06, 11:38 PM posted to sci.military.naval,us.military.navy,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
Airyx
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 35
Default Bush Iran War Plans - 4 Strike Groups in the Persian Gulf


wrote:

Finally, it occurs to me that a hot war in the Middle East would
provide ideal cover for sweeping flawed or rigged midterm election
results under the White House carpet and denying calls for
investigation of election irregularities. As I diaried last week, 'The
president fully intends to maintain control of the House and the
Senate'. A hot war with Iran, Syria and Lebanon would certainly give a
pretext to "maintaining control".


Exactly how would a hot war with Iran influence voters to vote
Republican? I would think it would enrage Democrats and increase their
voter turn-out, thus causing the GOP to LOSE control of Congress.

Bad news. Very bad news. Another expeditionary strike group will
imminently enter the Persian Gulf where it will join the Enterprise,
Eisenhower and Iwo Jima strike groups.


-I assume the ESG you are referring to is the Boxer amphibious group.
They are there to relieve the Iwo Jima group per the normal cycle. Even
so, neither group can conduct offensive strike ops. Between them they
carry six Harriers, eight Cobras, and a whole bunch of transport
helicopters. All of which would be pretty useless for air strikes in
Iran. Good for landing Marines though.

-The Eisenhower isn't in the Persian Gulf. She is at a port call in
Cyprus. It would take about 2 days for her to get into position to
launch strikes into the Northwestern corner of Iran, from the
Northeastern Med, but that would require permission to overfly Turkish
air space and would also require USAF Tanker support, also via Turkey.

-The Enterprise is in the Arabian Sea as per the normal deployment
cycle.

No other carrier is close.
-Nimitz and Reagan are in the Eastern Pacific between Hawaii and CA
conducting work-ups
-Kitty Hawk is in the Philippine Sea
-All others are in their yard/maintenance period.
This represents the standard deployment that the US has maintained in
these areas since the 1960's. All of it was scheduled about six years
ago as the carriers go through their normal maintenance, work-up, and
deployment cycles.

In order to conduct strikes in Iran, we would need at least two
carriers in the Med and two in the Arabian sea. That isn't going to
happen anytime soon.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Records Show Bush Guard Commitment Unmet WalterM140 Military Aviation 53 September 13th 04 05:49 PM
Bush Balked at Direct Order From Guard Commander WalterM140 Military Aviation 8 September 12th 04 06:36 PM
De Borchgrave: WMD, Gulf of Tonkin, and Neocons MORRIS434 Military Aviation 0 February 12th 04 08:41 PM
God Honest Naval Aviation 2 July 24th 03 04:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.