A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

2 Questions: P-38L Rear Radar/"Phantom P-38"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 18th 04, 11:58 AM
Stephen Harding
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 2 Questions: P-38L Rear Radar/"Phantom P-38"

Couple questions on P-38 lo

Came across a reference to installation of a tail radar
on the P-38L from http://p-38online.com/p38l.html.

quote
One interesting improvement was the installation of a new
tail-warning radar system. It would signal the pilot through
flashing lights and bell sounds when an aircraft was in
close proximity behind the aircraft.
/quote

First I've heard of this for any operational model fighter
aircraft of WWII.

Was this an actual feature for the L model or an "option"
or just planning that never came to fruition?

Also a question regarding the so called "Phantom P-38" of
the Italian campaign (http://p-38online.com/phantom.html).

This is the story of a P-38 captured by the Italians and
used against bomber stragglers. I've heard it before and
believe it to be true, but this page provides a lot of
detail on the subject I've never encountered before.

The story describes the efforts of a bomber pilot shot
down by the Italian and his efforts at vengeance. This is
a story fit for Hollywood!

I liked the part about Lt Fisher, the bomber pilot visiting
the wife of Rossi, the Italian P-38 driver, and using the
visit as a means of infuriating Rossi into an attack.

Lt Fisher allegedly died in a crash during the Berlin
Airlift, and Rossi was a mourner at the funeral!

Anyone know if it's actually true, or more simple fact
that has been greatly embellished?

If you're a P-38 fan, this is a rather nice site.


SMH

  #2  
Old February 18th 04, 02:02 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Stephen Harding" wrote in message
...
Couple questions on P-38 lo

Came across a reference to installation of a tail radar
on the P-38L from http://p-38online.com/p38l.html.

quote
One interesting improvement was the installation of a new
tail-warning radar system. It would signal the pilot through
flashing lights and bell sounds when an aircraft was in
close proximity behind the aircraft.
/quote

First I've heard of this for any operational model fighter
aircraft of WWII.

Was this an actual feature for the L model or an "option"
or just planning that never came to fruition?


Tail warning radars were extensively fitted in late ww2
The AN/APS-13 was made for fighters. This was a
low-power pulse radar set, operating that flashed a
red light and rang a bell when an enemy
aircraft was approaching from the rear.

They were fitted to later model P-51D's , P-38L's,
P-47D's and P-61's

Keith



  #3  
Old February 18th 04, 11:36 PM
Stephen Harding
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Keith Willshaw wrote:

Tail warning radars were extensively fitted in late ww2
The AN/APS-13 was made for fighters. This was a
low-power pulse radar set, operating that flashed a
red light and rang a bell when an enemy
aircraft was approaching from the rear.

They were fitted to later model P-51D's , P-38L's,
P-47D's and P-61's


Never heard of this for all these aircraft. Never even
heard of it for aircraft during the Korean War.

Did it actually work?


SMH

  #4  
Old February 18th 04, 11:49 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Stephen Harding" wrote in message
...
Keith Willshaw wrote:

Tail warning radars were extensively fitted in late ww2
The AN/APS-13 was made for fighters. This was a
low-power pulse radar set, operating that flashed a
red light and rang a bell when an enemy
aircraft was approaching from the rear.

They were fitted to later model P-51D's , P-38L's,
P-47D's and P-61's


Never heard of this for all these aircraft. Never even
heard of it for aircraft during the Korean War.

Did it actually work?


Apparently it did.

Keith


  #5  
Old February 19th 04, 03:08 AM
Peter Stickney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Keith Willshaw" writes:

"Stephen Harding" wrote in message
...
Keith Willshaw wrote:

Tail warning radars were extensively fitted in late ww2
The AN/APS-13 was made for fighters. This was a
low-power pulse radar set, operating that flashed a
red light and rang a bell when an enemy
aircraft was approaching from the rear.

They were fitted to later model P-51D's , P-38L's,
P-47D's and P-61's


Never heard of this for all these aircraft. Never even
heard of it for aircraft during the Korean War.

Did it actually work?


Apparently it did.


A bit too well, in fact. The radar didn't scan or sweep - it just
tansmitted and received a fan-shaped beam behind the airplane. It
rang its alarm whenever _anything_ entered that fan. The ground,
birds, you own wingman... people were going nuts reacting to the high
rate of false alarms, so most systems were deactivated or removed.

--
Pete Stickney
A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many
bad measures. -- Daniel Webster
  #6  
Old February 19th 04, 07:18 AM
John Keeney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Stephen Harding" wrote in message
...
Keith Willshaw wrote:

Tail warning radars were extensively fitted in late ww2
The AN/APS-13 was made for fighters. This was a
low-power pulse radar set, operating that flashed a
red light and rang a bell when an enemy
aircraft was approaching from the rear.

They were fitted to later model P-51D's , P-38L's,
P-47D's and P-61's


Never heard of this for all these aircraft. Never even
heard of it for aircraft during the Korean War.

Did it actually work?


I've heard of it on the P-38.
I've not gotten any first hand reports but the impression
I've gotten is that it wasn't particularly liked: seems some
inconsiderate wingman would be all the timing passing
behind the poor pilot and setting off the warning which
would tend to, ahmm, *distract* the lead pilot.
Again, this is nothing resembling a first hand report and
may well represent a humorous adaptation of the facts.


  #7  
Old February 19th 04, 08:03 AM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter Stickney" wrote in message
news
In article ,



A bit too well, in fact. The radar didn't scan or sweep - it just
tansmitted and received a fan-shaped beam behind the airplane. It
rang its alarm whenever _anything_ entered that fan. The ground,
birds, you own wingman... people were going nuts reacting to the high
rate of false alarms, so most systems were deactivated or removed.


It was rather more useful on night fighters and bombers I imagine
since they typically operated alone, although the Germans did
manufacture a passive receiver to home in on RAF tail
warning radars IRC

Keith


  #8  
Old February 19th 04, 08:37 AM
Guy Alcala
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Keith Willshaw wrote:

"Peter Stickney" wrote in message
news
In article ,



A bit too well, in fact. The radar didn't scan or sweep - it just
tansmitted and received a fan-shaped beam behind the airplane. It
rang its alarm whenever _anything_ entered that fan. The ground,
birds, you own wingman... people were going nuts reacting to the high
rate of false alarms, so most systems were deactivated or removed.


It was rather more useful on night fighters and bombers I imagine
since they typically operated alone, although the Germans did
manufacture a passive receiver to home in on RAF tail
warning radars IRC


"Flensburg." In addition to the beaconing problem, ISTR that RAF bomber
pilots disliked Monica just as much as the U.S. fighter pilots disliked
APS-13, and for the same reason, constant false alarms. Aftert all, there
you are cruising along in the bomber stream with the damned thing going off
every few minutes, if not constantly.

Guy

  #9  
Old February 19th 04, 01:21 PM
The Enlightenment
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message
...

"Peter Stickney" wrote in message
news
In article ,



A bit too well, in fact. The radar didn't scan or sweep - it just
tansmitted and received a fan-shaped beam behind the airplane. It
rang its alarm whenever _anything_ entered that fan. The ground,
birds, you own wingman... people were going nuts reacting to the

high
rate of false alarms, so most systems were deactivated or removed.


It was rather more useful on night fighters and bombers I imagine
since they typically operated alone, although the Germans did
manufacture a passive receiver to home in on RAF tail
warning radars IRC



Tail warning radars substantialy reduced the looses of German night
fighter crews though only the elite crews were given it.

The German Radars with an "R" designation had tail warning radar
extensions of the main radar. Thus the FuG 218 SN-2R had one as well
as slightly broader frequencies to improve jame resistance marginally
and also the Naxos ZR or FuG 217 which was liked by the crewas
becuase it was quite resistent to jaming and windows.

Often the best warning of an Mosquito was a clicking in the FuG 16
radio, presumably due to the radar pulses of the powefull magnetron.






Keith




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 September 2nd 04 05:15 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 April 5th 04 03:04 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 October 2nd 03 03:07 AM
Long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids (was: #1 Jet of World War II) The Revolution Will Not Be Televised Military Aviation 20 August 27th 03 09:14 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 4 August 7th 03 05:12 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.