A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

C-172 as tow plane?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 20th 13, 04:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Tom K (ES)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 30
Default C-172 as tow plane?

Under discussion at the club is selling the Cub and using a C-172 as a tow plane. Does anyone have experience with this? Good, bad, ugly?

Thanks,
  #2  
Old April 20th 13, 04:49 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Tom K (ES)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 30
Default C-172 as tow plane?

Search before type... a lot of info already out there.
  #3  
Old April 20th 13, 09:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Tony[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,965
Default C-172 as tow plane?

Stock works OK at low density altitudes with light gliders. 180hp do better with a little hotter and heavier but you'll probably be wishing for more with a draggy two seater. Nice thing is anyone can fly them.
  #4  
Old April 21st 13, 12:28 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
150flivver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 171
Default C-172 as tow plane?

On Saturday, April 20, 2013 3:21:35 PM UTC-5, Tony wrote:
Stock works OK at low density altitudes with light gliders. 180hp do better with a little hotter and heavier but you'll probably be wishing for more with a draggy two seater. Nice thing is anyone can fly them.


I've towed with 180hp 172 and a 180hp A150L. I much prefer the A150L. I wouldn't even consider a 172 with less than 180hp as the 180hp one I towed with was barely adequate.
  #5  
Old April 21st 13, 01:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
WB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 236
Default C-172 as tow plane?

Owned a share of a C-175 (same airframe as 172), with 180 hp engine, droop tips, stol kit. It is a mediocre tug.

Was in a club that had a C-172, with 150 hp, climb prop. Not a good towplane.

When you hash out all the factors, it always comes down to three good choices for tugs:

Pawnee,
Pawnee,
Pawnee.
  #6  
Old April 21st 13, 01:22 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Tony[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,965
Default C-172 as tow plane?

On Saturday, April 20, 2013 7:08:12 PM UTC-5, WB wrote:
Owned a share of a C-175 (same airframe as 172), with 180 hp engine, droop tips, stol kit. It is a mediocre tug.



Was in a club that had a C-172, with 150 hp, climb prop. Not a good towplane.



When you hash out all the factors, it always comes down to three good choices for tugs:



Pawnee,

Pawnee,

Pawnee.


a "good" towplane is one defined by me as one that will a)climb sufficiently given atmospheric conditions and glider attached and b)has an available towpilot

my friends who between them own a stock 172, apis, and russia, sure enjoy their stock 172 as they tow at low DA's with light gliders and if it wasn't for that 172 they would have to drive at least an hour or possibly more to the next closest towplane. now THAT's a "good" towplane, one at the closest airport to where you live instead of the club field 1.5 hrs away.

My other friend with a Salto, 1/2 a std. Cirrus, and a 180hp 172 has checked out his boss (they work at the airport) to tow. Nice to be able to get a tow over the lunch hour and take the afternoon off thats another very "Good" towplane.

What's a bad towplane? one that won't safely climb with a given glider/weather combination OR one that isn't where you are or one that is sitting because no one is qualified to fly it. Pawnee requires a tailwheel endorsement and probably has higher insurance requriements. Cessna pilots are a dime a dozen. I can't count how many soaring days I missed in my old club because no tailwheel qualified pilots were available to fly our Super Cub, while the FBO was full of pilots and had 4 C-172's parked out front. Oh how I wished one of those had a towhook!!!
  #7  
Old April 21st 13, 04:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default C-172 as tow plane?

On Saturday, April 20, 2013 8:08:12 PM UTC-4, WB wrote:
Owned a share of a C-175 (same airframe as 172), with 180 hp engine, droop tips, stol kit. It is a mediocre tug.



Was in a club that had a C-172, with 150 hp, climb prop. Not a good towplane.



When you hash out all the factors, it always comes down to three good choices for tugs:



Pawnee,

Pawnee,

Pawnee.


Add the Cessna AgWagon to the list. It is a Pawnee on steroids and has 300+HP - if you can't get air-born behind it, it wasn't meant to fly! ;-)
  #8  
Old April 21st 13, 04:33 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bill D
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 746
Default C-172 as tow plane?

On Saturday, April 20, 2013 9:08:55 PM UTC-6, wrote:
On Saturday, April 20, 2013 8:08:12 PM UTC-4, WB wrote:

Owned a share of a C-175 (same airframe as 172), with 180 hp engine, droop tips, stol kit. It is a mediocre tug.








Was in a club that had a C-172, with 150 hp, climb prop. Not a good towplane.








When you hash out all the factors, it always comes down to three good choices for tugs:








Pawnee,




Pawnee,




Pawnee.




Add the Cessna AgWagon to the list. It is a Pawnee on steroids and has 300+HP - if you can't get air-born behind it, it wasn't meant to fly! ;-)


Add the Pawnee PA-36 "New Brave" 400HP. Tows like a rocket but can consume a significant fraction of an airport's AVGAS supply in a weekend. http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-da...ts.main?id=400
  #9  
Old April 21st 13, 07:36 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Munk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 179
Default C-172 as tow plane?

Add the Zlin Turbo Cmelak. Scariest tow I ever had with constant 8 m/s
climb rate. Went up like a rocket.

  #10  
Old April 22nd 13, 11:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
kirk.stant
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,260
Default C-172 as tow plane?

Used to tow in a C-172, 150hp, both regular and climb prop. This was in Georgia and North Carolina, hot humid days. Everything from Open Cirrus, Blanik, 1-26, 2-33, Libelle. No heavy 2-seat glass.

The regular 172 was OK for single seat. Not spectacular but not scary and you quickly learned to find a thermal and use it until the glider pilot got the hint and released.

Towing a loaded 2-33 on a hot afternoon was marginal to dangerous.

Modified with a climb prop made towing the two-seaters a little more comfortable. Still had to optimize the climb with judicious thermalling, but it wasn't scary anymore.

Now the problem was that you hit redline RPM at about 95 knots, so going crosscountry in the climb-prop equipped 172 became a bit of a chore!

But if it's all you have available, it's better than nothing.

Kirk
66
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
F-35: Second test plane powers up, but first plane stays grounded Mike[_7_] Naval Aviation 1 October 29th 07 09:40 PM
CTB - LWS : Plane for the mission? Pilot for the plane? scronje Owning 15 May 23rd 07 07:33 PM
the plane! the plane! protect it without photons. Spike Home Built 0 December 17th 05 03:28 AM
Plane down - NASCAR team plane crashes... Chuck Piloting 10 October 28th 04 12:38 AM
Kit plane boom with Sport Plane rules Dave Home Built 1 February 4th 04 02:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.