![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Such live tracking systems based on collision avoidance techology already exist for quite a while (Flightradar24, OGN). Since 2017 FLARM based OGN has been used more or less as the standard tracking tool on competitions in Europe. It has to be made sure that collision avoidance is not reduced due to this 2nd nature of FLARM.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ADSB is not mandated in Europe. The CAA wanted to mandate SSR in UK but
this was sent down pending the development of low cost / low power ADSB. This is now available from Uavionics at about £400. At that price I expect a wide take up in the UK. Why wouldn't you want to know about spam cans, CAT, drones, and helicopters as well as gliders and why would you want to hide from ATC?? So in practice the rule makers for gliding competition cannot ban conspicuity / situational awareness tools from the cockpit as this would compromise safety. The genie is well and truly out of the bottle. As it was with GPS etc. It is possible to slow him down though. You write the rule that no data (nor voice) is allowed from ground to cockpit and no data other than required for SA / safety between pilots. Yes, this is virtually impossible to police but if the penalty was a 5 year ban from competition, it may still work. Jim |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Q: IGC to replace FLARM ? ?
A: No Following a proposal last year from Germany, IGC and OGN have embarked on a multi-year project to preserve and enhance traffic awareness technology while making tactical tracking as difficult as possible. This will be tricky! Secondary benefits may include reduced costs and live scoring. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, November 14, 2018 at 8:55:19 AM UTC-5, RS wrote:
Q: IGC to replace FLARM ? ? A: No Following a proposal last year from Germany, IGC and OGN have embarked on a multi-year project to preserve and enhance traffic awareness technology while making tactical tracking as difficult as possible. This will be tricky! Secondary benefits may include reduced costs and live scoring. Those are mutually exclusive goals. What I've been told is that FLARM use would be optional in IGC contests, while the separate, delayed, tracking devices would be required. Thus pilots who so desire could hide their location. Forcing the pilots to choose between safety and stealth is a bad idea, IMO. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, November 14, 2018 at 7:57:47 AM UTC-8, wrote:
On Wednesday, November 14, 2018 at 8:55:19 AM UTC-5, RS wrote: Q: IGC to replace FLARM ? ? A: No Following a proposal last year from Germany, IGC and OGN have embarked on a multi-year project to preserve and enhance traffic awareness technology while making tactical tracking as difficult as possible. This will be tricky! Secondary benefits may include reduced costs and live scoring. Those are mutually exclusive goals. What I've been told is that FLARM use would be optional in IGC contests, while the separate, delayed, tracking devices would be required. Thus pilots who so desire could hide their location. Forcing the pilots to choose between safety and stealth is a bad idea, IMO. I hear you can choose to turn off Flarm, but you also have to switch to a pellet variometer and a paper map. King Canute 9B |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LOL Andy, Maybe instead of low performance contests we should have "no electronics" contests instead! We might just get a few 1-26ers involved
![]() CH |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, November 21, 2018 at 7:09:55 AM UTC-8, wrote:
LOL Andy, Maybe instead of low performance contests we should have "no electronics" contests instead! We might just get a few 1-26ers involved ![]() CH Or maybe we have it all wrong. Maybe there should be no glider classes, and only classes for the different avionics toys allowed :-) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe we still have a pellet vario on the dash, I did a lot of contests and badges using a paper map and looking outside.......and cartridge film/instamatic cameras until I learned to develop my own film. I lost a badge flight due to that........way before dataloggers.
My advantage was a prototype electronic vario (with audio) from Raouf his own self after I crewed for him and his ASW-15 decades ago. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
trying to work out how you connect the flarm view 57 to mini box flarm running a V7 and Oudie | Michael Marshall[_2_] | Soaring | 3 | April 10th 16 04:13 AM |
trying to work out how you connect the flarm view 57 to mini box flarm running a V7 and Oudie | Michael Marshall[_2_] | Soaring | 0 | April 8th 16 08:57 PM |
Information for all users of Flarm, OEM FLARM supplier and Flarm PowerFlarm | [email protected] | Soaring | 28 | March 12th 16 04:31 AM |
Flarm IGC files on non-IGC certified Flarm? | Movses | Soaring | 21 | March 16th 15 09:59 PM |
IFR GPS replace DME / ADF? | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | May 15th 06 03:13 PM |