If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Antares 20E vs. ASH 26E VS DG 808C
"Andy" wrote in message oups.com... Price of $15 000 for the batterie is not so expansive. It's one of the costs of ownership that has to be compared with the cost of maintaining/replacing an internal combustion engine. A previous poster was concerned about the cost of replacing the ASH26E engine and the Antares battery cost seems to be comparable. Andy I don't think it's fair to compare those items directly. You *know* you will have to replace the Antares batteries after X number of discharge/charge cycles or years. This is not the case with the ASH26E, as it is most unlikely the engine would ever need to be replaced during the average lifetime of use - - there has been but one engine failure requiring complete replacement in the US . . .. and it seems there were extenuating circumstances even in that case. Of course there are other costs, related to operating an internal combustion engine, that may more appropriately be compared to the cost of those battery packs. Stuff like fuel, oil, and the additional engine maintenance of an IC engine as compared to an electric motor. The IC engine maintenance seems to be the big variable, with things like the odd water pump leak and spark plugs to replace. There's also the engine start sealed lead acid battery to replace every 3 to 5 years (though in my 26E, that amounts to only $60 - - $30 each for two 18 amp hour bats - - one is for avionics). I see the main advantage of electric launch as convenience, simplicity, and reliability (?). The "convenience" is limited, though, to flip-a-switch operation and probably much less engine maintenance. On balance, the electric will not be so convenient to use for safari type trips or even extended day trips that require longer engine runs (i.e. using the glider as Kempton has for flying from near the California coast, over the Sierra, and on to the Great Basin in NV. This requires a substantial initial climb, then glide over a wide sink-hole, and then another long climb to clear the Sierra - - okay, now where do I plug this sucker in?!). Each method of propulsion, like the glider designs themselves, has it's merits and drawbacks, so it looks like variety should be around for awhile. bumper |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|